PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Finally! Curran's great article today clearly names Kensil and mocks the NFL


Kensil got alerted for one reason, he left the booth one time. Why measure Patriot balls after an official is caught stealing balls?

Because the alternate official was told that if there's anything at all fishy going on with the footballs vis a vis the Pats, give him a call. The alt-ref was handed an unmarked ball to place into the game rotation by a guy wearing Pats gear. At that moment, the alt-ref doesn't know about any ball stealing. He just knows something seems fishy so he calls Kensil.
 
a football that had been intercepted by linebacker D’Qwell Jackson allegedly seemed to be underinflated.
There's that passive voice again - "the football seemed". Since we now have the established fact that Jackson did not detect any defect in the ball, who was it to whom it "seemed" underinflated? Some actual individual made that perception and decided to act upon it. Who?
 
Some comments on the comments:

1. Nice job by Curran to completely dismiss "Kballgate" and get Jim Kensil's name and agenda firmly in the spot light. However it does nothing to dismiss "deflategate" one way or the other. We will still be twisting in the wind on that one for the next couple of months.

2. Given the league's incompetence, it looks at this point that it will be very hard for the league to prove any wrong doing on the Pats. However that isn't the issue. Its not enough for the Pats to be found not guilty, they need to be found INNOCENT. So more work has to be done on that.

3. If over the next month Brady and BB AREN'T interviewed by Welles, then ie will be a good indication that complete vindication has a real chance of happening.

4. This article was a nice start, but JUST a start of what needs to be done.

5. I've said this several times before, and will likely say it many more times in the future, what HAS to be done at a MINIMUM is: 1. Kensil needs to be fired 2. Irsay and the Colts organization needs to punished. 3. Bob Kraft, Brady and BB all need personal apologies from BOTH the league and ESPN.

6. Interesting take on Jim McNally. I'd take a little harsher view. If I were McNally, I'd be trying to figure just how big a piece of ESPN I wanted to own
Ahh....."The Jim McNally Sports Network". It's got a nice ring to it.:cool:
 
There's that passive voice again - "the football seemed". Since we now have the established fact that Jackson did not detect any defect in the ball, who was it to whom it "seemed" underinflated? Some actual individual made that perception and decided to act upon it. Who?


Turkeyneck, that was not MY quote. That was in the Florio article.
 
It's now being reported Roger Goodell and other NFL officials are, as we speak, in a high level closed door meeting discussing the issue of "Deflategate". While a full transcript of the meeting will obviously not be made available to the public, an unnamed source has provided the following verbatim exchange between Goodell and Kensil:"Whose on first?" "I don't know" "Third Base!"
 
Turkeyneck, that was not MY quote. That was in the Florio article.
I know. I didn't mean to imply it was you, shmessy.

My commentary was about the style of reporting that's endemic, always using the passive voice. The truth of DFG is to be found by digging past the passive voice and asking the question, who? Footballs don't seem deflated, someone perceives them to be deflated. The football is not the actor, the someone is the actor and finding out who that someone is is at the heart of this mess.
 
One more bit of craziness for the whole story -- Sharks of Vegas claims that Kensil's son used to work for Florio.
 
On the read earlier today and caught Ben Volin on the radio. Volin has now fallen into the crowd that knows that the NFL is unlikely to prove anything against the Pats, but that doesn't mean they didn't do something. On the plus side, he thinks the whole affair was overblown and unnecessary from the start.

BTW- none of that shocks or surprises me. He's a pretentious little turd to start with. However then he mentioned something that at first made sense, but the more I thought about it, it could be the smoking gun that blows this out of the water.

When the talk turned to the Kensil conspiracy theory, Volin expressed skepticism because he questioned why would he have re-inflated the balls at half time, thus destroying the evidence that the Pats had done anything wrong.

Then it struck me (for I am getting a little slower every year), that by re-inflating the balls at the half, what Kensil was ACTUALLY doing was destroying the proof of the Pats INNOCENCE. If it was true that the balls were only marginally deflated, if at all, Kensil's sting and his biased agenda becomes exposed. By just saying he re-inflated then, he not only destroys the only way the Pats could have conclusively proved their innocence, he is free to imply that the ball needed to be inflated and the Pats had done something.....and there is no way for the Pats conclusively prove otherwise, as the evidence has been essentially destroyed

Kensil doesn't need to have the Pats found guilty to win. He just needs the possibility of wrong doing to taint the Pats irreparably. and by destroying the evidence he succeeded. Also Volin's take might have had more legitimacy if all those continually negative phrased leaks hadn't been coming from the league office, even after Goodell demanded they stop.

