PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Judy Battista spreads the NFL's lies, then lies some more to try to cover it up


Status
Not open for further replies.
Most people are simply not aware that Judge Berman will NOT be looking at the football "facts" of this case. It's not his territory to do that.

That will be left for a different judge in a different case (possibly).

Judge Berman will only be ruling on the protocols of the appeal ruling that was handed down by Goodell.

Where Team Brady should be hammering is 3 obvious conflicts of interest that came to light during the appeal:

1) Wells gave his report to NFL official Jeff Pash pre-publication for what he termed "wordsmithing".

2) Wells' colleague at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (and one of the three lawyers credited in the Wells report) cross-examined Brady on behalf of the NFL during the appeal session.

3) Wells refused to hand over certain documents regarding whether Goodell had any influence over Troy Vincent in deciding the original puishment to Brady's team citing "client privilege".​

Those three issues should effectively prove to Judge Berman that Judge Goodell was NOT an independent arbiter at all.

(This does not even touch upon the ridiculousness of the Commissioner being the sole arbitrator in an appeal regarding his own office's initial ruling on Brady/Patriots).
 
As the appeal hearing transcript showed, Kessler asked for the transcript to be released to the public and the NFL denied his request: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/05/kessler-asked-for-transcript-release-during-hearing/

Yet back on July 28th, Judy Battista reported this: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...ruling-casts-shadow-on-tom-bradys-credibility

Pretty bad, but even worse than getting used by the league to spread more false information to make Brady and the Patriots look bad is that she is now on twitter lying about it and trying to cover up her shoddy reporting.

When someone on twitter called her out for it, she replied with this: https://twitter.com/judybattista/status/628732070077050881
("Did not report anything tonight on any topic. And what I reported was not about the appeal hearing.")

No retraction or apology to Brady, just more lies and an attempt to cover up her report. Bad enough she got the report wrong to begin with but the total lack of integrity to keep lying and try and cover her ass is what's more disgusting. Feel free to stay on her on twitter until she sets the record straight instead of trying to bury this.
Send it to Florio
Send it to Curran
Send it to Mort.......LMFAO
 
Most people are simply not aware that Judge Berman will NOT be looking at the football "facts" of this case. It's not his territory to do that.

That will be left for a different judge in a different case (possibly).

Judge Berman will only be ruling on the protocols of the appeal ruling that was handed down by Goodell.

Where Team Brady should be hammering is 3 obvious conflicts of interest that came to light during the appeal:

1) Wells gave his report to NFL official Jeff Pash pre-publication for what he termed "wordsmithing".

2) Wells' colleague at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (and one of the three lawyers credited in the Wells report) cross-examined Brady on behalf of the NFL during the appeal session.

3) Wells refused to hand over certain documents regarding whether Goodell had any influence over Troy Vincent in deciding the original puishment to Brady's team citing "client privilege".

Those three issues should effectively prove to Judge Berman that Judge Goodell was NOT an independent arbiter at all.

(This does not even touch upon the ridiculousness of the Commissioner being the sole arbitrator in an appeal regarding his own office's initial ruling on Brady/Patriots).

Or how Troy Vincent is the one that issued the punishment when per the CBA he legally couldn't and then he admitted that Brady was disciplined under a policy that was not given to players.
 
The worst kept secret truly is that, in 2015, a "professional sportswriter" is no more credible than any of us on this forum.

I used to think differently, but time and circumstances have proved me wrong.

And if you ask them candidly about it they'll say, "Well with the internet and Twitter and all the technology today we have to move so fast to break news that we occasionally make mistakes!" As if it's a reasonable justification to report false information (and not correct it) because little Jimmy at Peabody High School can text so fast you don't want him to beat you to the scoop.
 
Or how Troy Vincent is the one that issued the punishment when per the CBA he legally couldn't and then he admitted that Brady was disciplined under a policy that was not given to players.


You're exactly right. I forgot about that.

There should be FOUR solid points for Brady's team to be able to base this particular protocol case upon.

That fourth is that there never existed any penalty in their bylaws for a player being responsible for a football equipment violation.
 
You're exactly right. I forgot about that.

There should be FOUR solid points for Brady's team to be able to base this particular protocol case upon.

That fourth is that there never existed any penalty in their bylaws for a player being responsible for a football equipment violation.

There is also the fact that goodell point blanked lied in his appeal decision when he said that Brady only talked to Jastremski about prepping the balls for the SB.
 
