PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Aaron Dobson - underestimated even as a rookie?


Absolutely..

There are any number of options at the position who may be able to play certain roles, so I imagine we'll have a much better read on that in the next 8 weeks. At this point all we can do is speculate.

The only reason I really brought Llyod up is due to his exceptional knowledge of the scheme run here, along with his experience. That, coupled with the fact that he'd definitely be coming on the cheap, leads me to believe that he'd be a fine addition to the WR corps in a lesser role.

I am glad that we're not keeping him as the WR2 myself, and that the team is attempting to upgrade the youth, speed, and ability to do certain things that he just isn't very good at anymore. Whether Belichick ends up feeling that he may be a possibility is anyone's guess, but I've had to think that bridge is burned and that ship has sailed at this point myself.

As Lloyd's ability to get down field has diminished with age his refusal to take a hit, or run after the catch is really a deal breaker.

It's a shame because he'd actually be a decent Z or Y receiver because he runs tight routes and has reliable hands.
 
He's obviously a bust since he didn't excel in his first mini-camp, ran a wrong route or two. And to think, we used to wait til training camp before declaring rookies as bust.

Until we have evidence to the contrary that WRs who struggle in their initial camp can still pan out and become competent - not even above-average, just competent! - players in the Pats system, you're betting against the odds. I can't recall it ever happening once in the last 10 years.

On a positive note, I like that they have a lot of these young WRs in camp now, just statistically one of them between Boyce, Hobson, Hawkins, and Thompkins should end up clicking, and they really only need one legit WR at this point.
 
Well, I'm going to lay it out on the line in a positive fashion, and just going to come out and say it. The 6'3, 200 pounder Aaron Dobson to me is the second best receiver out of the draft from a physical and "big moment" standpoint with his deceptive speed, crisp route running, and incredibly soft hands will put on the #17 and surprise a lot of people this year, and exceed beyond what people are expecting of him. He is not just a deep guy, but an intermediate and between the hash marks type of receiver as well. Like I said before, he didn't drop any passes his senior year which is rare for any college receiver and performed well even in snow. And I like that many of the pro's are high on him, now his peers which is always a good sign. And I'm absolutely fine with standing alone on my opinion because honestly him being compared to Moss and Fitzgerald, and being compared to Moss as the best prospect out of Marshall ever since is an accolade that just doesn't come at the rookie level. And there have been many talented receiver prospects out of Marshall since Mosses departure from that school, some odd 16 years ago. I also see a good tradition of Marshall receivers equaling to bright futures with the New England Patriots (RMoss + TBrown).... I'm a fan of this kid and expect not only for him to succeed but become a franchise receiver.. THIS season, yeah I'm going to get criticized but he will have a big year and immediate impact this season.:)
 
I like Dobson just fine but he does have some flaws in his game. First, he's a finesse receiver. He's a big guy who often tries to play the way a smaller guy like would. He’ll try cutbacks or reversals of field that he has no business attempting – especially considering down and distance situations. He doesn't use his bigger body to get physical with smaller DBs. Dobson tries to finesse defenders off the line of scrimmage when pressed although he’s built to get physical with a CB. Most of all, Dobson has to do a better job of using his body as a shield between the defender and the football. Fortunately, he's a smarter WR and he has remarkably soft hands. His low drop percentage must have really caught BB's eye. If the Pats can coach up his flaws, Dobson can earn a starting spot and contribute. Going into the draft, I was actually higher on Mark Harrison and Josh Boyce but both were injured for mini camp. Time will tell.

If that is the case then Dobson would have been a better fit in Pittsburgh (think of Roethlisberger rolling out trying to buy time), or with a quarterback like Michael Vick scrambling while the defense doesn't know if he will pass or run.

If Dobson is going to succeed with the Patriots the freelancing outlined above won't cut it; the Pats' offense is all based on the QB and the receiver both reading the defense the same way, and the receiver running a specific route according to that read. Mid route changes will result in at minimum incomplete passes, and at worse interceptions.
 
If that is the case then Dobson would have been a better fit in Pittsburgh (think of Roethlisberger rolling out trying to buy time), or with a quarterback like Michael Vick scrambling while the defense doesn't know if he will pass or run.

If Dobson is going to succeed with the Patriots the freelancing outlined above won't cut it; the Pats' offense is all based on the QB and the receiver both reading the defense the same way, and the receiver running a specific route according to that read. Mid route changes will result in at minimum incomplete passes, and at worse interceptions.

