PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Official Brady Appeal Thread: D-Day Tuesday June 23rd


Status
Not open for further replies.
and of course

felger wannabe bertrand: Brady having explanations for everything doesn't look good.
 
and of course

felger wannabe bertrand: Brady having explanations for everything doesn't look good.

While I am not listening to Zo and that fat watermelon with legs and glasses, he does have a point. The fact that TB12 needed to spend 10hrs in a room to explain that he had nothing to do with something that didn't happen is a tough spot to be in. Especially when you know your accusers are powerful and have a major agenda against you and the team you play for.
 
While I am not listening to Zo and that fat watermelon with legs and glasses, he does have a point. The fact that TB12 needed to spend 10hrs in a room to explain that he had nothing to do with something that didn't happen is a tough spot to be in. Especially when you know your accusers are powerful and have a major agenda against you and the team you play for.

He was implying that Brady was lying.
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-reactions-to-erroneous-espn-reports/related/

Interesting take on the NFL's insistence to correct an improper communication on the NFL.
The NFL leapt to correct a potentially faulty report on the appeal schedule.
They enabled a completely faulty report on the test results of the Patriots footballs to be repeated, and actively prohibited the Patriots from correcting the false report.

That's fact. We can take whatever conclusion we wish.
 
He was implying that Brady was lying.

OK so he is still in that camp with the rest of the ignorant, moronic, over-the-top contrarians.
 
While I am not listening to Zo and that fat watermelon with legs and glasses, he does have a point. The fact that TB12 needed to spend 10hrs in a room to explain that he had nothing to do with something that didn't happen is a tough spot to be in. Especially when you know your accusers are powerful and have a major agenda against you and the team you play for.

When someone is stupid enough to say something like "He had an explanation for everything. That's a bad sign", that someone is either a complete fool or is trying to stir up ****. When it comes to a hearing, you're supposed to have an explanation for everything, if at all possible. It's the lack of an explanation that leads to problems:

"Where were you at 10:00 pm, when your wife was being murdered?"

Good answer - "I was conducting an interview on local television. The station has all the film you need to verify the time".

Bad answer - "I don't know/remember. I have no explanation".
 
F/uck Bertrand fat ass, I'm turning to MFB on WEEI
 
While I am not listening to Zo and that fat watermelon with legs and glasses, he does have a point. The fact that TB12 needed to spend 10hrs in a room to explain that he had nothing to do with something that didn't happen is a tough spot to be in. Especially when you know your accusers are powerful and have a major agenda against you and the team you play for.

i have to disagree. brady probably only spoke for 1-2 hours max. the rest of it was kessler tearing holes in the wells report and wells presenting his own arguments.
 
F/uck Bertrand fat ass, I'm turning to MFB on WEEI

This was my concern when I found out Bertrand was moving into that slot with Zo and they booted Gresh.... I was worried that he was going to bring everything he learned from Vomit & Spaz and change the entire dynamic of the show to be contrarian and annoying...

It looks like its already headed in that direction and will force me to completely tune out 98.5 all together, even though I like Zo a lot..

Thats Zo's show, he needs to just hammer that fat ass and put him in his place when he tries to pull his contrarian BS with no logic or reason behind it
 
He'll be as bad as Bertrand, and there won't be a Zolak to counter, since Fauria doesn't do as good a job.

The problem is, Zolak doesn't do enough to put Bertrand in his place ....
 
The problem is, Zolak doesn't do enough to put Bertrand in his place ....

That's what happens when the putz is the one controlling the dials. The same thing happens on WEEI, where Benz controls the show.
 
“Sources” who surely work for Tom Brady say Tom Brady was a great witness

Mike Florio

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-tom-brady-say-tom-brady-was-a-great-witness/

Citing unnamed “sources” (i.e., more than one), Schefter also said that Brady “came off as very genuine, earnest and persuasive, addressing every issue raised in the league-sanctioned Wells report.”

One source called it “an A-plus performance.”

With all due respect and deference to Schefter’s preference that members of the media not speculate on the identity of unnamed sources, it’s pretty clear that he’s getting his information from people in Brady’s camp. And it’s not really information; it’s a self-serving characterization from someone with an obvious bias in favor of Brady.
 
When someone is stupid enough to say something like "He had an explanation for everything. That's a bad sign", that someone is either a complete fool or is trying to stir up ****. When it comes to a hearing, you're supposed to have an explanation for everything, if at all possible. It's the lack of an explanation that leads to problems:

"Where were you at 10:00 pm, when your wife was being murdered?"

Good answer - "I was conducting an interview on local television. The station has all the film you need to verify the time".

Bad answer - "I don't know/remember. I have no explanation".
Yep and at least based on the snippets I have heard/read, TB answered every question with the conviction and honesty that the NFL side of the room lacks.
 
i have to disagree. brady probably only spoke for 1-2 hours max. the rest of it was kessler tearing holes in the wells report and wells presenting his own arguments.
I hope so. I haven't seen any info on how much Q&A Brady, Vincent, Wells or anyone else had.
 
“Sources” who surely work for Tom Brady say Tom Brady was a great witness

Mike Florio

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-tom-brady-say-tom-brady-was-a-great-witness/

It's all about the clicks baby. Florio's loyalty lies in the almighty dollar, but at least he's consistent with not favoring one team over another. Even when the Roethlisberger sexual assault thing was going on, he was reporting it and bashing E!SPN for not saying a word. He also put the pieces together of ESPN not saying anything because Ben was going to be on an ABC show a week after that whole mess started.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Back
Top