PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Discuss the defense


Status
Not open for further replies.
Matt Kalil definitely doesn't suck. He's a better-than-league-average LT. Jones is just a lot better than he is.

And part of the reason why I like Jones so much is that he generates so much pressure without opening up running lanes. There was one play in particular on Sunday where there was a huge gap behind him, and if the RB (Asiata, I think it was) had gotten past him he would have ripped off a 15+ yard gain. But Jones was able to use his length to keep Kalil's hands off of him, disengage, and make a strong tackle for a loss of a yard or two. Plays like that go unheralded, but they're every bit as valuable as a sack. Most edge rushers not only lack the strength/length to disengage and make that tackle, but are so far upfield that they wouldn't have had any shot at making a play in the first place.
Sounds like you are describing a different play but on one, the RB was outside of Jones and he dove out and ankle tackled him. Great play.
 
As a 43 DE, Jones may be in the top 5 in the NFL vs the run.
I'll defer to you on that ranking. I just think that's his weak spot. Maybe last season is still resonating with me and even then, it's not always his fault when the edge dissolves, particularly when Jones or Vellano is next to him on the inside, and they are getting blown off of the ball.

Matt Kalil definitely doesn't suck. He's a better-than-league-average LT. Jones is just a lot better than he is.
I'm still getting used to the concept of us having a good defense, so my reflex is to assume that when our defense succeeds, it's because the opposition is beyond terrible. I watched the game on the condensed NFL game rewind, so I didn't catch that it was Matt Kalil. Chandler wasn't just beating him 1v1 with a move either, he was constantly forcing him back, even when the Vikings were chipping him.
 
That's because we all saw Jones being used as a 5 in Miami and it was a colossal failure, they couldn't stop the run or get pressure so everyone was left wondering what the hell they were up to, I know I was. But I also know that Belichick has had to have had something more in mind while putting this defense together and drafting for a 4-3 but playing a straight up 3-4 wasn't one of them. he has been positioning himself to run exactly what you guys are talking about, which is a series of hybrid packages they can move in and out of, and gathering players with the flexibility to run a variety of packages while still having the ability to play a base defense when necessary. Overall this is still too complex for me to grasp fully without seeing it actually play out on the field but I like what I saw in Minnesota and what i am hearing form you guys in terms of the possibilities it opens up for them going forward.

It's a very Belichick-like thing to do. I've posted in other threads Jens Bremel's 2010 series on NFL defense, and his description of Belichick's approach:

There’s no simple diagram or playbook quirk that defines Bill Belichick’s defense. Rather, it might be said that it’s the complete lack of one.

Belichick, in a very short span early in his career, was introduced to many different defensive schemes at the pro level. He was exposed to Maxie Baughan, who ran George Allen’s complex 4-3 scheme, whicht was full of pre-snap adjustments. He briefly coached with Fritz Shurmur, who would follow Allen (and others) as coordinators who frequently used nickel schemes as a base defense. He worked with Joe Collier, who turned a troublesome set of injuries to his front seven into Denver’s vaunted Orange Crush – maybe the original multiple-front scheme.

Those exposures came before he gained fame and respect under Bill Parcells and the true 3-4 in New England and New York.

The key to the success of Belichick’s style is flexibility of personnel. To be able to switch from a 4-3 to a 3-4 to a dime defense and all points in between requires versatility at nearly every position. Players have to be able to run and cover and hit. Linemen have to be strong enough to hold the point in the 3-4, but get upfield in a 4-3. Defensive backs have to be very good in zone coverage but competent in man coverage when needed. It requires special skills, but also an above-average football IQ. Compared with the base Dungy-Kiffin scheme, which probably started with as little as three or four fronts and a couple of zone coverages, Belichick’s hybrid is a maze meant to confuse and confound.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/...t-4-the-3-4-front/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

I can imagine that he's been waiting decades for the kind of personnel that would allow him to do these kind of things; he must be rubbing his hands with glee.
 
I agree. I haven't seen anything like this before. And when Collins is back, there will be even more ability to twist things up.

I am not an Xs and Os kind of fan.

But Im soo glad to read a rational discussion on the matter.

What I, amateur that I am, took away from week 1 was NOT that Belichick is a complete idiot and misusing his best players but that he was experimenting with something new.

Knowing Belichick, that something is going to be highly fluid and rely on players being versatile enough to play multiple roles.
 
I suppose that we have 2 groupings: DT's and DE/LB's. Among the LB's, we will always need on the play inside and be the signal caller.

DT: 2 positions and 3 backups
DE/LB: 4-5 positions and 2 backups (Moore and White don't really count)

And yes, we are especially thin in the base.
 
