1) No we weren't - - we were running the ball to kill seconds off the clock - - you yourself said so. There were 10 in the box for the Jets
This is where you go off the tracks.
You run because you do not want an incomplete pass. That does not mean you don't try to run effectively.
MANY teams gain first downs on the ground in those situations. Calling it a kneel down is saying we can't run against that defense.
2) I ALL the runs counts, then let's put back in the 17 yarder that deus cherry picked and keep them ALL in. So we are right back to 15 for 63, 4.2 ypc. Not a reason to go 37-15 PtoR.
Its not a math problem. You have to use some insight.
If you seriously think we did a good job running the ball consistently in that game, and would have moved the ball well with a heavy dosage of runs, we should just stop here, because I think that is 100% wrong.
Outside of one well blocked play, we ran 14 for 46. Yes, the one counts, but it is an outlier, not indicative of how we blocked the run all day long. That makes sense doesn't it?
Additionally, we ran draws from the shotgun, we ran on passing downs, we did everything we could to make it look like we weren't running. If we came in with a run heavy approach, we would not have run well.
Your argument is akin to saying running on 3rd and 1 is the same as running on 3rd and 25. If you get 12 on 3rd and 25 you have a good running game and will convert 3rd and 1.
As is always the case with your posting on run/pass ratios, you ignore context.