- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Two really good points.
However, I think it depends on the context of the fighting. Steve Smith has the reputation of being ultra-competive (as well as a genuinely tough dude) who would run through a wall to win.
We don't know the circumstances of Harvin's fights, but he hardly has the reputation as a tough, ultra-competitive win-at-all-costs type.
Plus, Harvin is reputed to have taken himself out of the game and then refused to go back in when the coaches asked him to last Sunday (and perhaps not-so-coincidently he was traded 5 days later). Can you imagine an ultra-competitive warrior like Steve Smith doing something like that?
What's happening in Seattle is textbook post-move smearing, and we've seen it done here in New England often enough that we should know better than to buy into it all. We certainly don't have anything approaching the whole story regarding the game where he allegedly took himself out.
And, as for the Steve Smith comparison, Smith is the player who's actually been suspended for fighting, on two separate occasions, not Harvin.