PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Blount Signs with Pats (2yr deal)


Status
Not open for further replies.
It's easy to see why you'd be mystified. You can't understand the simple concept that the Patriots signed Blount at the earliest possible moment they could and that it would have no affect on the Lions defensive game plan. You also don't seem to understand that the Lions wouldn't be game-planning for the #3 RB on the opposing team.

As for you thinking I'm a troll, there are a few problems with that. First and foremost, trolls don't use facts to blow up a person's argument. Second, Trolls immediately get self-righteous when they are challenged and claim that the other person didn't understand them.. Kinda like you did. All I've done is use facts to show how your posts didn't make any sense. You clearly got offended that anyone, let alone me, should 2nd guess your "pie in the sky" theory.

BTW, do you understand what "pie in the sky" means? It means far-fetched. Unlikely. So, why you'd be getting all worked up over someone pointing out how the facts don't support it speaks volumes about you.

As for banning. That's easy. I've not done anything that would deserve being banned.

Haley, you are just another in a long line of people who can't admit when they've made a mistake.

Dude, I don't know if you do this on purpose or you just come off this way unitentionally, but almost every post of yours I read sounds like you are telling the poster you are responding to that they are a stupid ***hole. If you mean to be doing it, I'm sorry for you. If you don't, take some friendly advice and recognize that this is the persona you give off.
Other posters can feel free to comment on my perception as well.
 
blount.gif

i hate that stupid dance.
 
This signing reeks of running the football against the Broncos in the playoffs. Something I was begging for last year.
 
He may have quit on his teammate in Pitt but even while he was there he was the biggest Patriots' cheerleader on twitter all season long.

He reminded me a lot of Randy Moss returning to NE as a Viking, his post game presser where he basically said "I regret everything that led to my trade to this **** hole."

Blount never left NE in his mind it looks like and I don't see him quitting here.

Hope I'm right and that he can still break off those stupidly improbably long runs he made a habit of doing towards the end of last season.

I do like the idea of Gray/Blount rotating drives unless one gets on a very hot streak like Gray did in Indy. In that scenario, keep him in until he gets tired. But having two "big backs" you can rotate on a series by series basis, who both bring similar skills, the defense will always know they aren't going deep, it keeps both sets of legs very fresh and the defense very unwilling to tackle a pair of 230-250lb backs who never have a chance to get tired.
 
Blount hasn't been setting the world on fire this season (mainly in the recent games). He could be the oddman out once Siliga returns to the 53. Who knows? We'll see what he can do in the next few weeks.

It would be amazing if we lose our starting RB to IR during the season, and then improve our RB situation. We can judge at week 17. Does the fact that no one claimed him tell us something?

All it says is that no one wanted to assume a $3.5 million dollar existing deal. I think there were teams who would interview him without that contract. BB knows him, and didn't waste any time.

Amazing Team improvement for little money or future Draft picks, in Ayers, Casillas, Branch, and Blount. That amounts to what most teams would consider the results of an entire annual Draft.
 
Can you please provide examples?

Kliff Kingsbury told a local paper that he was informed of his injury by Belichick.
 
Such a no-brainer IMO. We otherwise had no backup at the "power" running back spot, which has been a big part of the offensive gameplan in 2/10 games this season. (Sure ain't Bolden.) Getting a guy, who was a 5-yard-per-carry-dude in our system, for peanuts.

Plus, I had read an opinion -- I wouldn't pretend to know if it's true, but it sounds plausible -- that, in any event, there isn't nearly enough time left in the season to assimilate a completely new offensive system. Makes it a buyer's market for the Pats (as if it wasn't already).
 
Jeff Demps had a legitimate knee injury. The Pats IRed him. Using PFT as your source when everyone knows that Florio and his band of nitwits have an axe to grind with the Pats doesn't help your case.

Furthermore, if you don't think that the Commissioner looked into it to make sure that the Pats weren't doing something underhanded, then I have some cheap oceanfront property in New Mexico to sell you.

I wasn't looking for any help with my case.

I think you are going overboard with the PFT vs NEP angle. They report the same stuff others do.

The MRI was negative. No investigation was done.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...cious-but-dont-count-on-anything-happening/Ok how about different sources.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap10...-place-olympian-jeff-demps-on-injured-reserve
 

Posting PFT does absolutely nothing to support your contention. That is a known rag who has admitted to stirring stuff up - particularly about the Patriots - in an effort to generate clicks.

"Fine" in NFL talk typically means only a month of missed time (see both Mayo in 2010 and Chung in 2011 for recent examples of this) when discussing knee issues. Demps quite clearly injured his knee, the only real debate is the severity, which is something I already offered. Players are almost always hurt when the go in IR, it is just that they aren't always truly season ending injuries.
 
Posting PFT does absolutely nothing to support your contention. That is a known rag who has admitted to stirring stuff up - particularly about the Patriots - in an effort to generate clicks.

"Fine" in NFL talk typically means only a month of missed time (see both Mayo in 2010 and Chung in 2011 for recent examples of this) when discussing knee issues. Demps quite clearly injured his knee, the only real debate is the severity, which is something I already offered. Players are almost always hurt when the go in IR, it is just that they aren't always truly season ending injuries.
MRI on Demps came back back negative.
 
Are people here really trying to claim that there are no tricks played with the IR list?
 
If its true, then I am surprised. Still there's is no risk and some potential value here so there's not much to hate unless someone you like gets cut. (White makes the most sense of those suggested to me.)

I do not have high expectations for Blount because in Pittsburgh he reverted to his Tampa Bay form. He once again did NOT gain the tough yards in short yardage situations with any consistency. People here forget that for most of the first half of the season when he was with the Pats, Blount was the same soft RB who never ran like a big back. However for some reason (see Ivan Fears) for most of the second half of the season, Blount actually ran like a 250 lb RB. The transformation, to my mind, just showed how good the Pats coaching staff was. The problem was the coaching didn't seem to stick in Pittsburgh.

So the mystery that is Lagarrette Blount still remains. Will the team get the battering ram we saw the 2nd half of the season, or the underperforming, inconsistent, feast or famine, RB that he's been his whole career, EXCEPT for that short 8 game stretch last season. The answer is, "who knows". I doubt BB knows either, but he obviously he thinks its worth the risk.

At worst he could be gone before the season ends, at best he's a valued back up who has a skill set that's needed.
Blount was a near 1000 yard back before the Pats got him last year. But he didn't produce for a while before Tampa Bay gave up on him.

He was and is, a good between the tackles runner, but he has never been a receiving threat.
 
Not entirely accurate. He can practice for three weeks without counting, it isn't until NE activates him off of IR that they must make an adjacent roster move.
I do NOT believe that Siliga has PARTICIPATED in practice. I don't believe that walk-throughs count. We have at least 19 days before a decision has to be made. We might have even more. Of course, the real issue is when Siliga would be ready to improve the team by his activation.
 
Are people here really trying to claim that there are no tricks played with the IR list?

My point was that Belichick is bit more "accurate" with his IR lists than used to be the case. That being the case, of course, White COULD be injured in the next couple of weeks. I do believe that the CBA dealt with this a bit.

In any case, I would expect a cut from one of the many, many special teamers, perhaps one of the safeties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top