PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Discussing "The pick". What if..


Status
Not open for further replies.

varjao

Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
6,544
Reaction score
6,227
PATSPATSPATS.0.gif


What if Butler take a knee in the endzone?

That would presumably result in a touchback and the ball in the 20 yard line. Game over.

BUT, he actually caught the ball outside of the endzone and got carried back to the EZ by the impact on the Seattle receiver, if the referees call the play like he caught outside of the endzone and then came back, it would be a safety and Seattle's ball. Under the current circumstances I believe it's 95% of chances they would make this wrong call.

Very critical and difficult call.

I think Butler didn't think about any of that and just played with instincts, anyway, THANK GOD he jumped to the 2 yard line.
 
PATSPATSPATS.0.gif


What if Butler take a knee in the endzone?

That would presumably result in a touchback and the ball in the 20 yard line. Game over.

BUT, he actually caught the ball outside of the endzone and got carried back to the EZ by the impact on the Seattle receiver, if the referees call the play like he caught outside of the endzone and then came back, it would be a safety and Seattle's ball. Under the current circumstances I believe it's 95% of chances they would make this wrong call.

Very critical and difficult call.

I think Butler didn't think about any of that and just played with instincts, anyway, THANK GOD he jumped to the 2 yard line.

LOL. Look at Kearse blatently try to reach out and grab a hold of Butler then turn around and complain to the refs about PI after the INT.
 
PATSPATSPATS.0.gif


What if Butler take a knee in the endzone?

That would presumably result in a touchback and the ball in the 20 yard line. Game over.

BUT, he actually caught the ball outside of the endzone and got carried back to the EZ by the impact on the Seattle receiver, if the referees call the play like he caught outside of the endzone and then came back, it would be a safety and Seattle's ball. Under the current circumstances I believe it's 95% of chances they would make this wrong call.

Very critical and difficult call.

I think Butler didn't think about any of that and just played with instincts, anyway, THANK GOD he jumped to the 2 yard line.
I think he was carried into the EZ by an impetus from the opposing team simultaneous with the pick, THEREFORE.....

IMO IF he had taken a knee in the EZ, the correct call would have been touchback, out to the 20.

HOWEVER, the likelihood of NFL referees making a correct possibly game-deciding call that just happens to be in favor of a team name beginning with p and ending with s is about 3%. So just as well he ran two yds.

But I don't think he was thinking thru all that, he was just going on instinct of try to bring it back whenever you get a pick.
 
I think they can review that if they had called a safety.
 
He did the right thing. Can't take a chance on the refs making the right call vs calling it a safety.
Absolutely. God knows it's been covered a million times but a 28-26 game makes things a little more interesting.
 
He said in interviews that he was thinking of this and it is why he ran it out.
 
HOWEVER, the likelihood of NFL referees making a correct possibly game-deciding call that just happens to be in favor of a team name beginning with p and ending with s is about 3%. So just as well he ran two yds.
I don't understand, the refs made a horrible wrong call in favor of the Panthers just last year.
 
The situation you describe is actually not considered a touchback. I see one of 2 possible rulings, each giving the Patriots the ball at the 1 yard line, which (1) being IMHO the more likely call:

(1) Even though he caught it on the 1 yard line, the impetus of the ball and player momentum is what moved the ball into the end zone. (Yes Butler runs forward to make the INT, but his momentum shifts directions at the point of contact with the WR). Assuming he subsequently got tackled in the end zone (or took a knee), then when such a thing happens on an interception, the correct call is the defending team is awarded possession of the ball at the spot of the interception.

(2) It could maybe be ruled that he caught the ball and became a runner right away, then got bounced backwards into the end zone. In such a case, like any other runner, he should be awarded forward progress to the spot of the 1 yard line.

The way I see it, the proper call would have been to give the Patriots the ball at around the 1 yard line no matter how you look at it.

EDIT: I am also assuming the referee rules he made the interception at the 1 yard line. However, it looks to me like he never actually gained possession of the ball with both feet down and makes a football move until after he is back in the end zone. So yes, in that case, I think it would be a touchback.
 