I agree that it seems the Belichick way to have a base front including exactly two 300 or so pound players (Easley slips into that mold). As Easley develops, that gives us WIlfork-Easley with Siliga-Jones as our backups.

Like Andy, I agree with this.

When Easley eventually develops into that role and Jamie Collins is back, things should really get interesting.
 
We ran the exact same defense in Miami as we did in Minnesota, except that Collins was out, so Skinner replaced him in base, and in sub HT moved to his spot and Nink played while he sat in sub vs Miami.

This week strength was on Jones side more often, so it was Nink playing the 5 tech.


I never said we didn't. What I said was that most of us were wondering what they were doing and opened this thread to discuss just that.
 
Most edge rushers not only lack the strength/length to disengage and make that tackle, but are so far upfield that they wouldn't have had any shot at making a play in the first place.

Much of that is scheme related. Even when 1-gapping, the Pats use a read-and-react approach in running situations, where discipline is maintained and leverage is gained while reading the play before attacking to make the play. Jones ability to fend-off his blocker, quickly disengage, and get after the runner (or QB, as the case may be), makes him a beast to defend. He had a couple of chances at ankle tackles on Moreno last week that didn't work out quite as well, but there as a lot more room to cover last week, prior to them tightening things up in practice this week.
 
We ran the exact same defense in Miami as we did in Minnesota, except that Collins was out, so Skinner replaced him in base, and in sub HT moved to his spot and Nink played while he sat in sub vs Miami.

This week strength was on Jones side more often, so it was Nink playing the 5 tech.

In the base D in week 1, Hightower lined-up at ROLB with Jones at 5-tech, whether that was strong or weak side. This might not have been uniformly the case, but it is what I've seen. (I'm thinking I may have to get the NFL Rewind, if I am going to keep-up with these conversations.) That may have been related to the limited depth at DT last week with everyone but Wilfork and Vellano just coming back from / still limited by injuries. I'm interested to seeing how this front evolves, as there are lots of possibilities.
 
In the base D in week 1, Hightower lined-up at ROLB with Jones at 5-tech, whether that was strong or weak side. This might not have been uniformly the case, but it is what I've seen. (I'm thinking I may have to get the NFL Rewind, if I am going to keep-up with these conversations.) That may have been related to the limited depth at DT last week with everyone but Wilfork and Vellano just coming back from / still limited by injuries. I'm interested to seeing how this front evolves, as there are lots of possibilities.
No that is not the case.
They did the same thing in both games in the base. Jones or Nink played standing up at OLB on the strong side, and down in a 5 tech on the weak side.
The frequency of Jones being a DE was high in week 1 and lower in week 2, but that was just based upon the strength of the formation.
I'd have to check if HT flipped or if Collins slid in week 1, but I believe he flipped.
 
I am not an Xs and Os kind of fan.

But Im soo glad to read a rational discussion on the matter.

What I, amateur that I am, took away from week 1 was NOT that Belichick is a complete idiot and misusing his best players but that he was experimenting with something new.

Knowing Belichick, that something is going to be highly fluid and rely on players being versatile enough to play multiple roles.


Agree completely. I was a soccer player as my school was so small we didn't have football when I was there, so my understanding of terminology and the more complex aspects of football is limited by that, but I have followed the game my whole life so I do understand it in overall terms and the basics. There are plenty of others here who have a really good grasp of the more complex aspects of it and that's why i asked them to discuss what they are doing, because from the most basic standpoint the way they opened the season on defense was confusing, but like you I recognized there was something more going on fundamentally and wanted to understand where they were going with this, which is why i have basically grabbed the popcorn and taken a seat to watch this discussion unfold.
 
I suppose that we have 2 groupings: DT's and DE/LB's. Among the LB's, we will always need on the play inside and be the signal caller.

DT: 2 positions and 3 backups
DE/LB: 4-5 positions and 2 backups (Moore and White don't really count)

And yes, we are especially thin in the base.

Judging from our formations so far, I think BB looks at it even more generic than that. I think BB sees DL and LBs. Players that play on the line and players that play off the line.
 
No that is not the case.
They did the same thing in both games in the base. Jones or Nink played standing up at OLB on the strong side, and down in a 5 tech on the weak side.
The frequency of Jones being a DE was high in week 1 and lower in week 2, but that was just based upon the strength of the formation.
I'd have to check if HT flipped or if Collins slid in week 1, but I believe he flipped.

It is certainly the case in the first pre-snap formation shown here:
http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2014...e-shift-beyond-rob-ninkovich-vs-dolphins.html
but maybe that's an outlier, seeing that Ninkovich is split-out on the WR on the weak side, which also isn't consistent with the base D approach we've been discussing.
 
