Brian Baldinger: Evidence Not There, Clear Agenda against NE

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-netwo...he-appeal-will-be-Brady-s-best-game-plan-ever

great video. more and more people coming out to support NE. he basically says you can't connect a bunch of dots and say brady is guilty.

TommyBrady12 said:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-netwo...he-appeal-will-be-Brady-s-best-game-plan-ever

great video. more and more people coming out to support NE. he basically says you can't connect a million dots and aay brady is guilty.

Click to expand...

It's more like they added 2 and 2 and got 57.

It's amazing that that lady interviewing him can repeatedly claim that there's evidence that Tom wanted the balls deflated. Is it any wonder the public hates the Patriots when they're being brainwashed so consistently...

Wow! Baldinger is a Jets honk. Surprised he would defend Brady.

He crushed it.

Username said:

It's amazing that that lady interviewing him can repeatedly claim that there's evidence that Tom wanted the balls deflated. Is it any wonder the public hates the Patriots when they're being brainwashed so consistently...

Click to expand...

Bubble head. She was working at the Avon counter at Macy's 2 weeks ago.

I would have loved for him to ask that bimbo "did you read the report? If you had read the report you would have seen evidence on page 68 and 113, that the patriots balls were within expected ranges"

The media brought out the pitchforks from the start. Now that they see the carnage, now they want to acknowledge the weakness of the evidence?

Screw them all.

Unfortunately, I don't think it will be possible to prove the bias against the Pats, even thought it's clearly there. The lack of evidence however is an irrefutable fact that can bury the league...or at least I sure hope so.

RxJock1120 said:

Unfortunately, I don't think it will be possible to prove the bias against the Pats, even thought it's clearly there. The lack of evidence however is an irrefutable fact that can bury the league...or at least I sure hope so.

Click to expand...

If the bias is "clearly there", it will be possible to prove.

Deus Irae said:

If the bias is "clearly there", it will be possible to prove.

Click to expand...

Sue the league and subpoena the NFL Execs' and Well's email and cell phone records.

Deus Irae said:

If the bias is "clearly there", it will be possible to prove.

Click to expand...

I disagree, it can be evident, but having proof, ala emails from league to Wells, stating this probably don't exist. I am currently very sensitive about the need for actual proof, as opposed to assumptions.

I do not disagree that there was bias, just question our ability to prove it.

RxJock1120 said:

I disagree, it can be evident, but having proof, ala emails from league to Wells, stating this probably don't exist. I am currently very sensitive about the need for actual proof, as opposed to assumptions.

I do not disagree that there was bias, just question our ability to prove it.

Click to expand...

If the bias is "clearly there", the court will be able to see it. It's not as if there's no evidence.

robertweathers said:

Bubble head. She was working at the Avon counter at Macy's 2 weeks ago.

Click to expand...

Obviously SHE had an agenda, she used phrases like... 'strong evidence' 'the colts balls were inflated properly' 'maybe tom brady could have avoided this by coming clean in january' tom brady was good enough, he didn't need to do this' ....THIS BS is why i don't watch any of these shows, shes suppose to be an un-biased journalist searching for the truth.

Wow he killed it ! And didn't take whatever she said as gospel...like the balls were definitely deflated. When he said he read whole report, she could have said she read it all too...she didn't .

What is really bad is godell allowed a precedent to be set, that all you have to do is accuse the Pats and he will allow all hell to break loose.

Deus Irae said:

If the bias is "clearly there", the court will be able to see it. It's not as if there's no evidence.

Click to expand...

And is it illegal for the league to
1) treat some teams differently than others?
2) treat differently teams and ownership that has been found guilty of major transgressions in the last 10 years?

There is no question that patriots are treated different from other teams. I suspect that most owners (perhaps until this week) think that Goodell favors the patriots in his interactions with them.

Per Bedard: All the Patriots social media now have pictures of the back of Brady's uniform.

Someone needs to come out and challenge the "deflation happened though" BS. Everyone makes that assumption and even those in support of the Patriots haven't cleared this nonsense. There WAS no deflation. pV=nRT SHOWS that. They were under 12.5 due to the temperature drop. It would be breaking the laws of physics if they didn't! Why can't ANYONE in the media F*cking mention this!

reflexblue said:

Obviously she had an agenda, she used phrases like... 'strong evidence' 'the colts balls were inflated properly' 'maybe tom brady could have avoided this by coming clean in january' tom brady was good enough, he didn't need to do this' ....THIS BS is why i don't watch any of these shows, shes suppose to be an un-biased journalist searching for the truth.

Click to expand...

Unless it's pro-Patriots I have zero interest. I feel that strongly that the report was complete trash.

Until there is proof that TB12 orchestrated people to compromise footballs I have no interest in hearing the other side.

Deus Irae said:

Per Bedard: All the Patriots social media now have pictures of the back of Brady's uniform.

Click to expand...

Yep. Stacy James authorizes that only w/ approval from RK or JK.