PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Patriots Legal Counsel Rebuttal of Wells Report


Status
Not open for further replies.


bill.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wtf is your problem? personally insulting me because I think 1 sentence in the entire rebuttal comes across as a weak argument, while in full support of everything else..

we're all dealing with enough BS with all this negative media attention, now we have to worry about friendly fire too? Go f*** yourself
No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.
 
You are making my point.
The only way to find guilt is to say everyone is lying. The only way to CREDIBLY say everyone is lying is to have EVIDENCE TO CONTRADICT. There is no evidence to contradict. The only 'evidence' is Wells interpretation of texts, which the texter and recipient explained and he called a lie.
Under that standard everyone is guilty of everytihng.
Did you do it?
No.
You are lying, you clearly did it. Based upon my disbelief of your answer you are clearly guilty.
I believe that was the line of reasoning used by Stalin.
 
No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.

Well then I apologize for overreacting.. I think it's obvious some of us are quite defensive lately with all this stuff haha
 
So is Mcnally the overweight one or JJ ? And who asked who deflate and give the jacket?

McNally is overweight. That's not obvious to you?
McNally told Jastremski to deflate and give the jacket.
 
McNally is overweight. That's not obvious to you?
McNally told Jastremski to deflate and give the jacket.
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflate :)
 
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflate :)

Im totally confused by what you are saying here. He means give the jacket to a player.
 
Im totally confused by what you are saying here. He means give the jacket to a player.
Ok Sorry got it. without the picture , just reading the text I assumed Mcnally wanted the jacket.
 
Based on rigorous scientific studies I've been conducting last night and this morning, I find that it is more probable than not that McNalley didn't wash his hands.

For that, we dock the New England Patriots an additional first round pick, in the 2016 NFL draft.
 
Oh I think it can certainly refer to weight loss and thay syncing of the text is amazing, but ultimately it's a weak defense in this case given how out of control this has all gotten.

If it's true, it's true. Not all truths are monumental.

As for the idea that it's a weak defense, that depends on what they have to support the assertion. If it's demonstrably the truth, it's as strong a defense as you can get.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.

We had to put something out there.

If the weight loss explanation is not true, and they know it's not true, it stands to reason (given the caliber of the people involved in this case) that they could have rationalized a better explanation. They didn't.

Why do you think that is?
 
no we didn't have to. we didn't have to explain everything. it really was a bad move because just look around. they don't talk about anything but the weight loss.

if i'm kraft, i'm furious.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.


I can't believe nobody in the room read that part and exercised common sense. Bummer for me.

But that Brady appeal letter was awesome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Back
Top