oldskool138
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 2,708
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm going out on a limb here. Rex will never coach for New England.
The funniest thing about this quote is that you are a PATRIOTS fan, .....
and our HoF coach's TWO most memorable personnel decisions were:
BENCHING BERNIE KOSAR (proabably the 2d most beloved QB in Browns history - after Otto Graham)
BENCHING DREW BLEDSOE (partial savior of the Patriots franchise)
We are talking about Ryan. He failed.And so did Tannebaum & co. Ryan isn't the only one who screwed up.
Since you keep arguing it was someone else fault, yes you are.You ARE putting words in my mouth. Did I say it wasn't his fault?
I am pinning the failure of the teams he coached and the way he coached them on him. For some reason you seem to want to take "Rex Ryan did a bad job" and think that means I said everyone else in the organization was perfect. You are indulged in an elaborate strawman to the point your every response is strawmanish.No. Again, for the 100th time, I am saying that to pin the failure of the franchise on the HC is silly. There were others complicit, such as Tannebaum for example. He is arguably one of the worse GM's in the game.
Of course that is competitive. They win more than they lose, they are in the playoffs more than the average team. What do you consider competitive?You said they've been competitive the last 15 years. In that period they are 137-119, and won the AFC east only ONCE. That is not competitive to me.
The funniest thing about this quote is that you are a PATRIOTS fan, .....
and our HoF coach's TWO most memorable personnel decisions were:
BENCHING BERNIE KOSAR (proabably the 2d most beloved QB in Browns history - after Otto Graham)
BENCHING DREW BLEDSOE (partial savior of the Patriots franchise)
But Belichick was villified and almost run out of town for benching Kosar, and your claim is no coach could ever bench Mark Sanchez because the guy you call the worst GM in the league liked him.Not interested in a BB vs. Ryan comparison. There is none.
Both Kosar and Bledsoe had more than ample time to prove themselves and didn't.
I think Bernie was in his 9th or 10th season when he was benched.
We are talking about Ryan. He failed.
Give whatever portion of responsiblity you want to a HC, and he failed at it.
Since you keep arguing it was someone else fault, yes you are.
Was he the coach? Did he fail? Excuses are irrelevant. I'm sure every coach who has ever failed can blame ownership and the GM.
I am pinning the failure of the teams he coached and the way he coached them on him. For some reason you seem to want to take "Rex Ryan did a bad job" and think that means I said everyone else in the organization was perfect. You are indulged in an elaborate strawman to the point your every response is strawmanish.
BTW, one of the worst GMs in the game is hyperbole. During his tenure in 7 seasons they went to the playoffs 3 times and the AFCCG twice. They had 4 winning seasons and 1 .500 season, and overall were 57-55.
That is not arguably one of the worst, it is medicore. Perhaps a better coaching hire in 2009 would have helped as well.
Of course that is competitive. They win more than they lose, they are in the playoffs more than the average team. What do you consider competitive?
I think your numbers are wrong but from 1997 to today they are 141-130 which is tied for 11th best among 32 teams. That is competitive.
They were also tied for 11th in playoff appearances.
They have a 7-7 playoff record over that time, which is the 9th most wins.
In other words 8 teams have won more playoff games and 23 have won fewer.
I don't know how you consider that not competitive. Being more successful than more teams than you are less successful seems to be a pretty good gauge of competitive, and certainly isn't the kind of organization that makes it impossible for a coach to succeed as you are implying.
But Belichick was villified and almost run out of town for benching Kosar, and your claim is no coach could ever bench Mark Sanchez because the guy you call the worst GM in the league liked him.
Did I say he "did not fail?" No, I didn't.
Why do you keep saying that as if anyone has ever said it is 100% his fault? The coaching part is 100% his fault.Again, how many times do I have to say it? My opinion is that to blame one person for the failure of an entire franchise is presumptuous.
They were better because of Favre the ONE year he was there.That is your opinion and that is your answer.
Tannebaum is the one who gave us a few joyous years with Favre and then helped to pull the strings for Sanchez which gave us more joy. He is complicit.
I will let his record speak to the job he did. It says he was a bit better than average.And yes, I think he is one of the worst GM's in the business. You say otherwise, but the Jets don't agree with you. They demoted him.
If you win more games than you lose and make the playoffs more time than average, how is that not competitive?I calculated from 1999, but even taking your numbers dating back to 1997, ELEVEN games above .500 is far from competitive to me.
Ryan is being held accountable for the job he has done.We're getting way off base here. My original argument is that to hold Ryan accountable for what's wrong with the franchise is silly.
Although I would say that in BB's case, he was justified as Kosar had almost 10 seasons to prove himself. Not popular with the fans, but maybe a different story with the FO or the owner.
OK, then why are you arguing a strawman?
You objected to the comments that he did a bad job.
Am I saying he is an awesome coach? No. He has plenty of flaws, but it's silly to pin everything that is wrong with the Jets, on him.
Why do you keep saying that as if anyone has ever said it is 100% his fault? The coaching part is 100% his fault.
They were better because of Favre the ONE year he was there.
If you win more games than you lose and make the playoffs more time than average, how is that not competitive?
How is being top 8-11 in the league in every metric of winning not competitive.
Are you saying that in a league where 12 teams make the playoffs, less than 8-11 are competitive?
You seem to be grasping at straws now.
Perhaps we should move on.
No one is 'pinning' anything on him but his responsibliities.Here is what I said about Ryan:
Did I say anything about his coaching? No. The premise of my argument is that to pin everything on him isn't an accurate portrayal of what's wrong with the Jets franchise.
They were definitely not better because Favre was there for one year. Maybe a very short term solution, but it hurt them over the long run. It pushed off their ability to rebuild for at least another year, and all the sideshow distractions didn't help (sexting lawsuit, et al).
Not really. The definition of a word is pretty much a fact. Ignoring the definition could be an opinion though.That's YOUR opinion, not a fact. You are entitled to your opinions. I would never be satisfied with a team who wins just 11 more games than they lose in over an entire decade.
I can find you 20 teams that would be happier with that than what they had.Please find me a Jets fan who is happy with that.
Just seems like the smart thing to do.You can move on if you want.
Which is the perfect indictment as to why they should at least consider getting rid of him. If the opposition feels comfortable with your coach and feels he isn't providing them with the best chance to win, it may be time for him to go.I don't want the Jets to fire Rex. He's hilarious. He's a good coach... he can win games. But he'll never be a great coach. He'll never bring a championship to New York. What if the Jets make a smart hire for once?! I rather stick with Rex!
Which is the perfect indictment as to why they should at least consider getting rid of him. If the opposition feels comfortable with your coach and feels he isn't providing them with the best chance to win, it may be time for him to go.
That being said, this sounds like a typical ploy by Rex to motivate his players.
There's literally 0% chance that Rex ends up here, guys. Too much has happened. ****, the "not here to kiss Belichick's rings" comment alone probably precludes it. Do you guys think he has no ego at all?
There's literally 0% chance that Rex ends up here, guys. Too much has happened. ****, the "not here to kiss Belichick's rings" comment alone probably precludes it. Do you guys think he has no ego at all?