- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
- Went out to dinner with family
- Enjoyed listening to my mother mocking those who bought Kraft's story
- Came home
- Read this:
...Prior to the hearing, Goodell had
ruled that Brady and the Union could not question essential witnesses, denied them
access to the investigative files underlying the Wells Report (which were nonetheless
available to the NFL's counsel at the arbitration), and summarily rejected Bradyos
unlawful delegation argument without considering any evidence (other than 'ofacts"
decreed by Goodell himself in his decision). At the hearing itself, Paul, Weiss-the
purportedly o'independent" law firm whose findings about Brady were being
CASE 0:15-cv-03168-RHK-HB Document 1 Filed 07/29/15 Page 7 of 54
challenged-abandoned all pretense of objectivity, and actively participated as counsel
for the NFL conducting direct and cross-examinations of witnesses (including Brady's).
A Paul. Weiss partner represented the NFL for most of the hearing, even though he was a
signatory to the Wells Report and his law partner (Wells) was a fact witness at the same
hearing.
I've been laughing ever since.