Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
It both is and isn't stupid.
It isn't because one can imagine signing Maxwell rather than Revis and then using the money saved elsewhere.
It is because the "be able" phasing sounded as if Revis and McCourty can't both be kept, when in fact the base case is that the both stay.
It also is because if Revis walks no other CB will necessarily be signed at all; we do have 5 other CBs under contract, and McCourty is CB depth as well.
It isn't because one can imagine signing Maxwell rather than Revis and then using the money saved elsewhere.
It is because the "be able" phasing sounded as if Revis and McCourty can't both be kept, when in fact the base case is that the both stay.
It also is because if Revis walks no other CB will necessarily be signed at all; we do have 5 other CBs under contract, and McCourty is CB depth as well.