Interesting points from Tom Curran

Doggin94it said:

I see the problem - you don't know what you're talking about. You're essentially counting every player who played a down for the patriots as a "contributor".

Click to expand...

First off, I used your idiotic parameters. Secondly, if you had even a modicum of intelligence, you'd know that I did NOT, in fact, count every player who had played a down for the Patriots. But, I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

Doggin94it said:

More, you're treating first round picks and mid-round picks as though they ought to be judged by the same standard. What you got out of Maroney would have been great if he was a fifth round pick; as a first rounder, he was a failure.

Click to expand...

No, I am not treating first round picks and mid round picks as though they ought to be judged by the same standards. That is just you making stuff up because you are now realizing how stupid your claims are.

Doggin94it said:

Lets lay down some ground rules: if you cut them before their rookie deals expired, they aren't successful draft picks. (Tate, Butler, Wilhite). A second TE who was a mediocre blocker and caught 21 balls over 3 seasons isn't a contributor (Thomas). I'm not going to knock late round picks like Lekevin Smith - anything you get out of them is a bonus - but if you consider folks like Wilhite, Maroney, Butler, Andrews, and Tate successful picks, I don't know what else to tell you.

Click to expand...

Ground rules? So, now you are changing what parameters you are using to justify the idiocy you posted originally about your garbage Jets team?? And you think that I should agree to even more idiocy on your part? I don't think so.

Doggin94it said:

Again, if you want to stack that up against the Jets' best picks over the same period, you can go ahead:

Click to expand...

No, I don't want to stack anything against the garbage that the Jets had for picks. Especially when talking to you? Why? Because you've already proven that your bias is so far beyond ridiculous and irrational that there is no point.

BTW, Revis is a douche bag who gets away with more pass interference, illegal contact and holding penalties than Congress bounces checks.. Seriously. You should actually watch a game and see how bad he is in terms of committing penalties that aren't called..

BTW, only a complete idiot would weigh players of different positions against one another. But I am not surprised that you did so.

Dogginit94 said:

That's ridiculous. Simple question - would you trade the 13 "contributors" you're talking about for the Jets' 9 contributors from rounds 1-3 over that period?

Click to expand...

No. it wasn't ridiculous. Sorry that you don't like real facts. But then, you've shown that you'd rather ignore facts than actually deal with reality..

I can see why Hodgey was complaining.