You're an excellent forum member. One of the most educated football minds I've ever had the pleasure of reading the posts of.

As someone who is looking to expand their knowledge this type of information is much appreciated.
 
You're an excellent forum member. One of the most educated football minds I've ever had the pleasure of reading the posts of.

As someone who is looking to expand their knowledge this type of information is much appreciated.

Thanks, but my football knowledge is relatively limited in comparison to many others that frequent this site. Wait until the season kicks off and you'll be treated to some genuine X's and O's analysis that far surpasses mine. I hit my ceiling when I graduated from working the concession stand to helping out as a special teams coach with my neighborhood Pop Warner team.
 
If that is the case then Dobson would have been a better fit in Pittsburgh (think of Roethlisberger rolling out trying to buy time), or with a quarterback like Michael Vick scrambling while the defense doesn't know if he will pass or run.

If Dobson is going to succeed with the Patriots the freelancing outlined above won't cut it; the Pats' offense is all based on the QB and the receiver both reading the defense the same way, and the receiver running a specific route according to that read. Mid route changes will result in at minimum incomplete passes, and at worse interceptions.

I think Chevs is saying the cutbacks and reversals are with the ball in his hands. That Dobson will have one defender to beat for a first down and instead of running over the guy with his 25lb weight advantage, he tries to jitterbug his way around him.
 
As Lloyd's ability to get down field has diminished with age his refusal to take a hit, or run after the catch is really a deal breaker.

It's a shame because he'd actually be a decent Z or Y receiver because he runs tight routes and has reliable hands.

The bolded part is exactly why I had hoped that they'd have been able to reach an agreement on a cheaper deal for a lessened role.

In my opinion, Llyod's positive traits such as his knowledge of the scheme, rapport with Brady, reliable hands, and his tight route running were all great attributes that could have helped to take over the "Branch" role of the past two years. On top of that, I think we'd have gotten something closer to the 2011 version of Branch (51 catches) vs the 2012 version (16 catches).

Unfortunately, they couldn't agree on terms and I'd have to guess that Brandon may have found it in his better interests to gamble on himself as a WR2 or WR3 for one of the other 31 teams; especially after a decently productive season last year.

How much Llyod's supposed "bad attitude" or character concerns may come into play here are anyone's guess and only Belichick probably really knows the full truth, but after the offseason we've had my assumption is that if any of it were true--Llyod's ship in NE has long sailed at this point.
 
Well, I'm going to lay it out on the line in a positive fashion, .......... He is not just a deep guy, but an intermediate and between the hash marks type of receiver as well. Like I said before, he didn't drop any passes his senior year which is rare for any college receiver and performed well even in snow. ............... I'm a fan of this kid and expect not only for him to succeed but become a franchise receiver.. THIS season, yeah I'm going to get criticized but he will have a big year and immediate impact this season.:)

Please STOP REPEATING this MULTITUDINOUSLY DEBUNKED MYTH. Even in THIS SAME THREAD - IT HAS ALREADY BEEN DISPROVED!!!

He had 2 drops in the VERY FIRST video URL which was posted in the DRAFT DAY THREAD and that video was within the SAME POST (by the SAME GUY who) started promulgating that myth.

I dont know what his actual drop % is; but judging by his 2 drops on 9 targets in that one game video I saw; it seems like he has average ACTUAL catch %s. But since stats for a college player are very likely to be NOT as RELIABLE as NFL stats (target #s are subjective anyway); you can point to any summary you want saying he has a 90+% rate and I wont believe it.

Show me a site where someone ACTUALLY WATCHED VIDEO AND COUNTED (which I think will come out more like the 70% I saw in the one game) and I will accept the argument that he has above avg hands - but PERFECT - PUUHHHHH-LEAASE Just Stop that.
 
The bolded part is exactly why I had hoped that they'd have been able to reach an agreement on a cheaper deal for a lessened role.

In my opinion, Llyod's positive traits such as his knowledge of the scheme, rapport with Brady, reliable hands, and his tight route running were all great attributes that could have helped to take over the "Branch" role of the past two years. On top of that, I think we'd have gotten something closer to the 2011 version of Branch (51 catches) vs the 2012 version (16 catches).

Unfortunately, they couldn't agree on terms and I'd have to guess that Brandon may have found it in his better interests to gamble on himself as a WR2 or WR3 for one of the other 31 teams; especially after a decently productive season last year.

