Context of "Deflate and give somebody that jkt." synchronized to Packers game

Yea and the cameraman can be refered to the "shooter" dorito dink > cause he rubs footballs.
Can you imagine that Brady gave "relevent" texts and emails to Wells, and than this thing goes to Court where they have to give phone and they find 1 text that was relevent that he didnt give! He will give the phone when in Court and not before.

And this starts because the NFL leaks like a sieve.

Sfpat said:

Why? What evidence do you have that it means anything else?

Click to expand...

There's the million dollar question. When presenting circumstantial evidence, you can't just outright dismiss one person's explanation without first providing evidence to disprove it.

It would not surprise me if dorito dink has a reference to a crass sex story where someone got Doritos cheese on their fingers then on their junk. Or it may be unrelated.

However, if that is the origin I want someone to testify in federal court about the happenings of dorito's and dink's leading to the nickname.

Nothing could underscore the absurdity of this thing more than a tense Perry Mason scene about johnson's covered in artificial cheese, and the sexual bloopers that resulted.

Everyone back up.......

1. If balls are scientifically proven not to be below 12.5 psi at the start of the AFC championship game through ideal gas law then there is no crime. To investigate a murder you need a dead body. This would make everything else including text messages, cell phones, interviews, failure to fully cooperate, etc all moot points. We have the science.

2. Everyone automatically concludes ball deflation occurs after ref check. Aren't the balls prepped by McNally and J then handed to the refs? During the prepping process, M and J probably deflate to 12.5 thus the nickname "deflator". In this context completely legal. No where in the text messages can one conclude that the deflating comes AFTER refs check. Why is this point glossed over?

No matter how much we tweet the media - and I have done my share and keep doing - the narrative will never change to what sells , which is anti pats rhetoric. Same crap happened after the KC game when people went nuts calling the demise of the team and brady being benched. Whatever sells. All these rational explanations are meaningless.
For e.g listen to Trey Wingo here with Rich Eisen. Esien repeatedly asks wingo if he can definitelvy say from the report brady asked someone to poke a football with a needle. but wingo never answers no .
http://www.richeisenshow.com/2015/0...flategate-investigation-on-the-re-show-51515/

ANGR89 said:

Oh I agree, but their twisting it to "the biggest game of the year their not going to be texting during the game about weight loss, it's about joking of what they do at home games" I'm in no way saying I agree, I'm just already the way their reporting that bit of information. I just think the Patriots have already lost in the court of public opinion, so I would stop trying to change their minds, because their already set, just let the courts decide. Because even if those texts seem guilty, I would think there's been enough holes in the well's report to throw these penalties out.

Click to expand...

Yes, just wait and see what comes next. There's no point in trying to decide what this meant, or that meant. Only they know for sure.

SVN said:

No matter how much we tweet the media - and I have done my share and keep doing - the narrative will never change to what sells , which is anti pats rhetoric. Same crap happened after the KC game when people went nuts calling the demise of the team and brady being benched. Whatever sells. All these rational explanations are meaningless.
For e.g listen to Trey Wingo here with Rich Eisen. Esien repeatedly asks wingo if he can definitelvy say from the report brady asked someone to poke a football with a needle. but wingo never answers no .
http://www.richeisenshow.com/2015/0...flategate-investigation-on-the-re-show-51515/

Click to expand...

I don't believe this will impact the story in the long-run. We are moving past the fallout phase of the Wells Report, and by next week, we'll be focusing on the highest profile law-suit in NFL history (Brady v. NFL). My guess is, people will be focusing instead on Due Process, the CBA, and concerns revolving around the powers of the Commissioner, rather than the "Deflator" defense.

I will never stop focusing on dorito dink

Keep in mind it was this text that prompted Wells to demand another interview with McNally. Yet because the Pats only offered a phone interview the NFL then deemed the Patriots as 'uncooperative' and used that as part of their justification for punishment.

Now read these email exchanges between Patriot legal counsel and Wells.
https://wellsreportcontext.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/nep_psi_excerpts-from-emails-5_15_15.pdf

Wells was already in possession of this text in his initial interview (read: interregaton) of McNally. This text does not rise to the level of 'new' or inculpatory evidence that warrants a second interview given the undue burden already endured by McNally.

Can you say railroaded? Sham? The NFL has gone out of their way to hang the Pats based on nothing.

This entire investigation and punishment really needs to go to court.
Edit: For reference, in the Wells report p86 item C.

I'm doing a Pats marathon of all games this season and I am up to the Packers game.

A female reporter,named Tracy, talking about Rodgers, says "As for Aaron Rodgers, he told me he likes the cold weather. He likes the grip and he likes a hard inflated football." She says this at 1st Quarter, 0:03 seconds left (clock stopped).