- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 17,389
- Reaction score
- 16,875
I think the Branch/Gaffney cuts (particularly Gaffney) in combination with making Edelman the WR2, and the significant transition away from the Welker-centric passing game, are things that deserve a very skeptical eye. You, apparently, don't. Saying my position in ludicrous, after what we've seen so far, is more than a little much, IMO, but you're welcome to your opinion.
Have a good one.
I dont think it is more than a little much at all. Bottom line is Brady is on pace for around 4,900 yards passing and we have been running the ball more than in the past and being skeptical of this is ludicris.
What is your logic in being skeptical? One of the guys you mentioned above is back already and they likely had a choice to bring back both or as was the case the one of their choice, Edelman as WR2 was just never the case, and neither was a significant transition away from a Welker centric offense.
We are all welcome to our opinions and if is this what justifies yours then I stick with my original contention that it was ludicris.
Last edited: