- Joined
- Oct 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,819
- Reaction score
- 2,007
You know what the end result was for this guy?
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/jets-fan-punched-woman-due-court-article-1.1514734
New jets' cheerleader coach?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You know what the end result was for this guy?
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/jets-fan-punched-woman-due-court-article-1.1514734
I was listening to dan patrick today and he made good point. The way he dragged her out out and stepped over her after knocking her out is even more disturbing.
Yes they do. And the people whining and complaining the loudest about this issue won't be doing that.
And the NFL knows it.
He treated her like a piece of meat dragging her out of the elevator, and appeared unconcerned and even mildly annoyed that she took so long to come around.
I wrote a response to the preceding post but I deleted it because I remembered the proven axiom...."never argue with the idiotic"...
WTF is next?..your honor...I HAD to knock her out, she was hysterical
Most reasonable people wouldn't come to the conclusion you did given the prior evidence.I'm saying that an unprovoked full force punch hard enough to knock someone out > backing up in fist fight you started and knocking someone over with a punch that leads them to be knocked out by the environment. The NFL has come to different decisions based on each understanding, and I'm saying the greater outrage from the NFL should have came before we ever saw the video.
Don't worry, I'm still wearing my White Knight gear
I thought the previous evidence was only her being dragged out of the elevator knocked out, knowing it was Rice who did it. Without knowing about the elevator railing I don't know what other plausible conclusion there was to come to.Most reasonable people wouldn't come to the conclusion you did given the prior evidence.
While the suspension is currently indefinite, I don't think anyone thinks the NFL has the authority to make it permanent. Heck, many people think they don't even have the authority to lengthen it beyond the original 2 games but even if they do, anything beyond the 6 game "first offense" ban would be very tough to uphold.and today Goodell sets the stage for a future Ray Rice return to the NFL!
Goodell says that before Monday the evidence against Ray was rice "ambiguous":
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/10/goodell-says-evidence-was-ambiguous-before-video-emerged/
If so, it was only ambiguous because the league found it convenient to let it be so - to allow Rice's fiancee to claim partial responsibility for the incident and Rice's lawyer to float "hypothetical" scenarios without requesting the evidence that would definitively these "ambiguities".
It was convenient for the NFL to overlook the evidence and give Rice a slap on the wrist. Now it's expedient for them to do damage control and throw him under the bus, regardless of the CBA rules.
Goodell says that before Monday the evidence against Ray was rice "ambiguous":
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/10/goodell-says-evidence-was-ambiguous-before-video-emerged/
If so, it was only ambiguous because the league found it convenient to let it be so - to allow Rice's fiancee to claim partial responsibility for the incident and Rice's lawyer to float "hypothetical" scenarios without requesting the evidence that would definitively these "ambiguities".
It was convenient for the NFL to overlook the evidence and give Rice a slap on the wrist. Now it's expedient for them to do damage control and throw him under the bus, regardless of the CBA rules.