- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 19,712
- Reaction score
- 31,139
I'll be the first to say I'm a big Ridley supporter, I think I've made that clear with some of my past posts, and truthfully I think people miss the point that Ridley and Blount are really a best case scenario. Ridley's quickness and ability to hit the hole with speed and his vision is something that has been one of his best assets, and that's something that they were really lacking at times during the season. Obviously they won the Super Bowl without him and it's easy for us to get blinded by the end result - which is one that a lot of good players (ie: Mayo) end up with people pondering life without them with fans, media, etc.
This kid's a great kid. He's always kept a good attitude, you see him out with his teammates in a positive manner, doesn't make an idiot out of himself on social networks, and aside from 2013 when he struggled (and I agree, a couple of the fumbles weren't completely his fault) he's been a solid back. He was running well before he went down and I feel like he's an asset that they really need. Obviously bringing him back with something to prove I think will be a good thing, but I'd like to see him back in a lead role with Blount next season if he's healthy.
This kid's a great kid. He's always kept a good attitude, you see him out with his teammates in a positive manner, doesn't make an idiot out of himself on social networks, and aside from 2013 when he struggled (and I agree, a couple of the fumbles weren't completely his fault) he's been a solid back. He was running well before he went down and I feel like he's an asset that they really need. Obviously bringing him back with something to prove I think will be a good thing, but I'd like to see him back in a lead role with Blount next season if he's healthy.