BlueThunder
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2019 Weekly Picks Winner
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 5,600
- Reaction score
- 2,797
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Fair point i'll give you that, but what happened to you scratch my back and i'll scratch yours? Doesn't mean that just because we have a great secondary now that their has to be an anaemic pass rush does it? They need to work in tandem and not let the other do everything. Hoping Chandler comes back and changes all that but putting chips on one man is dangerous is it not?We can actually cover now. The 2010-2013 Secondaries would've given up 500 passing yards and 45 points in this game
They couldn't touch Eli in 2007 or 2011 and that will be the case if they make it in 2014. Even if Chandler comes back 100% is it enough to get over the hump? How many more years is there going to be a sub par pass rush at key times?
It's all well and good getting to crap QB's like Geno and EJ Manuel but our pass rush doesn't work against the ones with pocket presence, mobility and awareness.
When it mattered most Brady needed just a bit more time (just like in the 2 SB losses) but they got to him and when we needed to get to Rodgers on that completion to Cobb, surprise, surprise we COULDN'T.
That pressure Seattle put on Peyton was LETHAL and it is pretty much how you beat an elite QB in a SB and that's what the Pats should be aiming for.
@MAYOnnaise--get a sense of humor, read the entire post...or even better---both.
You're one of a few select people who rides that "dislike" button like it's your current girlfriend.
Pretty sure the Pats had 3 sacks today to 1 for GB, Negative Nellie.
They couldn't touch Eli in 2007 or 2011 and that will be the case if they make it in 2014. Even if Chandler comes back 100% is it enough to get over the hump? How many more years is there going to be a sub par pass rush at key times?
It's all well and good getting to crap QB's like Geno and EJ Manuel but our pass rush doesn't work against the ones with pocket presence, mobility and awareness.
When it mattered most Brady needed just a bit more time (just like in the 2 SB losses) but they got to him and when we needed to get to Rodgers on that completion to Cobb, surprise, surprise we COULDN'T.
That pressure Seattle put on Peyton was LETHAL and it is pretty much how you beat an elite QB in a SB and that's what the Pats should be aiming for.
Like i say, all sacks when they don't count that much just like in the SB's where they can't get to the crap Manning from completing long bombs.
The sack that mattered the most is the one GB got on Brady at the end, the one we couldn't get was the one we needed for the ball back to possibly win it
A 5 point loss to a very good team, who seemed to get most of the breaks, at their place and we have no hope?
Like I said in another thread, BB didn't want to show GB all the cards we have. We can afford to lose this game. If we meet GB again in SB, GB has little chance to win.Pats are a better team.
The play calling was horrendous. Brady made some piss poor decisions.
Why go for the td with 3.50 left in the game on 2nd and 9.
They couldn't touch Eli in 2007 or 2011 and that will be the case if they make it in 2014. Even if Chandler comes back 100% is it enough to get over the hump? How many more years is there going to be a sub par pass rush at key times?
It's all well and good getting to crap QB's like Geno and EJ Manuel but our pass rush doesn't work against the ones with pocket presence, mobility and awareness.
When it mattered most Brady needed just a bit more time (just like in the 2 SB losses) but they got to him and when we needed to get to Rodgers on that completion to Cobb, surprise, surprise we COULDN'T.
That pressure Seattle put on Peyton was LETHAL and it is pretty much how you beat an elite QB in a SB and that's what the Pats should be aiming for.
Like I said in another thread, BB didn't want to show GB all the cards we have. We can afford to lose this game. If we meet GB again in SB, GB has little chance to win.
Ware looks like his old self again