Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
BB just said in his press conference that he has already heard from a couple of teams that have picks in the mid second round that have called about trading up to the Pats #33.
Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
That's nice, I say lets take 2011 off by taking a dive in the 2011 season and we will have great Draft choices in 2012.
Maybe we can trade all of our picks tomorrow into 2012!
Let's see...have we bettered our-self for 2011?....And the answer to that is?..... no. Solder is a year away. He might as well sit on the couch with me and watch the games so he doesn't get hurt.
I can see him trading down to third and forth choices Friday then listening to the media say what a genius he is.
One good Draft in five years qualifies I guess.
Oh well. To be expected.
Does anyone know of a phone company in Foxborough who can disconnect the phones at the Razor Friday so Bill can't trade down anymore?
DW Toys
Walk away from the ledge, DW. LOL. The Pats have plenty of picks to go yet. They will probably end up with around 10 selections plus 2-3 extra picks for 2012 before the dust settles. There are still some solid players that can be taken in round 2.
That's nice, I say lets take 2011 off by taking a dive in the 2011 season and we will have great Draft choices in 2012.
Maybe we can trade all of our picks tomorrow into 2012!
Let's see...have we bettered our-self for 2011?....And the answer to that is?..... no. Solder is a year away. He might as well sit on the couch with me and watch the games so he doesn't get hurt.
I can see him trading down to third and forth choices Friday then listening to the media say what a genius he is.
One good Draft in five years qualifies I guess.
Oh well. To be expected.
Does anyone know of a phone company in Foxborough who can disconnect the phones at the Razor Friday so Bill can't trade down anymore?
DW Toys
hahahahahahaha. im with you...i may not be on the ledge right now, but ive taken the whole bottle of pills, and now im trying to decide if im going to make myself throw up.:deadhorse:
This seems about right. At some point we will likely secure another 2012 pick. This seems a very reasonable possibility. We would still have the same 3 2's and 2 3's tomorrow as we do now.
I also could see someone else wanting to trade up in addition to Seattle. Belichick has a long, long time to listen to offers.
And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.
Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.
And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.
Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.
you had me. im right there with you. but you lost me big time with the last sentence. lets be rational here. but the first paragraph....couldnt have said it better myself.
thats the 33rd pick for a 2nd rounder in 2012. we would be getting a lower 2nd round pick to make up for our lost 33rd. why trade a very high second round pick in 2011 for a second rounder in 2012?? just make the pick at 33 and be done with it.
thats the 33rd pick for a 2nd rounder in 2012. we would be getting a lower 2nd round pick to make up for our lost 33rd. why trade a very high second round pick in 2011 for a second rounder in 2012?? just make the pick at 33 and be done with it.
I think I was unclear. You move down in the second round and Also get an additional 2nd next year. You would still have 3 seconds and 2 thirds left this year and 2 firsts and 2 seconds next year
The Pats are on schedule to end up with 31 picks in the first round one year. The other pick in the draft will be held by the Colts because Polian is difficult to trade with.
And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.
Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.
Absolute nonsence. Rams, would they trade? Carolina after taking Newton... or how about Titans who spent 8th overall today, or Jags who took Gabbert. Teams that have $30m guarenteed in QBs cannot afford two of them.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
