What the hell would you know about logic? You've already shown you're completely clueless about football and how any defense using a NT actually works.
People have already explained to you have the Pats defense would improve with Wilfork taking up two defenders in the pass rush. If you'd actually watched any Pats games in the last 7-8 years, you'd know that Wilfork is double teamed on every play he's on the field. That's not CLICHE. That's fact. Something you have a hard time grasping.
Chandler Jones showed that he improved over the previous year by putting up 11.5 sacks last year. The Patriots, as a team, put up 47 sacks. That was the MOST by a Patriots defense since Belichick took over. That's FACT you can't dispute. And guess what? Wilfork missed 13 games and Kelly 11. As was pointed out to you, Jones put up only 8.5 sacks in the 13 games that Wilfork wasn't on the field. If you had actually watched the games, you'd know that it was because Jones was getting double-teams quite a bit.
So, reason stands that with Both Wilfork and Jones on the field, the offense will either have to flip the strong side to Left side opposite Jones, go with a double TE set so they can double up Jones, or chip Jones with a RB and hope it's enough to keep Jones from getting to the QB. However, if they double up both Wilfork and Jones, that leaves Ninkovich and whomever is playing the 3/5 tech in one on one situations. It also leaves the LBers with no one to pick them up on a blitz.