Sounds like you are describing a different play but on one, the RB was outside of Jones and he dove out and ankle tackled him. Great play.

I know exactly what play you were talking about, and I agree that it was fantastic.

BTW, I went back and reviewed, and it looks like my memory served me very poorly on the play in question, since I was wrong about almost every (wrong runner, wrong blocker, wrong yardage). I was actually referring to the second play from scrimmage, which I think is a perfect example of how dominant and versatile Jones is. He's not just a pure edge rusher. Check it out:

jkhNVJh.png


The Vikings initially come out in a standard I formation with Rhett Ellison (TE2) as the FB. Patriots have 3 DL - Ninkovich playing 7 technique as SDE, and Wilfork on the strong side with Siliga on the weak side (both 2 technique). Chandler Jones is standing up as a 7-technique OLB

MHWKpdl.png


The Vikings send Ellison up to the line as TE2 on the weak side. Jones recognizes the threat of a run to the weak side, and responds by shifting to 9 technique to assume contain responsibility, and briefly moving into a three point stance (he goes back to standing up before the snap).

Side note: this is why I don't like the idea of Collins playing 3-4 OLB, and think WILB suits him much better. In the same situation, would anyone here trust him to consistently set the edge?

WILc352.png


At the moment that the ball is snapped, Jones is back in a two point stance, and Chung has moved up in run support on the strong side. Deonte Skinner is the WILB, Mayo is the SILB (basically the mike with Chandler down on the LOS), and Hightower is the SOLB.

The Vikings plan here seems pretty clear: Ellison was assigned to block Jones, enabling Matt Kalil to get to the second level and go after Deonte Skinner. Jarius Wright is at the top of the screen, with Revis matched up on him. Wright is in motion pre-snap, and Revis tails him across the formation. Wright is going to receive the handoff and run a jet sweep either out wide or through the lane on the weak side that's opened up by Kalil blocking Skinner and Ellison blocking Jones. Chung has already been removed from the play by coming up to support the strong side (if he hadn't, I assume they would've run strong side at Ninkovich and Hightower, behind Loadholt and Rudolph). Meanwhile, the strong side defenders will be occupied by Asiata, as they'll fake a hand-off to him and he'll try to run to the strong side.

Another side note: in week 1, the Vikings had Cordarrelle Patterson running jet sweeps instead of Wright. I'm wondering why they made the switch, and part of me wonders if it's because having Patterson run it would mean that they're running it at Revis. Revis is so strong in run support that I suspect Turner didn't have faith in Wright to make that block on him. Just another reason why he's so good, and might help explain why Revis wasn't put on patterson in the first place.

LjBwNTD.png


There's a few things going on here. Kalil is unable to get to Skinner, who is standing back and basically trying to limit the damage in the event that Wright gets past Jones. Instead, Kalil blocks Revis, who has followed Wright all the way across the formation and has put himself in position to make a tackle.

All in all, I'd say the Pats have handled this pretty well. In spite of all of the misdirection on the Vikings' part, they still have 3 guys (Revis, Skinner, Jones) on the weak side against 2 blockers.

Most crucially, though, notice that Jones has his arms fully extended, and as a result of his freakish length Ellison can't get his hands on him. Jones has already steered him 3 yards into the backfield, and he isn't done yet. You can already see that, if the original plan was for Wright to run a sweep (which it pretty clearly was, IMO) that play has been blown up by Jones forcing Ellison so far into the backfield.

4EeUmcd.png


I might need to post a few screenshots for this, just to show how thoroughly Chandler Jones is dominating Ellison here. It's crazy. Having already driven Ellison almost 5 yards into the backfield, Jones now disengages, throwing Ellison backward and completely eliminating the possibility of an outside run.

TNMcIhp.png


Wright runs directly into Ellison, who no longer has anything even vaguely resembling a block on Jones. Jones is able to tackle Wright easily for a five yard loss. But even if he hadn't been able to, by mandhandling the TE as he did, he would have at a bare minimum forced the run inside. This would've allowed Skinner and Revis a much better chance at making a play to limit the gain. Even Mayo has gotten off of his block and put himself in position to make a play in pursuit, because that's the kind of unnoticed thing that Mayo does pretty much every snap that he's on the field.

zDcjc0k.png


Ellison is forced to watch as a bystander while the guy that he was supposed to block tackles Wright 5-6 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Norv Turner is forced to consider that trying to block Jones with a tight end might have been a really, really bad call.
 
Last edited:
I know exactly what play you were talking about, and I agree that it was fantastic.

