One thing that is missing I believe is that BB pointed out that their conditioning of footballs on average (and he said many footballs in the simulations) increased PSI by 1 pound. Differences between the "controlled environment" where the Pats filled the footballs and field conditions would have accounted for another 1 to 1.5 PSI (as we can easily demonstrate given the difference between 70 degrees and 45 to 50 degrees on the field). I think BB was saying that you take the 1 to 1.5 PSI loss from controlled environment to field conditions, add the 1 that artificially increases PSI due to conditioning (which should also dissipate over time), and you get to 2-2.5 PSI loss without ever circumventing the official NFL rules.
The Colts balls may have been colder to begin with (after all they were the visiting team arriving earlier that same day, and who knows where their footballs were stored the very cold night before), and maybe Luck likes his balls hard to begin with, giving the Colts' footballs greater range to deflate. So this "Colts footballs" issue is really a non-issue. The fact that BB came out with such force, really like we've never seen him before, tells me all I need to know.
Harbaaaaaaawwwwwwwww and his buddy Chucky P. concocted this nonsense. I can't wait to see all the hater apologists backtrack next week. Whereas we all suffered mightily as diehard fans last week because we had to deal with the Fellategate nonsense, the coming week will be all the sweeter. And our team will come out on Super Bowl Sunday like Patton's Third Army!!! GO PATS!!!!!