......and Mark Cuban sits on the sidelines chuckling to himself and waiting......
**** that douche. He's said Brady is guilty too!
 
There is also the fact that goodell point blanked lied in his appeal decision when he said that Brady only talked to Jastremski about prepping the balls for the SB.


Not relevant to THIS Judge's territory though.

As I mentioned, he does not have jurisdiction over the FACTS of the case and judgement opinion.

Just about protocol/independence, etc of the NFL's report and appeal process "arbitrator".
 
CLwHRKFUEAAti4k.png:large
 
Most people are simply not aware that Judge Berman will NOT be looking at the football "facts" of this case. It's not his territory to do that.

That will be left for a different judge in a different case (possibly).

Judge Berman will only be ruling on the protocols of the appeal ruling that was handed down by Goodell.

Where Team Brady should be hammering is 3 obvious conflicts of interest that came to light during the appeal:

1) Wells gave his report to NFL official Jeff Pash pre-publication for what he termed "wordsmithing".

2) Wells' colleague at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (and one of the three lawyers credited in the Wells report) cross-examined Brady on behalf of the NFL during the appeal session.

3) Wells refused to hand over certain documents regarding whether Goodell had any influence over Troy Vincent in deciding the original puishment to Brady's team citing "client privilege".

Those three issues should effectively prove to Judge Berman that Judge Goodell was NOT an independent arbiter at all.

(This does not even touch upon the ridiculousness of the Commissioner being the sole arbitrator in an appeal regarding his own office's initial ruling on Brady/Patriots).

I do not think this is entirely correct.
There are other issues that Berman can rule on, and technically it can include everything that occured during the appeal hearing.
(among other things because I don't have the time to go back and look)

The NFLPA is claiming that there was no basis for the punishment.
Brady was punished under a rule that applies to teams not players.
The rule does not call for suspension.
No policy calls for suspension for this accusation.
There is no policy that calls for punishment for 'general awareness' of a misdeed by someone else.
These are all under the Notice heading and are very solid legal ground, IMO.

There is also the fairness issue which includes whether the investigation was conducted fairly, whether the crime fits the punishment and whether the punishment has precedent.

All of these are open game, and when you really look at it guilt or innocence is absolutely at the heart of this even though the ruling isn't based on guilt or innocence itself.
 
Slowly? Looks like we are already there.

Worse than the WWE.
At least with the WWE, McMahon admits it is just "entertainment" and they admit it is scripted. Goodell and company wants you to believe they are on the up and up. McMahon screwing Bret Hart out of the title has nothing on what Goodell, Kensil, Vincent and Pash are trying to do.
 
Last edited:
well, I tweeted her but I don't expect to hear back
 


Man, the league office just does not give a sh!t. They will leak any blatant lie that helps them. Yet NFL reporters just let the NFL use them as useful idiots over and over.

Crazy, just crazy. This stuff is not even spin, it is just straight up lies.
 
Man, the league office just does not give a sh!t. They will leak any blatant lie that helps them. Yet NFL reporters just let the NFL use them as useful idiots over and over.

Crazy, just crazy. This stuff is not even spin, it is just straight up lies.

Thing with her though is the nfl signs her checks. So she had no choice. Not that I feel sorry for her because she got hung out to dry but really she knows either you run it or the nfl assigns you to the Jaguars beat or something then fires you and brings in someone like MCI (volin) for cheaper who is more than happy to deliver the nfl's spin.
 
Last edited:
Or how Troy Vincent is the one that issued the punishment when per the CBA he legally couldn't and then he admitted that Brady was disciplined under a policy that was not given to players.

I'm sure Brady was at least "Generally Aware" of the policy....what proof do I have?.....We need not bring proof into these proceedings.
 
Thing with her though is the nfl signs her checks. So she had no choice. Not that I feel sorry for her because she got hung out to dry but really she knows either you run it or the nfl assigns you to the Jaguars beat or something then fires you and brings in someone like MCI (volin) for cheaper who is more than happy to deliver the nfl's spin.

well, dishonesty's much better if you take money for it
 
Not relevant to THIS Judge's territory though.

As I mentioned, he does not have jurisdiction over the FACTS of the case and judgement opinion.

Just about protocol/independence, etc of the NFL's report and appeal process "arbitrator".
I would think that Goodell's flat out lying in his appeal decision would strike to the heart of the question about whether he was an honest and impartial arbitrator.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top