- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,972
- Reaction score
- 14,473
I've been seeing more "there's two sides to this" than I remember during cameragate. Even at the outset they at least were going after the weasely language, although -- as was clearly the plan -- media outlets focused on the convenient and copy-able tweets.
It's not surprising that one of those tweets shows up in this "wait a minute" story (the one that more than anything I have been saying establishes a contrary narrative): A tweet saying that the target was 13 PSI, and the refs, ah say the refs, inflated a ball to 16.
The fact that they actually found the "Oh he must have remembered the wrong gauge" language is encouraging
This week's fodder? If so, we'll have to wait a while longer on "The Decision." More probably than not, anyway.
It's not surprising that one of those tweets shows up in this "wait a minute" story (the one that more than anything I have been saying establishes a contrary narrative): A tweet saying that the target was 13 PSI, and the refs, ah say the refs, inflated a ball to 16.
The fact that they actually found the "Oh he must have remembered the wrong gauge" language is encouraging
This week's fodder? If so, we'll have to wait a while longer on "The Decision." More probably than not, anyway.