How much Llyod's supposed "bad attitude" or character concerns may come into play here are anyone's guess and only Belichick probably really knows the full truth, but after the offseason we've had my assumption is that if any of it were true--Llyod's ship in NE has long sailed at this point.

I think the team decided they didn't want Lloyd at any price for any role. I also think rapport with Brady was actually a problem, they were clearly off all season, save for one terrific half against SF. His hands are overrated, great at unbelievable catches, average at the normal ones. He was also the worst YAC receiver I've ever seen, bar none.

I view Lloyd's absence as an overall positive for the offense and I'm thrilled to see him go.
 
If that is the case then Dobson would have been a better fit in Pittsburgh (think of Roethlisberger rolling out trying to buy time), or with a quarterback like Michael Vick scrambling while the defense doesn't know if he will pass or run.

If Dobson is going to succeed with the Patriots the freelancing outlined above won't cut it; the Pats' offense is all based on the QB and the receiver both reading the defense the same way, and the receiver running a specific route according to that read. Mid route changes will result in at minimum incomplete passes, and at worse interceptions.

The piece that the Patriots offense lacked at the WR position is the ability to go up and get the ball even while covered. If Dobson can continue his college success of going up and getting the ball, something Lloyd failed to do here, I think we will all be very happy with his performance.
 
Please STOP REPEATING this MULTITUDINOUSLY DEBUNKED MYTH. Even in THIS SAME THREAD - IT HAS ALREADY BEEN DISPROVED!!!

He had 2 drops in the VERY FIRST video URL which was posted in the DRAFT DAY THREAD and that video was within the SAME POST (by the SAME GUY who) started promulgating that myth.

I dont know what his actual drop % is; but judging by his 2 drops on 9 targets in that one game video I saw; it seems like he has average ACTUAL catch %s. But since stats for a college player are very likely to be NOT as RELIABLE as NFL stats (target #s are subjective anyway); you can point to any summary you want saying he has a 90+% rate and I wont believe it.

Show me a site where someone ACTUALLY WATCHED VIDEO AND COUNTED (which I think will come out more like the 70% I saw in the one game) and I will accept the argument that he has above avg hands - but PERFECT - PUUHHHHH-LEAASE Just Stop that.

Dobson has shown the ability to make the circus catch but then go on to drop simple rcatchable balls. This is a concentration issue that can be fixed by spending lots of time with Mr. Jugs.
 
If that is the case then Dobson would have been a better fit in Pittsburgh (think of Roethlisberger rolling out trying to buy time), or with a quarterback like Michael Vick scrambling while the defense doesn't know if he will pass or run.

If Dobson is going to succeed with the Patriots the freelancing outlined above won't cut it; the Pats' offense is all based on the QB and the receiver both reading the defense the same way, and the receiver running a specific route according to that read. Mid route changes will result in at minimum incomplete passes, and at worse interceptions.

I think Chevs is saying the cutbacks and reversals are with the ball in his hands. That Dobson will have one defender to beat for a first down and instead of running over the guy with his 25lb weight advantage, he tries to jitterbug his way around him.

Thanks, Os. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been. When assessing Dobson I think it's important to remember his pre-draft ranking among WRs. Most of the media and interwebz 'scouts' had him pegged anywhere from the 12-13 range as far down as the 20th ranked WR in the draft. (Some sites had Mark Harrison ranked ahead of Dobson) I want to like him and I try to be optimistic but his pre-draft ranking makes me temper my enthusiasm not only when I compare him to some of the WRs BB chose to pass over but also when I watch him on film. For me, it's another lesson in the lack of importance BB puts on the X position.

That may be too negative an outlook for Dobson, idk. He has many good qualities but for me Dobson's issue is his natural softness. I think teaching mental and physical toughness to a naturally soft player is one of the hardest things to teach. His softness reminds me of Moss and, I hate to say it, Brandon Lloyd. In fact, to me, he's a taller version of Lloyd. Like Lloyd, he can make spectacular plays on a ball with extraordinary body control but he's also frustrating when he goes down or reverses direction to avoid contact. The good news is that if you liked Lloyd, Dobson should appeal to you, too.

Here's a great article on Lloyd I found yesterday.

One way to evaluate the effectiveness of receivers is to look at "targets." A wide receiver may have 4 catches for 55 yards, but that's a very different performance if the quarterback looked the receiver's way 10 times or 4. Targets are still under-reported for college players - neither ESPN.com nor sports-reference.com lists them - but through combing the play-by-play data we can often find them.

