Whom Do We Wish To Win Week One?

THURS
GB @ SEA: I like my man Wilson a lot & the Seahags but I feel their DL and DBs present the worst case opponent in the SB, so I'm rooting for GB so that SEA does not have home field thru the playoffs making the SB run easier. Revis will help contain Rogers in the SB.

SUN 1PM:
NO @ ATL: Once again I'm a Brees fan but since NO's offense is so multi-faceted the Revis take-away of one WR is less of a factor in the SB, so it's ATL for me.

CIN @ BAL: Both are AFC threats. Hate the Ravens far more. Going with the dumber QB & coach CIN.

BUF @ CHI: Almost feel like giving a sympathy f*** here to pathetic BUF but no, going with CHI.

WAS @ HOU: Kinda like RGIII and HOU in an alternate universe could be an AFC threat. Go Skins!

TEN @ KC: Could not care less at week one

NE @ MIA: Squish the fish Pats 31-13

OAK @ NYJ: We are all Raiders fans now. Would love to see this game for hilarity's sake.

JAX @ PHIL: Like Chip Kelly. Going with Philly week one.

CLE @ PIT: Want ex-Pat QB Hoyer to kick Squealer ass. Can't believe pundits picking PIT for the SB.

MIN @ STL: Rooting for ex-Pat QB Matt Cassel here. Minn.

SUN 4PM
SF @ DAL: SF because I want the Seagulls to sweat their season

CAR @ TB: We OWE TB for all the players they've given us. Bucs all the way baby!

SUN 8:30PM
IND @ DEN: Both serious AFC threats. Going with Indy whom I no longer hate with Polian & Frankenstein gone. Rooting for the Broncs to go 9-7

MON 7:10
NYG @ DET: I love seeing Goober toss pick after pick. Throw him to the Lions! DET is my pick.

MON 10:20 PM
SD @ ARI: Rooting for Zona as SD is an AFC threat

It's too early to get worked up about this except for rooting for Denver & Jets to be embarrassed

THURS
GB @ SEA: In an era designed to encourage offense, seeing an elite D bludgeon a good O is great.

SUN 1PM:
NO @ ATL: Don't care.
CIN @ BAL: I like Geno Atkins.
BUF @ CHI: Jay Cutler's face is enough to pull for a division rival.
WAS @ HOU: RGME. Enough said.
TEN @ KC: Don't care.
NE @ MIA: Obvious comment.
OAK @ NYJ: Suckage must continue.
JAX @ PHIL: It would be good to see the AFC South competitive.
CLE @ PIT: Hoyer winning games means the dipshit doesn't get a start.
MIN @ STL: Robert Quinn.

SUN 4PM
SF @ DAL: Pulling for a sinkhole.
CAR @ TB: Looking forward to seeing the Tampa D.

SUN 8:30PM
IND @ DEN: Asteroid touchdown at Mile High.

MON 7:10
NYG @ DET: Stafford's fat head versus Manning face. Whoever loses, we win.

MON 10:20 PM
SD @ ARI: Larry Fitzgerald deserves better.

ausbacker said:

THURS
GB @ SEA: In an era designed to encourage offense, seeing an elite D bludgeon a good O is great.

SUN 1PM:
NO @ ATL: Don't care.
CIN @ BAL: I like Geno Atkins.
BUF @ CHI: Jay Cutler's face is enough to pull for a division rival.
WAS @ HOU: RGME. Enough said.
TEN @ KC: Don't care.
NE @ MIA: Obvious comment.
OAK @ NYJ: Suckage must continue.
JAX @ PHIL: It would be good to see the AFC South competitive.
CLE @ PIT: Hoyer winning games means the dipshit doesn't get a start.
MIN @ STL: Robert Quinn.

SUN 4PM
SF @ DAL: Pulling for a sinkhole.
CAR @ TB: Looking forward to seeing the Tampa D.

SUN 8:30PM
IND @ DEN: Asteroid touchdown at Mile High.

MON 7:10
NYG @ DET: Stafford's fat head versus Manning face. Whoever loses, we win.

MON 10:20 PM
SD @ ARI: Larry Fitzgerald deserves better.

Click to expand...

It's very hard to argue with these picks and the sound, but irrational, reasons why you made these selections. Except Buffalo. Week one is about getting up one game in the loss column. Go Bears.

Good luck with the sinkhole thing.

If it were possible, I'd want everyone except the Pats to lose. Closest thing would be for every game to end in a tie. Lol.

Wow. Good use of the word Whom. Most misused and unused word in the English language.

New England, Seattle, Chicago, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Philly

only cause I'm betting on them

rookBoston said:

Wow. Good use of the word Whom. Most misused and unused word in the English language.

Click to expand...

Alas, in this case it turns the teams into the object of the verb win, suggesting that we're hoping to win them as our prize in a contest. (The Jets, presumably, are the booby prize.)

Want OAk. Chi and pats. Everything else no worries for me.

Chi will absolutely dominate the bills..that spread is so sexy with a tease.

patchick said:

Alas, in this case it turns the teams into the object of the verb win, suggesting that we're hoping to win them as our prize in a contest. (The Jets, presumably, are the booby prize.)

Click to expand...

LOL, you're right, of course... we will wish to win Whom? Do we wish to win any of them, I wonder? Tragic misuse after all. I retract my kudos.