thenepatsrule
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2007
- Messages
- 4,041
- Reaction score
- 993
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Looked like a scene from Punk'dKudos to ST coach there.
Essentially winning the game on a fake punt deep in their own end even more amazing.
That was such an incredibly stupid call.
No it wasn't. You're 1-4, if you don't convert the fake punt you're gonna lose and be 1-5 anyway because Seattle on their last 3 drives had TD drives of 82, 91, and 80 yards.
That was such an incredibly stupid call.
The punt return for TD, and the fake punt (*Given the circumstances) are 2 rare plays you'll be lucky to see again. Very lucky win IMO.
It's not stupid if it works.
That's just rationalizing it
"Poker is making the wrong move at the right time".
So is football.
So it was a good play because they're 1-4 and suck?
No, they could have chosen to punt there and lose. The Seahawks offense was rolling.
Fake punt there and you have a chance, especially if you have noticed tendencies to exploit
Poker can actually be statistically modeled whereas football can not. So that quote doesn't really work here. The other issue is that football games and plays are such a small sample size anything you try and conclude using statistical analysis can be heavily debated, hence all the crappy stats sites that are out there.