Last edited:
The situation you describe is actually not considered a touchback. I see one of 2 possible rulings, each giving the Patriots the ball at the 1 yard line, which (1) being IMHO the more likely call:

(1) Even though he caught it on the 1 yard line, the impetus of the ball and player momentum is what moved the ball into the end zone. (Yes Butler runs forward to make the INT, but his momentum shifts directions at the point of contact with the WR). Assuming he subsequently got tackled in the end zone (or took a knee), then when such a thing happens on an interception, the correct call is the defending team is awarded possession of the ball at the spot of the interception.

(2) It could maybe be ruled that he caught the ball and became a runner right away, then got bounced backwards into the end zone. In such a case, like any other runner, he should be awarded forward progress to the spot of the 1 yard line.

The way I see it, the proper call would have been to give the Patriots the ball at around the 1 yard line no matter how you look at it.

EDIT: I am also assuming the referee rules he made the interception at the 1 yard line. However, it looks to me like he never actually gained possession of the ball with both feet down and makes a football move until after he is back in the end zone. So yes, in that case, I think it would be a touchback.

I don't think anyone on this forum would be comfortable pinning the chance of a championship on the chance that the refs would make the "proper call". See: Tyree play.
 
It looks like Hightower also gave Malcolm a shove on the hip to make sure that he went down and didn't try to dance around and fumble.
 
The situation you describe is actually not considered a touchback. I see one of 2 possible rulings, each giving the Patriots the ball at the 1 yard line, which (1) being IMHO the more likely call:

(1) Even though he caught it on the 1 yard line, the impetus of the ball and player momentum is what moved the ball into the end zone. (Yes Butler runs forward to make the INT, but his momentum shifts directions at the point of contact with the WR). Assuming he subsequently got tackled in the end zone (or took a knee), then when such a thing happens on an interception, the correct call is the defending team is awarded possession of the ball at the spot of the interception.

(2) It could maybe be ruled that he caught the ball and became a runner right away, then got bounced backwards into the end zone. In such a case, like any other runner, he should be awarded forward progress to the spot of the 1 yard line.

The way I see it, the proper call would have been to give the Patriots the ball at around the 1 yard line no matter how you look at it.

EDIT: I am also assuming the referee rules he made the interception at the 1 yard line. However, it looks to me like he never actually gained possession of the ball with both feet down and makes a football move until after he is back in the end zone. So yes, in that case, I think it would be a touchback.

This is how I see it as well. Thanks for saving me the typing. :)

It looks like Hightower also gave Malcolm a shove on the hip to make sure that he went down and didn't try to dance around and fumble.

And damn near stripped the ball! Gives my heart a jolt even now. :confused:
 
I think it more probable than not that Butler was generally aware of the dangers of taking a knee at that place and time.
 
PATSPATSPATS.0.gif


What if Butler take a knee in the endzone?

That would presumably result in a touchback and the ball in the 20 yard line. Game over.

BUT, he actually caught the ball outside of the endzone and got carried back to the EZ by the impact on the Seattle receiver, if the referees call the play like he caught outside of the endzone and then came back, it would be a safety and Seattle's ball. Under the current circumstances I believe it's 95% of chances they would make this wrong call.

Very critical and difficult call.

I think Butler didn't think about any of that and just played with instincts, anyway, THANK GOD he jumped to the 2 yard line.

Yea thats a scary thought, although they could argue that he didnt have full possession of the football until he was knocked back into the endzone.

Thank goodness it didnt turn out that way!
 
What impresses me the most about Malcom is how he appears to always be thinking.

Hell, Belichick praised him as much for pushing Kearse out of bounds after the "that's crazy, yo" catch as he did for the interception.
 
Man, if Malcolm doesn't squeeze that ball, this would be the worst 6 months in recent Boston sports history. Excruciating SB loss (again), ridiculous investigation and penalty for air not missing from balls, Bruins collapse, Red Sox fall out of the race by the All-Star break, Sandoval is flogging his dolphin to IG photos during games, Celtics are now stuck in NBA purgatory. Wow.
 
Man, if Malcolm doesn't squeeze that ball, this would be the worst 6 months in recent Boston sports history. Excruciating SB loss (again), ridiculous investigation and penalty for air not missing from balls, Bruins collapse, Red Sox fall out of the race by the All-Star break, Sandoval is flogging his dolphin to IG photos during games, Celtics are now stuck in NBA purgatory. Wow.

Who says we don't stop them on 3rd or 4th down? Gotta have faith man! ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Back
Top