- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
Unfortunately this may affect the Patriots vis a vis Cameragate regarding the perception of how the NFL reports or disposes of what they have in an investigation.
Only to people who already have the narrative written in their heads. Bountygate showed the absolute opposite of this: that Goodell will fabricate evidence and lie about the contents of what little evidence he has... if it suits his purposes to do so.
What all three incidents have in common is that they demonstrate how Goodell metes out punishment based entirely on what he thinks the public opinion is. With Spygate and Boutygate, the public outrage was there immediately, so he immediately went nuclear in his punishment. To the point that, when Bountygate was actually investigated, it was found that he didn't have the evidence or authority to give the punishments that he gave.
In this case, he thought that people wouldn't care much, so he under-punished. When the public outrage finally reached the point where he couldn't ignore it, he went back and retroactively issued the nuclear punishment for the same offense that was previously only worth 2 games.
Basically, he showed that he has no concept of judging based on actual evidence, or of proportionate response. That's the common thread through Spygate, Bountygate, and this.