- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
There have been a few comments about Welker being more prone to drops. I would like to see one of them post the numbers on dropped passes percentages for Jules and Welker. If those posters believe Welker had the dropsies, that exercise might prove enlightening. Otherwise, it is true that fiction can be fun.
It is bewildering how much scorn a key player for the Pats earns when he is not on the Pats. Belichick wisely played the "use and lose" game in letting him go when he did, but the Pats of 2007 to 2012 would not be the Pats without Welker. The deluded souls believing the team would have an extra ring or so forget how much bang the Pats got for the buck with Welker, and how frequently he was the one catching the ball and moving the chains. The notion that any slot receiver looks like that with Brady is fairly naive and ridiculous.
I remember "Moss made Welker", and then Welker excelled without Moss.
I remember "The TEs and Welker will get in each other's way", and then 2011 saw 122.90 and 79 catches
I then remember "Welker can't do it without Brady" and Welker then getting 73 catches in just 13 games in Denver (2013).
Welker was legit. He got open faster than anyone in the NFL. Hell, even last year's "down" year saw him get 49 catches on 64 targets, despite his missing more games, getting less PT, and clearly not getting back to 100% after Manning hung him out to dry yet again.