- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,091
- Reaction score
- 22,701
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Arrington is not done here. See Miguel's informative cap pages to grok the impact of cutting this BB contractual over reach in 2014. Good Bye in 2015 though.
In my opinion you're much better off having one player play the other safety position. Any real good team (i.e. one you'll face in the playoffs) will take advantage of the rotating players on the field. Do you think Manning would let Chung just play in the box and defend against the run? You need another safety who can tackle and cover or at least be adequate at both. Maybe that guy will be Ryan which I'm fine with. Or maybe Harmon will take a step in his 2nd year and be that guy. But please don't let me see Patrick Chung step on the field on defense for this Patriots team. What a disappointment that would be. His two biggest highlights as a Patriot in four years with the team came in one game and both were on special teams (@MIAMI 2010).
Posters often do not have the same valuations as Belichick.I still don't understand why they gave Arrington that deal? Decent slot guy but that is it.
I do think Ryan has potential to be the best safety in the team (besides McC), but it does make the decision of drafting Tavon Wilson and Duron Harmon all more dubious.
Posters often do not have the same valuations as Belichick.
You think of Arrington as a decent slot guy and think that slot guys aren't worth $3M-$4M a year.
Belichick thinks that the best slot guys are well worth that money, and that Arrington is one of those guys.
Our nickel back (slot guy) is on the field about 70% of the time, more against certain teams. On of our starting DT's and 3rd LB are on the field less than that amount. A nickel back is as valuable as many of our starters. Some would think that we should consider that we have 2 "starting" linebackers and 3 "starting" corner backs.
Tavon Wilson was a pick made out of desperation. NO ONE who didn't work for the patriots considered him a top prospect at safety (most thought he was a mediocre corner). We were desperate to sign a safety. The availability of safeties that year when we picked was much worse than the 2014 situation at TE. Belichick took a shot. He missed. The only question remaining is whether Wilson is worth keeping as a backup, as our 4th or 5th safety or as our 10th defensive back.Why, they drafted Ryan as a CB and they drafted Wilson a year before him so Ryan wasn't even a consideration? I can understand the view that Wilson is closing in on bust territory but they were trying to fill the need to the best of their ability when they made the pick. it looks now like they were wrong and many here were right but they are still the ones with all of the information, we are just throwing darts.
Why?The coverage ability in the back end will be elite. He'll probably need to be subbed out on obvious running downs, though.
First don't assume that Ryan is a "safety" just yet. Like I've said before, don't get too caught up in labels this year, they aren't going to mean as much as in the past. I think we will see a lot of so called CB's playing back in the middle this year.Apparently, Belichick has moved on, although Wilson could still make the team. We have McCourty, Harmon and Ryan as our safeties. Belichick even brought in a #4 in Chung (starter for Philly, #4 for us).
I suspect that Arrington is done here and Dennard will be moved to the slot.
How do they know for sure when other teams are going to run?To use someone stronger against the run.
How do they know for sure when other teams are going to run?
How do they know for sure when other teams are going to run?