PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

The Patriots Couldn't and Shouldn't Match the Jets Offer to Darrelle Revis - READ THIS


Status
Not open for further replies.

Rich<3TheWoodhead

Practice Squad Player
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
164
Reaction score
65
Article written by Rich Hill from PatsPulpit.com perfectly explains why re-signing Darrelle Revis for what he wanted was impossible.
This made me understand why the Patriots never really had a chance with revis. And if they did it would be Team-SUICIDE.
Sorry to post an article from another Patriots fan site but it truly makes me feel much better about the situation and why it played out this way.
http://www.patspulpit.com/2015/3/11...match-jets-offer-to-darrelle-revis-salary-cap

Let's clarify: Darrelle Revis is still an elite cornerback, if not the best cornerback in the league. He was a key member of the Patriots Super Bowl team and his impact and output won't soon be forgotten.

But after looking at the Jets offer, the Patriots had no chance to keep Revis. He was gone.

When the Jets said they'd open up the pocketbook to sign Revis, they weren't bluffing. They gave him the entire bank vault.

New York offered a five year deal, valued at $70 million, with $39 million fully guaranteed, no ifs, ands, or buts. He gets that money if he's injured. He gets that money if he's cut. That $39 million is all his. His base salary is $16 million, $17 million, and $14 million over the next three seasons.

This is why the Patriots balked.

New England structures their deals with signing bonuses in order to spread the cap hit across the life of the contract, while also putting in protection language that would require the player to be on the roster at the start of each league year. It's this protection language that caused the divide between Revis and the Patriots to grow- he wanted his money with no strings attached, which the Patriots couldn't offer, but the Jets were more than willing to provide.

According to PatsCap, if the Patriots tried to match the Jets "pay as you go" contract structure, Revis' cap hit would be $21 million due to the $16 million base salary, plus the $5 million outstanding from last season's signing bonus.

The Patriots currently have $13.6 million in cap space, per PatsCap, which would mean the Patriots would have to free up a minimum of $2.4 million in cap space to match the Jets offer, while leaving the Patriots at major risk if Revis were to be injured. This would also leave the Patriots with no cap space to fill any holes opened by freeing up the $2.4 million in cap space.

For reference, Dont'a Hightower accounts for $2.5 million in cap space. This is some crucial cap space.

The cap hit would also stand at $17 million next season, when the Patriots will have to address potential contract extension for Chandler Jones, Dont'a Hightower, Nate Solder, Jamie Collins, and other key members of the roster.


The Patriots would never have exposed themselves to such a high level of guaranteed money with no strings attached. They shouldn't be expected to, either, if they want to field a team with the depth required of every championship roster.

Revis will forever be remembered for his 2014 season, but there's no way the Patriots were going to match the Jets offer.

Sign revis = no possible way to resign Jones/Hightower/Solder etc.
 
I wish more people on this website read that article and stop accusing the Patriots of being "cheap, moronic, stupid" etc. Doing the deal would have been "moronic, stupid, etc"
Very true. It's a matter of how Revis likes to get paid. He wants his cash to equal the cap hit. If he performs at a high level, as he has his entire career, he makes a fortune. The only reasonable way for NE to re-sign him was to offer signing bonus money to spread out and he didn't want that. So they part ways and the NYJ have a bunch of cap space and can welcome him back with open arms.
 
I rather have depth instead of Revis. In other words i rather have Culliver, Shread, and 2 others FA instead of Revis. He is great, but not a 14+m CB. Hes 3 years and 48m and 39 gtd is too much.
 
I rather have depth instead of Revis. In other words i rather have Culliver, Shread, and 2 others FA instead of Revis. He is great, but not a 14+m CB. Hes 3 years and 48m and 39 gtd is too much.
Which just might happen.
 
i would love to see a simple poll: Should the Patriots have matched the Jets offer to Revis? Just a simple yes or no. (I'm just with my phone now and posting on it can be a little wonky). My sense is the board is about evenly divided.
 
No on Culliver. Guy's a douche*50.
 
The author is obviously JAO (Just Another Ostrich).
 
