condon84
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,943
- Reaction score
- 4,126
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.Wtf is your problem? personally insulting me because I think 1 sentence in the entire rebuttal comes across as a weak argument, while in full support of everything else..
we're all dealing with enough BS with all this negative media attention, now we have to worry about friendly fire too? Go f*** yourself
I believe that was the line of reasoning used by Stalin.You are making my point.
The only way to find guilt is to say everyone is lying. The only way to CREDIBLY say everyone is lying is to have EVIDENCE TO CONTRADICT. There is no evidence to contradict. The only 'evidence' is Wells interpretation of texts, which the texter and recipient explained and he called a lie.
Under that standard everyone is guilty of everytihng.
Did you do it?
No.
You are lying, you clearly did it. Based upon my disbelief of your answer you are clearly guilty.
I believe that was the line of reasoning used by Stalin.
No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.
So is Mcnally the overweight one or JJ ? And who asked who deflate and give the jacket?
Nothing taken. My apologiesEdited post... was just my defensive overreaction.. nothing to see here folks!
So is Mcnally the overweight one or JJ ? And who asked who deflate and give the jacket?
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflateMcNally is overweight. That's not obvious to you?
McNally told Jastremski to deflate and give the jacket.
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflate
Ok Sorry got it. without the picture , just reading the text I assumed Mcnally wanted the jacket.Im totally confused by what you are saying here. He means give the jacket to a player.
Oh I think it can certainly refer to weight loss and thay syncing of the text is amazing, but ultimately it's a weak defense in this case given how out of control this has all gotten.
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.
the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.
this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.
and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/
this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.
we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.
the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.
this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.
and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/
this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.
we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.