So someone needs to get Welles to ask, why did Kensil re-inflate the balls, which not only makes finding the Pats guilty impossible, but finding them innocent as well. He also needs to find the sources of all those damaging but erroneous leaks, That's very, very fishy behavior from the guy who is supposed to be in charge of league operations.
 
1/25
Sharks of Vegas‏@SharksOfVegas
Mike Kensil, remember that name guys.......

1/25
Sharks of Vegas‏@SharksOfVegas
BREAKING -Source CONFIRMS NFL Investigation is more about the officials than the Patriots.

Today:
Sharks of Vegas ‏@SharksOfVegas 15m15 minutes ago
Unless he can find a scapegoat, Mike Kensil is going to get fired guys.

I believe SoV also stated that their sources were telling them that the NFL had nothing on the Patriots, that there would be no sanctions and that there would be a quick (within a couple days) resolution. The last part obviously didn't happen but I don't ding them or their sources for how something this political has played out.
 
All these people deserve each other.

Picture their faces when the Butler did it. Just thinking about it keeps that grin on my face.

The 1969 Celtics and 2001 Pats are my favorite championships, but this one just might belong there too.

It wasn't just the winning, but the way they won after all the hate came gushing out.
 
Because the alternate official was told that if there's anything at all fishy going on with the footballs vis a vis the Pats, give him a call. The alt-ref was handed an unmarked ball to place into the game rotation by a guy wearing Pats gear. At that moment, the alt-ref doesn't know about any ball stealing. He just knows something seems fishy so he calls Kensil.
There's a few reasons why I don't buy this.

1. Blandino says the officials knew nothing about it. Maybe he lied, but they also acted like they knew nothing about it. Didn't log pressure, didn't watch the ball boy, etc.

2. It's not how normal people act. We have an official who found the missing ball and handed it to McNally, we have McNally, and we have Miller. All three (at least) have information on why McNally has the ball. But Kensil doesn't ask them? Even if it's true the official called Kensil over McNally merely handing him a ball (which seems unlikely) the very first thing anyone would do is ask McNally where he got the ball, and almost certainly the official that had to find the ball would have told Kensil what he discovered. At that point the investigation into the Patriots ball pressure is ludicrous. He should have been busy tracking down what Miller was doing. The Patriots are a red herring, and nothing points to them at all. So we have to believe nobody told him this, they only told him enough to get him out of the booth, then just were silent as he started investigating Patriot balls despite knowing the incident didn't involve the Patriots. It seems unlikely.

3. The leaks only lead one way. You would expect if the leaks were just information about the investigation coming out in bits they would have included the most important issue, they would leak bits of all the investigation. But the part that is an actual crime, the genesis of the whole thing, the parts that led to someone getting fired- somehow never get leaked. So whoever is leaking the information seems to want to leak info that makes the Patriots look bad, but not the league. They're not leaking the investigation, they're leaking a certain narrative.

They say don't attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity, but I think it's a stretch to say Kensil is so stupid he wouldn't even ask the guy he was called about a question and pursue that angle. Where did you get that ball? Miller. Then ask Miller where he got it. Took it for charity. Why did you take it and replace it with an unapproved ball...etc. you can see how this would progress, and at no point does it rationally lead to the Patriots. Plus with Kensil, malice may be a better explanation than stupidity. Really, the most logical reason would be that he knew about the ball stealing and wanted to steer the investigation away.

IMO if they're going to leak a certain narrative to make the Pats look bad and cover the league, it's not far fetched to say they could have steered the investigation itself to make the Pats look bad and cover the league. Especially when considering their original justification for measuring Patriot balls makes little sense. In fact it's one of several changing reasons they've given us, Jackson felt the ball, then the equip manager, now Grigson. Makes me thing they don't want to tell us the real reason.
 
Whoa.

K-ball.
cabal.

Holy crap! It IS a conspiracy! (And Madonna has been studying how to throw with a K-ball, making her a K-balla.)
 
1/25
Sharks of Vegas‏@SharksOfVegas
Mike Kensil, remember that name guys.......

1/25
Sharks of Vegas‏@SharksOfVegas
BREAKING -Source CONFIRMS NFL Investigation is more about the officials than the Patriots.

Today:
Sharks of Vegas ‏@SharksOfVegas 15m15 minutes ago
Unless he can find a scapegoat, Mike Kensil is going to get fired guys.

