BradyManny
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 11,103
- Reaction score
- 1,520
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.ESPN is reporting that Brady will be answering questions at 7:30 tonight. They say it will be fan questions picked out for him to answer.
The game you reference is the home game vs. the Jets. McNally would've been the last guy to touch the balls that game. Presumably, he's annoyed by Brady's standards on the balls. Unfortunately for the NFL, nowhere does anyone say that those standards are below 12.5. In fact, the bar is only set at 16 PSI. Yes, Brady wanted them below 16 PSI.
Im not seeing this anywhere???On ESPN?
To us. The general public, however, is very stupid when it comes to matters that don't directly affect their interests. They're even more stupid when it comes to matters which negatively affect something or someone they have a negative view on. So it's doubtful that most of the public actually read (forget about understands) the report.
ESPN is reporting that Brady will be answering questions at 7:30 tonight. They say it will be fan questions picked out for him to answer.
My apologies if this was posted, but it seems hell just froze over (i.e. Florio went to bat for the Patriots):
http://itiswhatitis.weei.com/sports...game-or-was-this-about-catching-the-patriots/
Why is the Sullivan guy not quoted and why arent their cell phone texts captured ?Sullivan -- in the well-distributed e-mail that put the game-operations people and officiating crew on alert to watch for football chicanery -- stated “it is well known around the league” that the Patriots alter footballs after they officials check them
How far did Wells go in trying to specify the chatter? Or was that moot? In which circles was it “well known” that the Patriots alter footballs? Among teams that might have an ax to grind?
Nowhere in Wells’ report are Pees and Rosburg cited, except in the list of interviewees.
Whether their testimony was damning, absolving or inconclusive, we don’t know. Wells doesn’t say. And, unless someone opens an investigation into the investigation, we won’t know.
Because here’s the thing: Nobody oversees the overseers.
@tomecurran Agree with @ESPN_Colin Don't think setting up the Pats was wrong. Even governments operate this way to catch illegal behavior.
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 17m17 minutes ago
Tom E. Curran retweeted Linda Cobra
Right. Like life-threatening, danger-to-society stuff. Crime.
Salem State.Im not seeing this anywhere???
Question: Why is it so hard to believe that the two Patriots ball boys could've done something without Brady's awareness when the two communicated privately together quite frequently, and in one game unbeknownst to Brady the balls came out like rugby balls?
The game you reference is the home game vs. the Jets. McNally would've been the last guy to touch the balls that game. Presumably, he's annoyed by Brady's standards on the balls. Unfortunately for the NFL, nowhere does anyone say that those standards are below 12.5. In fact, the bar is only set at 16 PSI. Yes, Brady wanted them below 16 PSI.
It's clear that Wells was presuming Colt and NFL innocence and didn't investigate them.http://www.csnne.com/new-england-pa...e-ravens-coaches-questioned-about-deflategate
Why is the Sullivan guy not quoted and why arent their cell phone texts captured ?
Todd Sullivan @ToddSullivan 1m1 minute ago
@RussianBear LOL.. Boston globe is now comparing Brady's "denial" press conference to Clinton's "denial" presser re: Lewinsky.
On ESPN?