patsfan06
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2011
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 218
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So I am a reff who will steal a $100 ball during the AFC championship game which was supposed to go to charity but I can be trusted not to take a $100k bribe to fix a game? NFL has big problems and this should be the story now. (I know I am dreaming)
Indeed. IDK about NFL Network (they obviously have a couple bitter ex-players) but NFL.com has been decent to us, which is more than be said for most sites.The only really thing from NFL.com since this thing started has been Rapoport's report that only 1 ball was 2 PSI under the rest were just a few ticks under.
Boy, you think those smart reporters would have figured this out...
BTW, folks - - here is the video of Schefter breaking into the OTL show to drop his bomb!
ESPN seems to be ignoring it, and will probably do a Pravda and whitewash what Schefter broke.
Here for eternity (until ESPN washes the internet) is the video. My guess is that Mr. Schefter is not popular with ESPN's management right now:
http://deadspin.com/whats-up-with-this-adam-schefter-ballghazi-report-1686622313
I hope Jim McNally has some good lawyers. Cause he is in line for a nice payday from ESPN.
Mike has been good. He reacted a bit quickly to the original story but still maintained the word "IF" but otherwise he has come around quickly and realized how ridiculous this crap isAttaboy, Mike!
Mike Reiss ✔ @MikeReiss
On @ESPNBoston, latest story with new @AdamSchefter information on K balls, NFL official & locker room attendant. http://es.pn/1DDrWOq
Second, by not clearing McNally's name.
Mike has been good. He reacted a bit quickly to the original story but still maintained the word "IF" but otherwise he has come around quickly and realized how ridiculous this crap is
I'm guessing Roger has a couple bucks stashed in a piggy bank somewhere.Probably at the same 1 star restaurant that Goodell will be working at in a few months.
People make mistakes. I'm not going to chastise Mike over it. He is one of the good guys as I see it.Especially since one of the worst pieces of incorrect reporting was by his colleague Mort, and he initially obligated to accept it as accurate.
I'm sure he didn't steal the charity ball. 1 of 1 will be noticed. He stole another ball meant for the game since nobody cares what happens to them after the game. Still corrupt obviously.That's what I said! Why isn't this being picked up as the biggest issue to come out of this?
Reiss et al. are clearing McNally's name.
The media never get into trouble if the "only" things wrong in what they do are:
- Honest errors.
- Failure to give corrections the same visibility as the original errors.
I am HAMMERING Kravitz on twitter
Why would that discussion come from this, when it wasn't any of the refs that did this? I just think people are confused with the word "official" here when it's just an official NFL employee. Not "official" as in ref.That's what I said! Why isn't this being picked up as the biggest issue to come out of this?
I don't see why. They reported the truth.
No matter how much the league resists Kraft's demand for an apology, we can be confident McNally will be exonerated clearly and by name in the report, just as ESPN is exonerating him now. When it's all over, Kraft should send him a nice "Sorry you had to go through this" bonus check, but that's about the extent of it.
It wasn't a ref. Just an employee that, from all info we've gotten, would have absolutely no way to fix a game.Tweet it away. I am. "a reff who steals a $100 ball from charity during a champ game can be trusted not to take a $100k bribe to fix a game?"
There is a considerable difference between an honest error and repetitive slander.Reiss et al. are clearing McNally's name.
The media never get into trouble if the "only" things wrong in what they do are:
- Honest errors.
- Failure to give corrections the same visibility as the original errors.