Best roster in the NFL? Heres your answer!

Patriots? Packers? Seahawks you ask? Hell no! It's......the Buffalo Bills!! Chris Sims is a certifiable moron. Defensively they may be top 5, but offensively? He'd take McCoy, Woods, Clay, Watkins etc as much as Gronk, Chandler, Edleman, Amendola etc.

I really question how some of these people have media jobs. I see more knowledgable and straightforward ideas on this forum than I do from most talking heads.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...lo-bills-may-have-most-talented-roster-in-nfl

Here's the genius himself:

Ice_Ice_Brady said:

Here's the genius himself:

Click to expand...

Hahah nice. The last one is where his idea about the Bills belongs.

The Bills' starting quarterback is Matt Cassel.

primetime said:

The Bills' starting quarterback is Matt Cassel.

Click to expand...

Is he good? Do Bills fans have hope? Wait, isn't he Brady's old backup that threw 3 picks second week against da Pats this year? Haha.

Sammy Watkins might end up being the great stud he was supposed to be but based on how amazingly deep last year's WR class was and how much success lower round WR picks had the Bills really wasted a lot of resources moving up to get Watkins.

I gotta say if the Bills had a good QB this wouldn't be too far off.

But uhh no QB so...

Come on, altogether now....its not about the accumulation of talent but the building of a team....

It's ok if we have the 32nd roster in the league as long as we have the number 1 team.

Man, all these teams keep winning the SB in March I don't know why they even have the regular season any more since we all know Washington or Miami will win it all.

Given the importance of the Quarterback position, you simply cannot make an argument for the Bills having the or one of the best rosters in the NFL. If the Bills had a better QB, you could easily position the argument that they have a very good roster.

I know I'm going to be called crazy but I wouldn't be surprised if Bills win 11 or more games this year.
I think the teams they will lose to are the Colts and PATS ( may even split with the PATS)
other difficult teams are Texans, Bengals, Eagles, Cowboys but three of those are home games.
This a team with lots of talent and they still have the draft. Rex's Defense is always good and
Greg Roman has the potential to bring a lot of innovation to that Bills offense which has a ton
of talent. Don't underestimate Greg Roman, from what I've read he's very smart, innovative and
his play calling is timely.

ViperGTS said:

Patriots? Packers? Seahawks you ask? Hell no! It's......the Buffalo Bills!! Chris Sims is a certifiable moron. Defensively they may be top 5, but offensively? He'd take McCoy, Woods, Clay, Watkins etc as much as Gronk, Chandler, Edleman, Amendola etc.

I really question how some of these people have media jobs. I see more knowledgable and straightforward ideas on this forum than I do from most talking heads.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...lo-bills-may-have-most-talented-roster-in-nfl

Click to expand...

I'm not sure what your issue is here? I mean Gronkowski is great, Edelman is very good, but Chandler is an average NFL TE, Amendola is a subpar depth WR at best and we have question marks at RB. Buffalo is talented they just aren't talented at the most important position the QB. As for the rest, I think you are wrong to try and gripe over this because we speaking to talent (which is different than performance) the players on the Bills offensive are more talented than everyone outside of Gronkowski on are team.

ausbacker said:

Given the importance of the Quarterback position, you simply cannot make an argument for the Bills having the or one of the best rosters in the NFL. If the Bills had a better QB, you could easily position the argument that they have a very good roster.

Click to expand...

Browns, Rams, and Texans all fall into a similar category. Very talented rosters, big questions at the QB position.

VectorPrime said:

Sammy Watkins might end up being the great stud he was supposed to be but based on how amazingly deep last year's WR class was and how much success lower round WR picks had the Bills really wasted a lot of resources moving up to get Watkins.

Click to expand...

Could have had Beckham and had a 1st and 4th this year.

JR4 said:

This a team with lots of talent and they still have the draft.

Click to expand...

No 1st or 4th round pick

primetime said:

The Bills' starting quarterback is Matt Cassel.

Click to expand...

Who led a talented roster to an 11-5 record in 2008 and another talented roster to a 10-5 record in 2010. Cassell is a capable QB, he isn't an elite QB but when surrounded with good players he can play in the 12-18 range of starting QBs.

JMC00 said:

Could have had Beckham and had a 1st and 4th this year.

Click to expand...

We could have had Richard Sherman and we took Ras-I Dowling. Glass houses my friend, every team ****s up in the draft. Watkins is a good player, I wouldn't have made the trade but I can't knock it, they could have done worse.

Just voted for the Bills. This narrative can only help the Pats.

Brady6 said:

We could have had Richard Sherman and we took Ras-I Dowling. Glass houses my friend, every team ****s up in the draft. Watkins is a good player, I wouldn't have made the trade but I can't knock it, they could have done worse.

Click to expand...

Pats gave up a 1st and 4th to move up to get Dowling?

Ya didn't think so. Shut up.