BTW, I went back and reviewed, and it looks like my memory served me very poorly on the play in question, since I was wrong about almost every detail in question (wrong runner, wrong blocker, wrong loss of yards). I was actually referring to the second play from scrimmage, which I think is a perfect example of how dominant and versatile Jones is. He's not just a pure edge rusher. Check it out:

jkhNVJh.png


The Vikings initially come out in a standard I formation with Rhett Ellison (TE2) as the FB. Patriots have 3 DL - Ninkovich playing 7 technique as SDE, and Wilfork on the strong side with Siliga on the weak side (both 2 technique). Chandler Jones is standing up as a 7-technique OLB

MHWKpdl.png


The Vikings send Ellison up to the line as TE2 on the weak side. Jones responds by shifting to 9 technique on Ellison's outside shoulder, and briefly moving into a three point stance (he goes back to standing up before the snap).

WILc352.png


At the moment that the ball is snapped, Jones is back in a two point stance, and Chung has moved up in run support on the strong side. Deonte Skinner is the WILB, Mayo is the SILB (basically the mike with Chandler down on the LOS), and Hightower is the SOLB.

The Vikings plan here seems pretty clear: Ellison was assigned to block Jones, enabling Matt Kalil to get to the second level and go after Deonte Skinner. Jarius Wright is at the top of the screen, with Revis matched up on him. Wright is in motion pre-snap, and Revis tails him across the formation. Wright is going to receive the handoff and try to run through the lane on the weak side that is opened up by Kalil blocking Skinner and Ellison blocking Jones. Chung has already been removed from the play by coming up to support the strong side (if he hadn't, I assume they would've run strong side at Ninkovich and Hightower, behind Loadholt and Rudolph). Meanwhile, the strong side defenders will be occupied by Asiata, as they'll fake a hand-off to him and he'll try to run to the strong side.

LjBwNTD.png


There's a few things going on here. Kalil is unable to get to Skinner, who is standing back and basically trying to limit the damage in the event that Wright gets past Jones. Instead, Kalil blocks Revis, who has followed Wright all the way across the formation and has put himself in position to make a tackle.

All in all, I'd say the Pats have handled this pretty well. In spite of all of the misdirection on the Vikings' part, they still have 3 guys (Revis, Skinner, Jones) on the weak side against 2 blockers.

Most crucially, though, notice that Jones has his arms fully extended, and as a result of his freakish length Ellison can't get his hands on him. Jones has already steered him 3 yards into the backfield, and he isn't done yet. You can already see that, if the original plan was for Wright to run a sweep (which it pretty clearly was, IMO) that play has been blown up by Jones forcing Ellison so far into the backfield.

4EeUmcd.png


I might need to post a few screenshots for this, just to show how thoroughly Chandler Jones is dominating Ellison here. It's crazy. Having already driven Ellison almost 5 yards into the backfield, Jones now disengages, throwing Ellison backward and completely eliminating the possibility of an outside run.

TNMcIhp.png


Wright runs directly into Ellison, who no longer has anything even vaguely resembling a block on Jones. Jones is able to tackle Wright easily for a five yard loss. But even if he hadn't been able to, by mandhandling the TE as he did, he would have at a bare minimum forced the run inside. This would've allowed Skinner and Revis a much better chance at making a play to limit the gain. Even Mayo has gotten off of his block and put himself in position to make a play in pursuit, because that's the kind of unnoticed thing that Mayo does pretty much every snap that he's on the field.

zDcjc0k.png


Ellison is forced to watch as a bystander while the guy that he was supposed to block tackles Wright 5-6 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Norv Turner is forced to consider that trying to block Jones with a tight end might have been a really, really bad call.

I would definitely pay for a website that breaks down entire games as clearly as you did right there. Great stuff..
 
I know exactly what play you were talking about, and I agree that it was fantastic.

BTW, I went back and reviewed, and it looks like my memory served me very poorly on the play in question, since I was wrong about almost every (wrong runner, wrong blocker, wrong yardage). I was actually referring to the second play from scrimmage, which I think is a perfect example of how dominant and versatile Jones is. He's not just a pure edge rusher. Check it out:

jkhNVJh.png


The Vikings initially come out in a standard I formation with Rhett Ellison (TE2) as the FB. Patriots have 3 DL - Ninkovich playing 7 technique as SDE, and Wilfork on the strong side with Siliga on the weak side (both 2 technique). Chandler Jones is standing up as a 7-technique OLB

MHWKpdl.png


The Vikings send Ellison up to the line as TE2 on the weak side. Jones recognizes the threat of a run to the weak side, and responds by shifting to 9 technique to assume contain responsibility, and briefly moving into a three point stance (he goes back to standing up before the snap).

