Soul_Survivor88
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,131
- Reaction score
- 12,056
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I agree with it wholeheartily. Why isn't Kraft saying this?
You missed the most important line:
"How can Tommy defend himself? It's impossible," Brady Sr. said. "This is so distorted. To have something come out like this and say it's more probable than not? What does that mean?
Ain't that the damn truth, how in the **** can one defend themselves when this is the finding. Absolutely ****ing insane. "More probably than not." Really?
Okay, I hope the NFL tries to suspend Brady the NFLPA will laugh them out of court/arbitration.
No, no they won't. Trust me. The 31 other teams and 3 others in the AFCE will ensure Brady is suspended for as long as possible. This truly isn't a sports league. It's a waa waa I need help to win league. So, the NFLPA will capitulate because it will hurt the Patriots. Now, Manning will be discussed as the GOAT. Never cheated right? Don't let facts stand in the way.
Once again, the NFL, the owners, the other players can all do what they want to try to make Brady die a slow painful death...but regardless of that the NFLPA will defend Brady just like they defended the scumbags last year like Ray Rice and got him reinstated.
Trust me, Brady will not be suspended when week 1 rolls around. The NFL can try, there is NO chance the NFLPA allows that to stand based on "he probably did it more than not." That won't fly with any legitimate lawyer.
i dont know how in hell you can say that after everything thats happened with the nfl and goodell. you are trying to apply logic and common sense to a organization that has none. it will fly and the pats will take it right up the -ssTrust me, Brady will not be suspended when week 1 rolls around. The NFL can try, there is NO chance the NFLPA allows that to stand based on "he probably did it more than not." That won't fly with any legitimate lawyer.
Your mistake is, and while I respect your statement, do you think that will matter? Brady isn't good for the NFLPA. Manning was/is sadly enough. Luck, Wilson, are the future. If and when they can prove the chances of those while hurting Brady they will. Trust me. Ray Rice wasn't an impediment to those listed. Ditto Peterson. Remember, Von Miller coerced his piss tester to change his sample. Coerced. He got a season, then dropped to 6. He cheated a drug test. That reduction was due to Manning.
i dont know how in hell you can say that after everything thats happened with the nfl and goodell. you are trying to apply logic and common sense to a organization that has none. it will fly and the pats will take it right up the -ss
i dont know how in hell you can say that after everything thats happened with the nfl and goodell. you are trying to apply logic and common sense to a organization that has none. it will fly and the pats will take it right up the -ss
Your mistake is, and while I respect your statement, do you think that will matter? Brady isn't good for the NFLPA. Manning was/is sadly enough. Luck, Wilson, are the future. If and when they can prove the chances of those while hurting Brady they will. Trust me. Ray Rice wasn't an impediment to those listed. Ditto Peterson. Remember, Von Miller coerced his piss tester to change his sample. Coerced. He got a season, then dropped to 6. He cheated a drug test. That reduction was due to Manning.
i dont know how in hell you can say that after everything thats happened with the nfl and goodell. you are trying to apply logic and common sense to a organization that has none. it will fly and the pats will take it right up the -ss
Why should anyone "trust" you any more than any other poster. His argument is a lot more sound about the NFLPA defending Brady based on questionable evidence. They defended Ray Rice, so they too will stand up for Brady. Anything that attempts to weaken the union's power will be addressed. I expect a fine.Your mistake is, and while I respect your statement, do you think that will matter? Brady isn't good for the NFLPA. Manning was/is sadly enough. Luck, Wilson, are the future. If and when they can prove the chances of those while hurting Brady they will. Trust me. Ray Rice wasn't an impediment to those listed. Ditto Peterson. Remember, Von Miller coerced his piss tester to change his sample. Coerced. He got a season, then dropped to 6. He cheated a drug test. That reduction was due to Manning.
I agree with this, they have no proof or evidence Brady did anything wrong. The Wells Report did not PROVE Brady did anything wrong nor did they provide EVIDENCE that he did anything wrong, EXCEPT, lie about knowing that one locker room worker.The NFL and Goodell are the exact opposite of the NFLPA. The NFLPA hates the owners and Goodell as much as some of the Pats fans here do. The spin here is silly.
The NFL has no case for actual suspension...so if they actually try to suspend Tom Brady, it will be must watch stuff cause it will be so hilarious.
I agree with this, they have no proof or evidence Brady did anything wrong. The Wells Report did not PROVE Brady did anything wrong nor did they provide EVIDENCE that he did anything wrong, EXCEPT, lie about knowing that one locker room worker.