Your list is irrelevant and your post is a waste of time, so I'm not going to bother reading it any further than this, because you've already gone off the rails. I didn't say that none of these players would pan out. I have, in fact, said that they are banking on one or more of them doing just that. I've talked about what they've been to this point, and I've talked about how the homers on the board react to players, year after year after year. All the Thompkinses, Burresses, Hayeses, O'Neals and Sudfelds of the world don't stop you people from ignoring logic, despite it being obvious that what BB is doing is throwing numbers at a problem and hoping to get lucky with a player or two, and not stocking the cupboard with hundreds of can't miss players.
Other than last year and when Talib was healthy, this team hasn't had serviceable defensive backfields since 2007, yet BB finds a way to make it work. It's a tribute to his coaching that he's been able to keep this team going despite his ongoing failure to find a long term solution to his problems in that defensive secondary. That being the case doesn't change the underlying issue of having bad players back there, though.
You can argue all the straw men you want, though, if that makes you feel better.