WILc352.png


At the moment that the ball is snapped, Jones is back in a two point stance, and Chung has moved up in run support on the strong side. Deonte Skinner is the WILB, Mayo is the SILB (basically the mike with Chandler down on the LOS), and Hightower is the SOLB.

The Vikings plan here seems pretty clear: Ellison was assigned to block Jones, enabling Matt Kalil to get to the second level and go after Deonte Skinner. Jarius Wright is at the top of the screen, with Revis matched up on him. Wright is in motion pre-snap, and Revis tails him across the formation. Wright is going to receive the handoff and run a jet sweep either out wide or through the lane on the weak side that's opened up by Kalil blocking Skinner and Ellison blocking Jones. Chung has already been removed from the play by coming up to support the strong side (if he hadn't, I assume they would've run strong side at Ninkovich and Hightower, behind Loadholt and Rudolph). Meanwhile, the strong side defenders will be occupied by Asiata, as they'll fake a hand-off to him and he'll try to run to the strong side.

Side note: in week 1, the Vikings had Cordarrelle Patterson running jet sweeps instead of Wright. I'm wondering why they made the switch, and part of me wonders if it's because having Patterson run it would mean that they're running it at Revis. Revis is so strong in run support that I suspect Turner didn't have faith in Wright to make that block on him. Just another reason why he's so good, and might help explain why Revis wasn't put on patterson in the first place.

LjBwNTD.png


There's a few things going on here. Kalil is unable to get to Skinner, who is standing back and basically trying to limit the damage in the event that Wright gets past Jones. Instead, Kalil blocks Revis, who has followed Wright all the way across the formation and has put himself in position to make a tackle.

All in all, I'd say the Pats have handled this pretty well. In spite of all of the misdirection on the Vikings' part, they still have 3 guys (Revis, Skinner, Jones) on the weak side against 2 blockers.

Most crucially, though, notice that Jones has his arms fully extended, and as a result of his freakish length Ellison can't get his hands on him. Jones has already steered him 3 yards into the backfield, and he isn't done yet. You can already see that, if the original plan was for Wright to run a sweep (which it pretty clearly was, IMO) that play has been blown up by Jones forcing Ellison so far into the backfield.

4EeUmcd.png


I might need to post a few screenshots for this, just to show how thoroughly Chandler Jones is dominating Ellison here. It's crazy. Having already driven Ellison almost 5 yards into the backfield, Jones now disengages, throwing Ellison backward and completely eliminating the possibility of an outside run.

TNMcIhp.png


Wright runs directly into Ellison, who no longer has anything even vaguely resembling a block on Jones. Jones is able to tackle Wright easily for a five yard loss. But even if he hadn't been able to, by mandhandling the TE as he did, he would have at a bare minimum forced the run inside. This would've allowed Skinner and Revis a much better chance at making a play to limit the gain. Even Mayo has gotten off of his block and put himself in position to make a play in pursuit, because that's the kind of unnoticed thing that Mayo does pretty much every snap that he's on the field.

zDcjc0k.png


Ellison is forced to watch as a bystander while the guy that he was supposed to block tackles Wright 5-6 yards behind the line of scrimmage. Norv Turner is forced to consider that trying to block Jones with a tight end might have been a really, really bad call.


That defense is a 43. Not because of whether Jones is up or down, but because of the LB alignment. All 3 are inside the DEs.
 
That defense is a 43. Not because of whether Jones is up or down, but because of the LB alignment. All 3 are inside the DEs.

It functionally might as well be a 4-3, since whether Jones is in a two point or three point stance is mostly trivial. As such, it's a great example of how the 4-3 vs. 3-4 doesn't necessarily tell you much about each player's assignment. But it's three down linemen and four linebackers: that's the definition of a 3-4.
 
I have a question: I've seen it posted everywhere that our scheme primarily didn't change between week 1 and 2, but that the biggest diff was what the O chose to be the strong side vs weak side...

So my question is, why wouldn't an O purposefully make the strong side be on jones side rather than ninks do that jones has to go into a 3 pt stance playing 5 tech, which seems to limit him as a pass rusher? (Compared to when he is in a 2 pt more OLB role)

Seems to me this way the opposing offense gets to decide what our defenders do, and minimize their impact?
 
Ninkovichs side is the strong side.
And it is consistent, Nink is just wider than normal because of the formation.

The TE is clearly to the left side of the offensive formation in the first pre-snap image. Are you indicating that the Pats D is responding to the two wide receivers on the right side of the offensive formation as an indication of line strength?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Back
Top