Todd Bradley
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2014
- Messages
- 3,721
- Reaction score
- 6,263
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Before I reply to your comment, from which angle are you coming? Don't want to inadvertently start debating a point we're actually agreeing on
Lol, just IMAGINE if they suspended Brady for the SB.
People trying to blame this on the NFL, or the Colts, or aliens, for example.
Lol, just IMAGINE if they suspended Brady for the SB.
Lol, just IMAGINE if they suspended Brady for the SB.
Which would not be violating anything. The rule says what pressure the balls must be at when the referee inspects, and that they cannot be tampered with after.If the Pats did mess with it, the most likely method that I have seen posed would be filling the balls with hot air just prior to the refs testing it. By game time, the PSI would drop a predictable amount.
I want to know what the NFL is going to do about the Patriots being forced to play the first half with an inferior football that didn't meet specifications. We have have scored 60 if they didn't give us a bad football.
I wouldn't watch it.
In fact I doubt I would ever watch football again. Simply not worth it.
If the NFL is so concerned with the "integrity" of the game why do they allow a set of balls for the home team, another set for the away team and another set for the kicking game? Why not 50 balls supplied by the league set to the NFL's standards?
It almost seems as though they were allowing teams to "bend" the rules to suit each QB.
I hope so but I thought the same thing with Spygate and it still lives on after 7 years.You're overreacting in five years we are going to laugh at how silly this is.
Yeah, it almost seems as if the league thinks "Don't screw with the balls after you get them back" is supposed to mean "don't screw with the balls after you get them back". Crazy, huh?
Please explain the concept that cheating is perpetuated in the Patriots organization.
They were penalized for breaking a rule by conducting acceptable taping, but from an incorrect location, and had a reasonable defense where the rule specifically stated it applied if you were using the film in that game, which they did not.
Balls were under inflated and no one yet knows if the Patriots had anything to do with that.
What else you got?
Lol, just IMAGINE if they suspended Brady for the SB.
I read his WEEI interview. Downright disgusting that these guys get airtime and are columnists. Says BB should thrown out for good and Packers should go to the SB instead of the pats who 'rigged' the game.
How long before Billy Cundiff claims that a deflated ball was the reason he missed that kick?
In that case they can always show last year's super bowl again...If that happened and I was the Pats I would wait to the last minute and forfeit the game so there would be no SB and the NFL would lose millions from companies looking for a refund on their ad money.