You lost me when you claim that Dennard isn't a starting caliber CB.
Do you even read these posts before you disagree with them? I never said that. I said that in 2013 he was a low-to-mid tier starter, and that he may still be that but it's a pretty big question mark at this point considering that he couldn't crack the top 5 in the CB rotation.
So Dennard isn't starting caliber CB when he started for the Patriots for two years? I would classify a starting caliber CB as a player who has shown that he can be a starter over a long stretch of time. Just because he fell down the depth chart this year does not change that.
It certainly calls it into question. If he was a starter-caliber player this year, then he would have cracked the active roster this year. For whatever reason, he clearly wasn't starter-caliber in a year where he couldn't break into a 5-man CB rotation, and the fact that this is even being debated is kinda absurd.
He was hindered by injuries this year and missed the entire offseason and part of the regular season was put in a role he isn't suited for this season (nickel). He lost his starting job to an even better #2 CB (at least for what the Pats wanted to do).
He didn't just lose his starting job, or the starting nickel job that Arrington had. I expected going into the season that he would be CB4, and that's not a bad thing. It was just a reflection of how much better the Pats had become at CB. But he also lost the #4 and #5 jobs, because, despite being a press corner, and despite the Pats needing depth with exactly that type of player, they still elected to go with a poor scheme fit in Ryan and an UDFA in Butler over him.
This time last year, the Pats might have been able to get a 3rd for him, maybe a low second. He was an up and coming CB with some good press man skills and was a solid #2 CB. This year, he lost his job due to injuries, a change in philosophy, and a new starter who fit what they wanted better.
This time last year, there is no way in hell that Dennard would have fetched a 2nd. And he did not lose his job because of a change in philosophy. There was no change in philosophy. You yourself just said that press man coverage is what he does best. Well what do you think they signed Revis and Browner to do? Depth is needed behind those guys, because Ryan and Arrington most certainly are not press man corners. The fact that he couldn't stick on the roster as the first man off the bench on the outside is pretty telling, and 'a change in philosophy' is a justification that you're inventing after the fact that's simply not true.
Dennard's upside is one of the top #2 CB in the league (not the top, but maybe top 5). May never make it, but he was on his way before his shoulder surgery hindered his progression. If you don't see that, yes you are undervaluing him.
So where would that put him in terms of overall CBs? Somewhere between 30 and 40? I disagree, but not by a huge amount. I'd put him somewhere in the 40-60 range, somewhere between 'league-average starter' and 'moderately below league-average starter'. Which again, isn't a bad thing. Starting a guy like that isn't a bad thing, and having him as depth is a downright advantage.
But even if we're talking a guy whose ceiling is that best case scenario he's around the 40th best corner in the league, nobody in the NFL is trading a mid-round pick for a
one year of a guy who
might be the 35th best corner is everything breaks right and there isn't something more to him being benched for a year. You're just experiencing a fundamental failure in understanding the value of draft picks.
The guy is young and has a lot skills. He has black marks, but he is certainly worth a 5th, may be a 4th. Last year people would be upset if they traded him away for less than a 2nd rounder. I think the disappointing season knocks him down a few rounds. But the guy has a lot of upside that is worth risking a lower midround pick.
Take everything that you just said and apply it to Akeem Ayers, yet again. Akeem Ayers is the same age as Dennard, established himself in his second year as a pass rusher of potential starter caliber. Hurt his knee, had surgery. New coach came in, established a new defensive scheme (unlike what you're claiming with Dennard, Ayers actually
was the victim of a scheme change), and Ayers was promptly buried on the bench. Week in and week out, he was a gameday inactive, But since he was a young, talented player who had demonstrated starter-level ability and enough talent to be a 2nd round pick, surely someone would give up a mid-round pick for him, right?
No, as it turns out. He ended up being a pick swap that's going to net the Titans a move-up of maybe 10-15 spots at the top of the 6th round. That move-up ends up being worth less than a 7th round pick. So, if you're going to reply to this at all, I want you to articulate exactly why Dennard would be worth exponentially more right now than Ayers was worth last year or LeGarrette Blount was worth 2 years ago.
Yet again, this straw man that you've constructed just isn't going to work. Nobody's claiming that Dennard sucks, or that he doesn't have potential, or that we don't remember what he was able to do in 2012-13. The one and only claim that I'm making is that he isn't worth more than LeGarrette Blount and Akeem Ayers. And if you're going to respond, I'm going to demand that you start by articulating exactly why you think he's worth
way, way more (multiple times more) than they were.