I believe SoV also stated that their sources were telling them that the NFL had nothing on the Patriots, that there would be no sanctions and that there would be a quick (within a couple days) resolution. The last part obviously didn't happen but I don't ding them or their sources for how something this political has played out.

Interesting that this Sharks of Vegas guy seems to have a pretty good inside track feel for beating the point spread

Seeing how Goodell seems to get bent out of shape every time Belichick tries to hide player injuries from other teams (as well as the Las Vegas oddsmakers) I guess I wouldn't be shocked if someone with gambling ties had a direct line of communication inside the NFL offices. That would explain a lot

The other thing I'm not sure too many media members picked up on is the fact that the Patriots were the ones who raised the issue of game ball integrity with the Kicking balls after noting the NFL was playing with a non-prepped ball

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...alerted-nfl-to-issue-with-special-teams-ball/

Does it strike anyone else as implausible that, at a time the team was allegedly actively engaged in an effort to violate game ball integrity, the Patriots would go out of their way to have the officials focus on.... wait for it

Game ball integrity?
 
Last edited:
There's a few reasons why I don't buy this.

1. Blandino says the officials knew nothing about it. Maybe he lied, but they also acted like they knew nothing about it. Didn't log pressure, didn't watch the ball boy, etc.

2. It's not how normal people act. We have an official who found the missing ball and handed it to McNally, we have McNally, and we have Miller. All three (at least) have information on why McNally has the ball. But Kensil doesn't ask them? Even if it's true the official called Kensil over McNally merely handing him a ball (which seems unlikely) the very first thing anyone would do is ask McNally where he got the ball, and almost certainly the official that had to find the ball would have told Kensil what he discovered. At that point the investigation into the Patriots ball pressure is ludicrous. He should have been busy tracking down what Miller was doing. The Patriots are a red herring, and nothing points to them at all. So we have to believe nobody told him this, they only told him enough to get him out of the booth, then just were silent as he started investigating Patriot balls despite knowing the incident didn't involve the Patriots. It seems unlikely.

3. The leaks only lead one way. You would expect if the leaks were just information about the investigation coming out in bits they would have included the most important issue, they would leak bits of all the investigation. But the part that is an actual crime, the genesis of the whole thing, the parts that led to someone getting fired- somehow never get leaked. So whoever is leaking the information seems to want to leak info that makes the Patriots look bad, but not the league. They're not leaking the investigation, they're leaking a certain narrative.

They say don't attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity, but I think it's a stretch to say Kensil is so stupid he wouldn't even ask the guy he was called about a question and pursue that angle. Where did you get that ball? Miller. Then ask Miller where he got it. Took it for charity. Why did you take it and replace it with an unapproved ball...etc. you can see how this would progress, and at no point does it rationally lead to the Patriots. Plus with Kensil, malice may be a better explanation than stupidity. Really, the most logical reason would be that he knew about the ball stealing and wanted to steer the investigation away.

IMO if they're going to leak a certain narrative to make the Pats look bad and cover the league, it's not far fetched to say they could have steered the investigation itself to make the Pats look bad and cover the league. Especially when considering their original justification for measuring Patriot balls makes little sense. In fact it's one of several changing reasons they've given us, Jackson felt the ball, then the equip manager, now Grigson. Makes me thing they don't want to tell us the real reason.

All great points.

Assuming the "facts" of the Wells report are consistent with what we now know, it will be clear that a source or sources in the NFL office were selectively leaking and spinning information to make the Patriots look bad

That strongly implicates Kensil IMO - though I worry because this guy is now a wounded animal fighting for his job and credibility. He NEEDS the NFL to find something on the Patriots and this latest effort to throw McNally under the bus is a good example

But Kraft clearly has had enough and my guess is he authorized his own "leak" of information, setting the record straight about McNally before the news cycle of the day had even finished.

As you point out, the fact that someone in the NFL office would go out of their way to leak info to purposefully (and inaccurately) make the Patriots look bad, makes the notion of a full conspiracy theory intended to frame the Patriots completely at least plausible (though the fact that they bungled the sting so badly should have anyone question that conspiracy theory)
 
I don't buy that Goodell will be able to do anything nefarious with the Wells report. Bob Kraft is going to see it and no way he allows his team to look bad. Don't forget Goodie works for Kraft not the other way around.
 
Ken brought up a very interesting point upthread regarding Kensil re-inflating the balls at halftime.

By doing so, it makes it impossible to determine whether or not pressure do to environmental factors,as Belichick alluded to in his presser.

