chasa
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2012
- Messages
- 6,254
- Reaction score
- 7,670
I'm not on any "Got to have Jackson!" crusade, because I could certainly understand someone who'd prefer more LB, HB or DL help, for example. But, there's a difference between thinking you could use upgrades elsewhere more than what you might think Jackson would do, and bleating out inanities like "chemistry suicide" and the like.
When was the last time a team brought in an offensive weapon at the trade deadline and it worked out right away?