NFL Network unwatchable

Just turned on to see what they are talking about..First thing I hear is Marshall Faulk saying Brady is having negative thoughts heading into this game because he lost the last 2. I didn't realize he was a mind reader. Then Sapp chimes in that if the Pats lose, it all goes back to Spygate. Jeez.. Irvin did say if Pats win, Brady the best QB ever...reasoning was because how far he has come being only a 6th ropund pick. That doesn't make sense to me....but at least a positive lol

I generally agree with what Deion says, but the whole "Montana going 4-4 is better than if Tom goes 4-6" argument is so stupid. So it would be better if Tom had lost two of those AFC championships? That makes zero sense. Of course, Deion is probably a little biased.

Irvin always got our back.

Faulk is a crybaby loser that holds grudges over a GAME.

Sapp is a 300 lb mouth breather with an IQ of 65. After all his years playing, he is bankrupt and won't pay child support. Guy is a loser too.

Ned Stark said:

I generally agree with what Deion says, but the whole "Montana going 4-4 is better than if Tom goes 4-6" argument is so stupid. So it would be better if Tom had lost two of those AFC championships? That makes zero sense. Of course, Deion is probably a little biased.

Click to expand...

Ya I don't get the "Brady would have been better off not making the SB" talk. But then again these guys need anything they can get to knock him

Brady has also taken 4 different Pats team to the SB. (01-04, 07, 11, and 14). Montana did it with practically the same team.

I've been watching it this morning and it's funny as hell. It's like a bunch of ex-Rams sitting around thinking if they talk about the Pats losing enough, it'll somehow affect the game outcome.

Ned Stark said:

I generally agree with what Deion says, but the whole "Montana going 4-4 is better than if Tom goes 4-6" argument is so stupid. So it would be better if Tom had lost two of those AFC championships? That makes zero sense. Of course, Deion is probably a little biased.

Click to expand...

Because it doesn't make sense. I'd rather be to 6 and win 4 than only go to 4. It's certainly more impressive. Montana was good, but if Brady ha his running ability to go with his current arm, guy has more than 6 rings IMO.

these guys just hate the patriots sooo much. I was watching some of dilfer/ray lewis. and they pretty much were saying the patriots will be lucky to move the ball at all and seahawks will shut down gronkowski...using last years denver game as a basis...

My advice to you is: Start drinking heavily and STOP watching the pre-game crap. It'll be "all hate, all the time" on every network.

PATS16N0 said:

I've been watching it this morning and it's funny as hell. It's like a bunch of ex-Rams sitting around thinking if they talk about the Pats losing enough, it'll somehow affect the game outcome.

Click to expand...

Faulk's bitterness is remarkable.

Sapp is a fat jerk.

They all seem to dismiss when Irvin says anything positive about patriots. It's sickening. But let me tell you I made the mistake of turning from that to espn and just as bad, Chris Carter even calling brady a liar again. I want to watch pregame but where will nbc be any better?

This is all you need to know about that garbage network and the people they PAY to have [****ty] opinions:

Do all these "analysts" forget that the "vaunted" Seattle secondary is very banged up?

Instead of hearing how Brady can pick apart a wounded animal, we're hearing how we'll be lucky to even move the ball a yard.

Lol I can't even contain my laughter...

Espn is no better. Listening to Chris Carter talking about deflategate reduced my iq by 20 points.

I am watching CBS (WBZ). I get the east coast feeds here from Boston. At least I can watch Zolok et all.

I wish the gauging Brady to Montana talk would just stop. Different era,different rules,bigger and stronger athletes today. Tough argument with no time machine to prove anything.

It's an impossible argument and you win or lose. This talk shouldn't really happen until Brady retires and his accomplishments truly kick in. Most players legacies grow after they leave the game. Right now he is a legend still playing and some despise him for that. Don't know what you got till it's gone applies here. The haters probably will come around after he's been gone a little bit and realize the greatness that was Tom Brady.

RIpats88 said:

these guys just hate the patriots sooo much. I was watching some of dilfer/ray lewis. and they pretty much were saying the patriots will be lucky to move the ball at all and seahawks will shut down gronkowski...using last years denver game as a basis...

Click to expand...

I have not watched ESPN since the AFCCG

Oh the other thing I've heard over and over is Seattle has the edge in QB. Truely don't get this one. ..I mean I know he's got the mobility and no disrespect to him but it's like these analysts were picking across the board like this. ...none of them believe tom brady could be a difference maker??

TBR said:

This is all you need to know about that garbage network and the people they PAY to have [****ty] opinions:

Click to expand...

Not saying I agree with them but context is important. Were they asking which QB is the better QB or which one has the edge because they got more help with defense/running game etc.

A few weeks ago we got notice that our Directv contract was up. After reviewing our program choice my Bride asked me if I still wanted to keep the NFLN package and I figured WTF, the regular season was over and I can get by without it. Best choice I've recently made. Not only did I lose the NFLN, I lost ESPN as well and never got to watch all the crap since the Ravens game.

Go Freaken Patriots!