- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 19,716
- Reaction score
- 31,158
I read all of the Sunday columns and I usually enjoy his as well because there tends to be a few little bits of information that are interesting.
I've gone back and forth with him a few times over email and he's been a great guy. But I was kind of surprised to see this bit this morning:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/...quarterback/ihhIAb6oJJdUrFS8V8w7uJ/story.html
I think the opinions have more to do with the fact the home fans don't believe Brady did enough (or anything) to deserve the suspension, and that the science isn't definitive enough to prove one way or the other that there was any wrongdoing. So I don't think today's attempt to give fans "a reality check" is going to accomplish anything.
I've gone back and forth with him a few times over email and he's been a great guy. But I was kind of surprised to see this bit this morning:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/...quarterback/ihhIAb6oJJdUrFS8V8w7uJ/story.html
The point here is not to dump on the AEI scientists. It’s to point out that Patriots fans need a reality check when it comes to Deflategate.
The Wells Report was attacked viciously and thoroughly in New England, home to some of the most brilliant scientific and legal minds in the world, as well as the most rabid and passionate fans in the country.
It’s millions of Patriots fans vs. one Ted Wells, and Wells has gotten clobbered.
But when anything pro-Patriots is released — such as the AEI report or the Patriots’ Context Report — every word is taken as gospel. There’s been very little critical analysis of their work, and anything that doesn’t fit the “Patriots are innocent” story line is ignored.
Last week, DeSarno forwarded me an e-mail he had sent AEI wondering why it didn’t use his analysis model, and I published the e-mail on Twitter. The response in New England? Crickets from radio hosts, bloggers, other reporters, and the Patriots. Same from AEI, which never responded to DeSarno.
No one seemed to care that a reputable statistician was able to debunk the AEI report and lend a little credence to the Wells Report.
I think the opinions have more to do with the fact the home fans don't believe Brady did enough (or anything) to deserve the suspension, and that the science isn't definitive enough to prove one way or the other that there was any wrongdoing. So I don't think today's attempt to give fans "a reality check" is going to accomplish anything.