Of course, the psi numbers were not recorded before the game balls were given to the Patriots ball attendant AFAIK, but that is beside the point.

However, the action Kensil took makes it look much worse for the Patriots, similar to what Goodell did during CameraPlacementGate by destroying the tapes.

Such actions seemingly make the accused look more guilty, because a majority of the public suspects that the situation must have been really bad for such severe actions to be undertaken (i.e. destroying tapes and re-inflating game balls).
 
Last edited:
It still bothers me that Kensil put air into a ball and nobody informed the Patriots until Monday morning. From Brady's press conference and all the current and ex-QB's that talked about this issue, one things seemed clear and that is that the QB likes their ball a certain way and they do not want them messed with after they are approved. So for someone to alter the game balls and not inform the Patriots during the freakin' AFCCG is mind blowing and put the Patriots at a disadvantage. Also, what pressure did they fill them to? I wonder if they were at the upper end of the legal spectrum (13.5), especially since it had been reported that Brady likes his balls at 12.5. I mean, if you are gonna mess with the balls you might as well do it "right". I think the Patriots should go on the offensive on this issue, they have a real complaint if these reports are true.
 
It still bothers me that Kensil put air into a ball and nobody informed the Patriots until Monday morning. From Brady's press conference and all the current and ex-QB's that talked about this issue, one things seemed clear and that is that the QB likes their ball a certain way and they do not want them messed with after they are approved. So for someone to alter the game balls and not inform the Patriots during the freakin' AFCCG is mind blowing and put the Patriots at a disadvantage. Also, what pressure did they fill them to? I wonder if they were at the upper end of the legal spectrum (13.5), especially since it had been reported that Brady likes his balls at 12.5. I mean, if you are gonna mess with the balls you might as well do it "right". I think the Patriots should go on the offensive on this issue, they have a real complaint if these reports are true.

You're 100% correct to bring this up. As a DIRECT RESULT of their re-inflating the balls at half time (for the first time in NFL history), they forced the Patriots to play the second half with balls that were ILLEGALLY OVER-INFLATED.

I am going to assume that they inflated the balls at half time to the league nominal of 13.0 psig. If this assumption is true, the pressurization of the balls was EQUIVALENT TO balls that had been inflated to 14.3 psi at 75°F.

Well over Brady's preferred 12.5 psig.
Well over the league nominal of 13.0 psig.
And well over the league maximum of 13.5 psig.

[Note: If they reinflated them to TB's choice of 12.5 psig, then they were still "illegally over-inflated", but by a lesser amount: equivalent to 13.8 psig at 75°F.]

How does this happen? Because you can make no statement about a ball's inflation state without knowing the temperature of the air inside the ball.!

Here's the calculation:

The reason that they were overinflated is that most (~93%) of the air inside the football was at about 50F. The pressure inside a Tom Brady's "legally inflated" football (12.5 psig @ 75°F), when the air inside is 50°F MUST BE around 11.2 psi.

We will ignore heating of the introduced air from adiabatic compression in the pump.

The pressure & temperature state of the internal air prior to repressurization was: {11.2 psig @ 50°F}
A very close approximation for the final internal air temp can be estimated by simply “proportioning by pressure" the amount of air in the ball at each temperature.

The final ball pressure will be 13.0 psig = 27.7 psia
The pressure of the air at 50°F = 11.2 psig = 25.7 psia
The percent of air at 50°F in the re-inflated ball will be 25.7 psia/27.7 psia = 93%
The percent of air at 75°F in the re-inflated ball will be 100% - 93% = 7%
The final temp of the re-inflated ball will be very close to .93*(50+460) + 0.07*(75+460) = 511.7°R = 51.7°F.

By our previous calculations, the EQUIVALENT ROOM TEMP PRESSURIZATION of this ball was:

P1 = P2 * (T1/T2) = (13.0+14.7) psia * (75+460)°R / (51.7+460)°R = 29.0 psia = 14.3 psig @ 75°F.

The Pats played with a ball that was EQUIVALENT TO one that had been pressurized & checked in the locker room before the game to an equivalent of 14.3 psig.

And Brady had no trouble throwing this "over inflated" ball. And the receivers had no trouble catching this "over inflated" ball. And the Pats out-scored the Colts 28-0 in the second half.

While they only outscored them 17-7 in the first half, with their "low pressure, but legal" (12.5 psi @ 75°F) footballs.

So much for the "underinflated balls give the passer, receivers & runners an advantage" nonsense.
 


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top