I'm really interested in the Patriots' selection of Aaron Dobson, the wide receiver out of Marshall, in the second round in June's draft. Dobson's numbers - 57 catches for 679 yards, 3 touchdowns - are pedestrian for a receiver drafted so highly. If we factor in targets, do Dobson's numbers look more impressive?

Game Targets Catches Yards Comp% Y/A
WVU 7 4 72 0.57 10.29
WCU 11 9 81 0.82 7.36
OHIO 17 11 94 0.65 5.53
RICE 7 5 66 0.71 9.43
PUR 11 3 42 0.27 3.82
TUL 13 10 128 0.77 9.85
USM 9 5 63 0.56 7.00
UCF 10 5 68 0.50 6.80
MEM 1 1 4 1.00 4.00
ECU 5 4 61 0.80 12.20
TOTAL 91 57 679 0.63 7.46

Ultimately, targets don't really change the picture that much. Dobson is an efficient, productive college player, but there's nothing here that screams "second-round pick." The 63% completion percentage when throwing Dobson's way was actually below Marshall's 70% average as a team, and his 7.46 yards per target is just a hair over the Thundering Herd's 7.22 as a whole.

Dobson's lack of statistical progress from his sophomore (44 catches for 689 yards and 5 TDs) to his senior year often gets blamed on quarterback Rakeem Cato's inability to complete deep passes and on a spread offense that opened things for slot man Tommy Shuler more than Dobson. Is that accurate? It's hard to tell. There's only one cut-up from Dobson's 2012 season, a YouTube clip covering the West Virginia and Central Florida games:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZB7QRqAphso?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

You can see the elements that work against Dobson in these highlights. At about 0:58, you can see Dobson badly burn the defending corner for what would have been a long gainer, but Cato overthrows him. At 2:48, Cato throws a jump-ball that Dobson makes a great catch on, but the throw carries him out of bounds. Marshall constantly deploys three or four wide receivers, so Dobson rarely gets to run posts or other long routes. He's often running curls or quick outs, such as in the first play on the tape. Of course, the Patriots are known for spreading the field and throwing a lot of quick routes, so I'm not sure the New England system will be more favorable. While Dobson has a reputation for great hands, he does drop a couple balls against UCF (at 2:15 and 3:18). He rarely gets much yardage after the catch, though he does break a tackle for a big gain at 4:07.

I was hoping to blown away by Dobson after looking at the target data and the film, but I'm not. I do think the superficial numbers undersell his performance a bit due to the time missed with injury. His overall skill set - savvy route-running while allows him to get open despite average speed and quickness, tremendous body-control for spectacular catches but occasional drops, limited run after catch ability - remind me of Brandon Lloyd, the man he might replace in New England. At 6'3", he's got considerably more size than Lloyd (6'0"), but profiles along the same lines. Anyone expecting the second coming of fellow Marshall alum Randy Moss is almost certain to be disappointed.
Dave Breaks Down Film: Aaron Dobson - Target Rundown
 
The pre-draft rankings are bunk, especially for the WRs.
 
I think the team decided they didn't want Lloyd at any price for any role. I also think rapport with Brady was actually a problem, they were clearly off all season, save for one terrific half against SF. His hands are overrated, great at unbelievable catches, average at the normal ones. He was also the worst YAC receiver I've ever seen, bar none.

I view Lloyd's absence as an overall positive for the offense and I'm thrilled to see him go.

I don't think that they "didn't want him at any price, for any role" or they wouldn't have offered him a lesser deal to stay.

I'm thrilled to see him go as our WR2, without a doubt. I wouldn't argue one bit about any of his weaknesses that you mention, although we probably don't see things exactly the same in a few areas which is to be expected.

But at the same time I was kind of hoping that he'd have been signed more cheaply for a lesser role that was similar to one that Branch has held lately. I believe that he could do that just fine, possibly with a nice improvement.

I'm not one of those fans that is whining over losing Llyod by any means, because the position needed improved upon; but in the same vein I also felt that it would have left our WR corps in better shape depth-wise. At any rate, it didn't happen so it's time to move on.
 
I don't think that they "didn't want him at any price, for any role" or they wouldn't have offered him a lesser deal to stay.

I didn't hear that they had. I just googled it and saw a couple articles mention a source saying there were discussion of a restructured contract, but that could easily mean Lloyd's side pushing and the Patriots just saying, "one year, minimum, no guarantees" or something like that.

Do you have a link that says that the Patriots officially made another offer?
 


Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Back
Top