Colts proposed rule change

SHOWTIME15 · Mar 22, 2015

ctpatsfan77 said:
Didn't BB get the "taller goal posts" rule passed?

they begrudgingly passed that and it turned out to be right. every year it's the same thing "we don't think BB's rule change are good for the game." I think a lot of it is because league insiders don't like him. He's successful and embarrasses everyone.

Joker · Mar 22, 2015

here's MY proposed rule change....no more ****in' drug addict, drunk, midwestern team owners allowed in the NFL...it's like the damned Koch brothers have bought half this league up as these wingnut whackjob attempts to hijack every season with these mongoloidal proposals proliferate like stinking cow pies left out in the sun for a month.

Gwedd · Mar 22, 2015

Well, to be candid, I proposed that, on the kickoff, if the kicker manages to place the ball across the bar between the uprights, in the same manner as a FG or PAT, then the kicking team gets awarded 1 point. Everything else continues as normal. The ball comes out to the 20 yard line, any fouls that ocurred are still called, etc. The only change is that if the ball goes through the uprights on a kickoff, the kicking team gets 1 point.

Brady_to_Moss · Mar 22, 2015

patman12 said:
Was he really ever off of them?

No..but could have went from 5 a day to 3?!

slam · Mar 22, 2015

My proposed rule change is that the team with the worst record in the league is ineligible for receiving the #1 pick. They will be assigned the #10 pick. This includes teams tied for the worst record. So if three teams share the worst 3-13 record, a team with the 4-12 record will get the #1 pick while the 3-13 teams will get picks # 10-12.

Froob · Mar 22, 2015

slam said:
My proposed rule change is that the team with the worst record in the league is ineligible for receiving the #1 pick. They will be assigned the #10 pick. This includes teams tied for the worst record. So if three teams share the worst 3-13 record, a team with the 4-12 record will get the #1 pick while the 3-13 teams will get picks # 10-12.

And what problem does this fix?

jmt57 · Mar 22, 2015

Froob said:
And what problem does this fix?

Sucking for Luck

Joker · Mar 22, 2015

"Hey Rog, I GOT it!!!! Let's use Jim Irsay to get them dyamned Patree-otts good...can't miss this time!!!!"---Mike "Scumbag Anus-tunnel of the Century" Kensil.

It just never ceases to amaze me how depraved and utterly bereft of morals the NFL offices heirarchy is...

Froob · Mar 22, 2015

jmt57 said:
Sucking for Luck

Yeah but tanking rarely happens in the NFL. That causes more problems then it solves.

Ice_Ice_Brady · Mar 22, 2015

Froob said:
Yeah but tanking rarely happens in the NFL. That causes more problems then it solves.

Except it did happen when it just so happened the #1 pick was a sure-fire Hall of Fame quarterback and the Colts will reap the benefits for the next fifteen years.

Joker · Mar 22, 2015

and NOW the New York NFL mongoloid army comes up with THIS!!! Just unfrickenbelievable..

http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-...undown-of-chances-for-patriots-rule-proposals

Fixed cameras on boundary lines (proposal No. 12): “I’m not optimistic that one gets passed because every stadium is configured differently, and to construct camera locations and whatnot, I just don’t know if there is a need to do that.”

WHAT???????????????????????????????????????

just amazing how ignorant these ultra rich, insulated douchebags think we are..."every stadium is configured different????????????????????????????????????????????????".....HUH? The field is a rectangle of EXACT proportions in all 32 venues. Jeezus krist, this mutt is either on drugs or suffering from SBCL (Sudden Brain Cell Loss)."construct camera locations and WHATNOT"...holy krist, like this is some earth shattering quantum theory puzzle or something.

We all know what this really is...MORE NYC/NYNFL centric boolshyt...these goons are running amok.

JMC00 · Mar 22, 2015

ctpatsfan77 said:
Didn't BB get the "taller goal posts" rule passed?

Ya but the committee would look complete bias if they didn't approve something as simple as that

More cameras to help replay and it's not going to get voted against 2 years in a row. $9bn league and they vote against fixed cameras to help replay because why?

Joker · Mar 22, 2015

JMC00 said:
Ya but the committee would look complete bias if they didn't approve something as simple as that

More cameras to help replay gets voted against 9-0. $9bn league and they vote against fixed cameras to help replay because why?

well....maybe we should ask John Clayton since he's obviously made of the same genetic material as Mara...

slam · Mar 22, 2015

Froob said:
And what problem does this fix?

Making Jaguars games more entertaining.

