- Joined
- Jan 4, 2005
- Messages
- 33,837
- Reaction score
- 5,674
IMO King did a good job taking the interviews and creating a narrative about the great 4th qtr of Brady.
With respect to deflategate, He was IMO fair to the Pats (after being horrible on spygate. He was emailed about the Head Smart experiment, then when he was emailed by Palm Beach Pats Fan he called him and acknowledged that the forensic part of the investigation would be key. So he moved from assuming the PAts were guilty, to a position that Science could account for the pressure differential observed.
That is significant IMO and much more than most of the mediots would do, ie they failed to acknowledge the science after the story got out.
http://mmqb.si.com/2015/01/27/nfl-deflategate-investigation-patriots/
With respect to deflategate, He was IMO fair to the Pats (after being horrible on spygate. He was emailed about the Head Smart experiment, then when he was emailed by Palm Beach Pats Fan he called him and acknowledged that the forensic part of the investigation would be key. So he moved from assuming the PAts were guilty, to a position that Science could account for the pressure differential observed.
That is significant IMO and much more than most of the mediots would do, ie they failed to acknowledge the science after the story got out.
http://mmqb.si.com/2015/01/27/nfl-deflategate-investigation-patriots/