- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 15,522
- Reaction score
- 27,522
I have a lot of mixed emotions about Ayers. A lot is being colored by the presence of both Moore and Buchanon on the horizen. Both have very similar skill sets as Ayers. Both are very raw, and of course Buchanon in on the IR.Though we don't know the details yet, Marcus Cannon's 2 year/$9M contract with a $3.2M signing bonus could be a useful guide to an Ayers deal. Cannon is not a starter, but he's someone who BB seems to think is a valuable rotational player who deserves playing time:
http://www.patriots.com/news/blog/a...-to-play/164c6c65-fd7e-4499-b204-debbe5a6541a
I think Ayers falls into roughly the same class: a valuable rotational player who has been productive and helped the team, and who deserves to play. He's played much better than Cannon this year, though he has a smaller body of work. If the Pats value Cannon enough to give him a 2 year deal at $4.5M per maximum value, I don't see why a 4/$16 is out of Ayers' range. Like swing tackles, rotational pass rushers are valued in the NFL.
I think whether the Pats extend themselves to sign Ayers long term will depend a LOT on how the Pats end up evaluating Moore and Buchanon's potential and future with the team. Both have the potential to be as good if not better than Ayers and both will cost a hell of a lot less. The question is between going with the "known" vs "the potential" and the relative cost of both.
That being said, Ayers ought to be paying the Pats for resurrecting his playing career. One way or the other his stay here is going to make him a lot of money and insure his employment in the league for several years to come. If the decision comes down to keep, I'd still only do it one a 2 year basis. Or one of those phony baloney 4 year deals that really only commit the team to 2 years before they can drop the player. Either way 3-4MM/yr is likely to be the price for a proven rotational pass rusher