Crazy Patriot Guy · Mar 23, 2015

Ice_Ice_Brady said:
Except it did happen when it just so happened the #1 pick was a sure-fire Hall of Fame quarterback and the Colts will reap the benefits for the next fifteen years.

But how often does a can't miss player like Luck come around? It's rare that the top overall player is a consensus pick before the season even starts (and stays that way) and VERY rare to have a prospect with so few questions. I don't like the idea of a rule change that will punish the truly worst team in football year after year for that one season the next can't miss guy comes along.

Joker · Mar 23, 2015

OUR coach chimes in on the NFL "Parade Of Idiots"....

"3. The Patriots again proposed boundary cameras to which are fixed on the sidelines, end zone and end line. The league has, without irony, said that the expense of the cameras is one of the sticking points. This gives us a chance to revisit the Best of Belichick from the 2014 owner’s meetings when talking about the NFL moaning about the cost. "We just spent however many millions of dollars on the replay system. I mean, there are 1,000 cameras in every stadium, so if somebody spills a beer on somebody, we have it on record, right? Maybe we could have a bake sale to raise some money for the cameras. We could do a car wash."

Truly a league full of pinheaded scumbag owners.....

Username · Mar 23, 2015

Joker said:
and NOW the New York NFL mongoloid army comes up with THIS!!! Just unfrickenbelievable..

http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-...undown-of-chances-for-patriots-rule-proposals

Fixed cameras on boundary lines (proposal No. 12): “I’m not optimistic that one gets passed because every stadium is configured differently, and to construct camera locations and whatnot, I just don’t know if there is a need to do that.”

WHAT???????????????????????????????????????

just amazing how ignorant these ultra rich, insulated douchebags think we are..."every stadium is configured different????????????????????????????????????????????????".....HUH? The field is a rectangle of EXACT proportions in all 32 venues. Jeezus krist, this mutt is either on drugs or suffering from SBCL (Sudden Brain Cell Loss)."construct camera locations and WHATNOT"...holy krist, like this is some earth shattering quantum theory puzzle or something.

We all know what this really is...MORE NYC/NYNFL centric boolshyt...these goons are running amok.

This is the quote that stood out for me

Bill Belichick is as smart a coach as there is in the game and is always coming up with different strategies. The one they used against Baltimore was ingenious and certainly within the rules. The question is, do we want that going forward? Probably the majority of coaches say no. You can ask them.

So in other words being smarter than your colleagues and having a deeper, more profound knowledge of the game, it's intricacies and rules is frowned upon. Ingenuity is not to be encouraged as it creates an unfair advantage to the clever folks, even it is 100% legit and within the rules.

wizwor · Mar 23, 2015

Jlaff said:
LOL, why did they stop there? Maybe if the midfield 2nd PAT is successful, they should receive the ensuing kick-off too.

and a draft pick

Froob · Mar 23, 2015

slam said:
Making Jaguars games more entertaining.

There's a difference between tanking and sucking. Plus the players don't tank. They aren't going to play any harder than they were.

ThatllMoveTheChains!!! · Mar 23, 2015

Joker said:
OUR coach chimes in on the NFL "Parade Of Idiots"....

"3. The Patriots again proposed boundary cameras to which are fixed on the sidelines, end zone and end line. The league has, without irony, said that the expense of the cameras is one of the sticking points. This gives us a chance to revisit the Best of Belichick from the 2014 owner’s meetings when talking about the NFL moaning about the cost. "We just spent however many millions of dollars on the replay system. I mean, there are 1,000 cameras in every stadium, so if somebody spills a beer on somebody, we have it on record, right? Maybe we could have a bake sale to raise some money for the cameras. We could do a car wash."

Truly a league full of pinheaded scumbag owners.....

They apparently have spent their integrity budget on investigating the psi of footballs.

Meanwhile they'll keep the PAT as is wasting 10 minutes per TD on a meaningless play while preaching about game length when talking about reviews.

Colts proposed rule change

No asterisks

PatsFans.com Supporter

PatsFans.com Supporter

28-3....

In the Starting Line-Up

Independent Investigator & pliable af

Moderator

PatsFans.com Supporter

Independent Investigator & pliable af

I heard 10,000 whispering and nobody listening

PatsFans.com Supporter

Pro Bowl Player

PatsFans.com Supporter

In the Starting Line-Up

In the Starting Line-Up

PatsFans.com Supporter

2nd Team Getting Their First Start

Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

Independent Investigator & pliable af

In the Starting Line-Up

Similar threads