JJDChE
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 2,488
- Reaction score
- 534
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd rather have Revis and the receiving corps from Foxborough High, than Johnson and no Revis.
If he comes here on the cheap it wouldn't take much to make him a bargain. 40-50 catches. Not a lot for a guy like him who can still play.
If he wants to get paid he'll have to suit up somewhere else.
Being told that you're a 40 catch guy next year by a coach who has been in town like, 10 years less than you, is probably a huge bitter pill to swallow.
Going to a SB contender and catching 40 footballs will probably feel a lot different to him. Pride can be fickle.
Thankfully it appears that Johnson will not demand a 'No Revises' clause in his contract.
It's hilarious when people say that like Bill would choose a WR over Revis. News flash Johnson isn't getting that type of money from anyone.
I'd welcome him with open arms. I love all the comments stating his production in crappy houston, stop comparing guys who play for different tier qb's and systems. Johnson would have easily broke a 1000 with TB. That being said I see him signing elsewhere for more coin.
Solid post. He wouldn't crack a 1000 due to the spread it around system is well put, but when you need a play on the fly AJ is your guy. And I agree that he could produce at a lafell and Edelman level as I think his decline is more about lack of motivation rather than ability.The QB absolutely matters, but sometime a bad QB is masked by the WR being the only, or 1 of 2 targets all season. The worst QB in the NFL can make a receiver look good if he targets him 180 times in a season.
Andre Johnson is not the player he once was, but he's still more than our #3 WR and could probably produce at the same level that LaFell or close to Edelman with TB at QB at his age.
But he also might not hit 1,000 with TB simply because we had 4 viable targets last season and he would have been 1 of 5 targets (Gronk, Vereen, Edelman, LaFell + a hypothetical Johnson), hard to produce 1,000 yard seasons when the ball is spread around so widely.
I'd love to have 4 guys putting up 800-1200 yard seasons over 2 guys giving you 1000+ and nothing to follow.
Agree he is almost guaranteed to be a Raven, Falcon, or Colt.johnson wouldn't be happy here. The dude wants 90+ passes a year, and hes not going to get that in our system.
johnson wouldn't be happy here. The dude wants 90+ passes a year, and hes not going to get that in our system.
Not true. He wants to win a Championship or at least play in one. He's never come close to it and hes been in the league a long time. I truly believe he would give up some stats for that opportunity.johnson wouldn't be happy here. The dude wants 90+ passes a year, and hes not going to get that in our system.
Somehow I don't think Bill sees a major "need" to draft a WR. I think it's more of a board/media driven philosophy.How about Browner for Hunter?
Deep threat solved, no need to draft a receiver.
Focus on offensive and defensive line of course unless Gurley drops.