The agitated Post-Game thread

dont think this is a 12 win team, 10-6 at best. Just not enough depth on both lines and the offensive scheme and players are not explosive enough for physical defenses. No one is scared of brady going over the top so everyone just punches them in the mouth.

Hey, watch your language. Bill has nothing to do with the o-line. It's Stevan Riddddddddley and Matt Patricia's fault.

I actually think there were a lot of positives for the Pats, but they didn't play a complete game effort wise, showed some rust with players that had been injured and are having growing pains in predictable areas, that is both lines.

I expect improvement with Gronk and Easley and hope the right Oline combinations will include different players (stork, whoever).

Having said that, they have enough talent to win today, they have enough team work to win today, they simply put in one quarter of effort in a four quarter game.

Miami, like most any team, has enough talent and coaching to win games when they work harder than the other team.

Why weren't we allowed to touch the quarterback? Pathetic. The call on Hightower was some flash football garbage. He drove and didn't use his legs for anything outside of creating contact. That last call on Chandler ten minutes after the hit while tannehil does his best fifa impersonation to draw the call...****ing awful.

Marinlik said:

For me the defensive formation was the biggest problem for us. It really doesn't fit our top players. Putting Easley on the egde, putting Chandler Jones in the middle where he gets double teamed. Huge holes to run in. I just don't see why we would use this scheme with our current personel, and that's what I've said since we first saw it. It just eliminates our best players and put them in far less than ideal positions. ,

What do you guys think about the scheme?

Click to expand...

Well you forget that Easley was getting great pressure off the edge in preseason, while Chandler struggled at DE. Oh wait...

It doesn't matter who you have at reciever or in the secondary if your Lines are trash.

I think that bearded guy with the girl's name deserves all the blame. And Stevan Ridddddley.

disappointing game on so many levels

Good thing we won that bidding war for his services from Carolina because they were just as desperate for talent.........

The defence couldn't tackle for ****. Don't let go!

The o-line couldn't block for ****. Brady has zero time to make his passes to no-one for most of the game! And when there were players to make the catch, it was over thrown!

Stupid penalties killed us at times! Hooman will want to forget that game by quickly! Only good run from Ridley was due to his holding offence!

At half time we were one bad snap from being up 20-3! Second half was some of the worst football I have seen this team play!

No single person is to blame, we win as a team, we lose as a team! That was a team loss! The team are at fault!

Seeing the Pats play for the first time in person next week with my Dad. Who happens to be a Vikings fan.

Not as confident as I'd hoped to be

Brady has been fetal positioned down there before...in his late 20's.

They got beat today...everywhere...especially the coaching.

Is this the end half this crybaby fan base has been screaming for? Time will soon tell...

Its so true. And when both trenches get completely dominated...you get this game.

Oh well. Looking forward to a better game next week.

TonyTucker said:

I think that bearded guy with the girl's name deserves all the blame. And Stevan Ridddddley.

Click to expand...

Just looked at the stats for Ridley. Not a single tackle. What a bum...

I really have no words for the decision to play Jones at 3-4 DE. I mean, what really can you say? Bill must be losing his mind.

Mr. Patricia needs to wake up.

With the talent there that we have there is no excuse. Then it's abysmal coaching

Chandler and Easley are both 4-3 players. We drafted them while running mostly a 4-3.

Now the defense switched to 3-4. WHY? I don't see any reason for this defense to go 3-4.

Chandler is much more effective as a 43 DE. Borderline Pro Bowler at that position. But he was ineffective as 34 DE.... he's about 20-30lbs underweight for that position. WHY utilize one of your best defensive players the wrong way. Ugh!

Ninkovich always performed much better in a 4-3 as well.

Vellano is one of last guys I want to see getting a lot of snaps on defense. Can anyone seriously tell me this guy is btter than Tommy Kelly? Why did we cut Kelly again? Disgusting.

That was the worse OL I've seen from the pats in years. I can't remember the last time it looked that bad. Brady could do nothing he had no time at all.

The proliferation of talent on D suggests it is a coaching and scheme issue.

TonyTucker said:

I agree, it's Riddddddddddley's fault for everything. Him and that bearded guy who holds a clipboard. I think his name is Patricia or something.

Click to expand...

If someone told you this was funny, they were wrong. You're annoying as F#@