OT: Christmas night game - GB vs Chi

PatsSB42 said:

Rogers at his age and who knows how any more still to come will break every record with the way the game has changed

Click to expand...

Well, it'll be at least the end of next season before he can break TFB's 21 straight.

lmao 5 tds with a whole qtr left!

Rodgers is an idiot who cares too much about his stats. 5 TD's for him, 0 rushing? Especially when you have Ryan Grant and James Starks back there?

How many slants will the bears give them? Also, Rodgers has a shot to break Brady's td record.

WTF is up with the Bears goal line D? 3TD's on the same play!!!

Brady would have had 55ish TDs in 07 if the Pats NEVER ran the ball in the red zone. There is stat padding and there is this.

...and Rogers and the Packers will be awed but we run up the score

look at these haters lol

nabwong said:

How many slants will the bears give them? Also, Rodgers has a shot to break Brady's td record.

Click to expand...

GB has to play DET next week.

lol..I need to learn how to block certain people...So the bears are eliminated officially after tonight?

ctpatsfan77 said:

GB has to play DET next week.

Click to expand...

det just clinched theyre going to rest alot because they dont have a 1st rd bye

I think Det is still playing for seeding...Big difference between 5th and 6th seed.

jcdavey said:

look at these haters lol

Click to expand...

look at these contrarians. I thought Mazz was on vacation..LOL

PatsGirl2011 said:

I think Det is still playing for seeding...Big difference between 5th and 6th seed.

Click to expand...

ok ,wasnt sure if atl could catch em

OK Arod, let's get # 6.

Give up 18 points to a guy who was coaching highschool football and 3rd and 4th string RBs, studs!

Look it. I admit I want our guy to hang on to the record for a while but isn't it obvious that Rogers is trying to score now, not for winning this game anymore, but just for the stats?

PatsSB42 said:

Look it. I admit I want our guy to hang on to the record for a while but isn't it obvious that Rogers is trying to score now, not for winning games anymore, but just for the stats?

Click to expand...

IDk..I get a certain ****iness from the Packers ala Colts 2004..

Chill people. So what if Rodgers is going for stats? It is neither illegal nor morally wrong. Deal with it.

PatsSB42 said:

Look it. I admit I want our guy to hang on to the record for a while but isn't it obvious that Rogers is trying to score now, not for winning this game anymore, but just for the stats?

Click to expand...

I guess that's why they took Rodgers out huh? And Brady and the Pats never do anything like that? Quit grasping for excuses. When you're ahead you want to bury the other team, not give them a chance to get back into it.