I'm more upset about losing Browner in addition to Revis but I guess we'll see.
 
I feel like this one-and-done experience has proven that the only way to win a Super Bowl is one of 3 ways:
1. Sneek into playoffs with a gutsy team that can luck-out and play clutch at the right time (Baltimore)
2. Build young team by have 2-3 consecutive excellent drafts (Seattle)
3. Build a great team and gets some merinaries to load up for 1 or 2 years max. (Pats)

The idea of keeping this team together for just one more run was tantilizing...but not at the cost of losing the Hightowers/Collins/Solder type core players for the long haul.
Thank god I don't have to make these decisions...I'll leave them to BB.
 
The Pats could have given him a a$50 million signing bonus and the cap hit would have been $10M this year. The other $5M in cap hits is from last year and has nothing to do with his new deal. Obv they wouldnt give him that right now but the point is there are ways to work with the cap. To say they couldn't do it is just wrong.
 
I'm more upset about losing Browner in addition to Revis but I guess we'll see.

I feel like Browner is a perfect #2 corner in a man-to-man defense because his physicality (often getting beat) requires some safety help. If we ask for more than that (losing Revis and then having Dennard/Arrington/Butler on the other side and needing more safety help)...then it may be a recipe or disaster. I won't mind if lose Browner but just get stronger with better #2-4 CB play. I just pray we don't get a Wheatley, Wilhite, Ras-I redux.
 
I'm more upset about losing Browner in addition to Revis but I guess we'll see.
This is what pushed me to the ledge. I would've had a lot easier time accepting the loss of Revis if we still had Browner. I keep having flashbacks to those putrid secondaries post-2009.
 
Folks the problem here is the lack of depth in talent when it comes to the dline and the secondary. This team has lack of players in that department and dont give chandler jones. Over the years they have struck out in that department. We are back to the same broken record.
 
The Pats could have given him a a$50 million signing bonus and the cap hit would have been $10M this year. The other $5M in cap hits is from last year and has nothing to do with his new deal. Obv they wouldnt give him that right now but the point is there are ways to work with the cap. To say they couldn't do it is just wrong.

In theory. The issue is not the Patriots. Revis wanted the deal HIS way and on HIS terms. The Patriots won't deviate from how they operate the business. This is why the Patriots are the Patriots and the Jets the Jets
 
The Pats could have given him a a$50 million signing bonus and the cap hit would have been $10M this year. The other $5M in cap hits is from last year and has nothing to do with his new deal. Obv they wouldnt give him that right now but the point is there are ways to work with the cap. To say they couldn't do it is just wrong.

Ultimately the key point that was mentioned yesterday by various reporters and was also touched upon in that article is that the Jets were offering a fully guaranteed amount and the Patriots wanted some protective language because thats part of their philosophy.

Thats why they knew on Monday that it wont work out and let Browner explore his options.

The money obviously was also an issue but there could have been ways around that. But there was no way around the guaranteed money issue.

End of story, nobody is cheap and both sides did what they consider better for themselves.
 
This is what pushed me to the ledge. I would've had a lot easier time accepting the loss of Revis if we still had Browner. I keep having flashbacks to those putrid secondaries post-2009.

Browner is a liability without a great press corner as his complement. You don't want him running around on the field in zone coverage or whatever we will be doing this year.
 
The divide on this board is between those who like the idea of being competitive in 5 years vs those who can only think about more SBs for Brady and belichick. Could we have drawn up a contract for revis that wouldn't have forced us to give up too much this year? Probably. But say goodbye to at the very minimum of 2 of Jones/Hightower/Collins/Solder over the next few years. And once Brady and revis are done we are left with nearly nothing to build around on either side of the ball.
 
I think the contract would have handcuffed us. In today's NFL you can't allocate that kind of money to one player (non-QB) and win a championship.

Revis - I'm very disappointed in him, i know he took the money now. But, he's going to a team that can't win championships. I'm not sure it's worth for a few extra million in guaranteed money to somewhat hurt his legacy. He's a great player, but he saw with a mediocare coach and a great coach how better his career is going to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top