PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Time to Give Chad Jackson Some Slack


Status
Not open for further replies.
As I said two weeks ago: The kid is hurt. End of story.
 
The Chad Jackson obsession from both sides is annoying. Cut him some slack, but at the same time shut up about him until he does anything in the pros.

He's not the second coming of Jerry Rice. He's not a bust. He's a rookie who can't sniff the field due to injuries, immaturity, or whatever.

That said I can't blame anybody who is worrying that he might be a bust. 5 games into his rookie year and the best and most familiar comparison is Bethel. Hopefully by the end of the year this notion seems foolish.
 
TomBrady'sGoat said:
The Chad Jackson obsession from both sides is annoying. Cut him some slack, but at the same time shut up about him until he does anything in the pros.

He's not the second coming of Jerry Rice. He's not a bust. He's a rookie who can't sniff the field due to injuries, immaturity, or whatever.

That said I can't blame anybody who is worrying that he might be a bust. 5 games into his rookie year and the best and most familiar comparison is Bethel. Hopefully by the end of the year this notion seems foolish.

You call for objectivity, but then yourself make the comparison to Bethel.

There's a MUCH better comparison to be made regarding CJ:

CJ = 95% of NFL Rookie WRs. Did Bethel's rookie production fit into that 95%? Sure, but just because they're in the same majority doesn't mean they're heading down the same path.

It is one of the positions that is the slowest to develop in the National Football League. It's been shown time and again that many of todays star recievers came out of the gates slow. Rookies like Moss or Glenn or Boldin are rare. They are not what Jackson should be compared to.

And neither should he be compared to our most recent bust player after one TC, 4 preseason games and 5 weeks in th NFL. He's not Bethel Johnson. He's a rookie. And a Rookie that has had an injury.
 
Brownfan80 said:
It is one of the positions that is the slowest to develop in the National Football League. It's been shown time and again that many of todays star recievers came out of the gates slow. Rookies like Moss or Glenn or Boldin are rare. They are not what Jackson should be compared to.

And neither should he be compared to our most recent bust player after one TC, 4 preseason games and 5 weeks in th NFL. He's not Bethel Johnson. He's a rookie. And a Rookie that has had an injury.

don't forget, an awesome rookie season doesn't always mean better things to come - look at Michael Clayton of the Bucs - rookie year he had over 1000 yards receiving and a bunch of TDs - since then he's done absolutely nothing.
 
I was going to post this yesterday but decided to wait for the next CJ thread instead. It's Felger's take so don't shoot the messenger but take it for what it's worth as an FYI.

Yesterday on Felger's show he talked about him again at length because he actually was allowed (or decided) to talk to the media which is not the norm for rookies at Gillette. From the snipets I heard he's not the most easily understood or articulate of the bunch. They were asking him about his progress with the injury and the playbook and basically what the hangup was.

As Felger deciphered it IHO Chad confirmed problem is two fold (and he says it jives with much of what he had been hearing). The playbook itself was never a problem - he understands the offense in theory just fine. But on the field he cannot yet put that understanding into practice because the game at this level is moving too fast for him. There is no time to think through what he knows, and until he gets past that often common hurdle and the game slows down for him and he is able to react instinctively based on that knowledge he will be noticably limited. That is why they are proceeding slowly with him and giving him just a series of plays to focus on each week per game. Unfortunately with that approach there is no guarantee as the game progresses that his number (plays) will be called.

The other problem Felger believes he is having is rooted in understanding what is expected of you in the NFL when injured. Apparently in college players are not always expected to practice unless they are 100% yet they are generally allowed to play unless just too seriously injured to contribute. This tends to feed a mentality where you don't always push yourself or practice hard but you expect to play come Saturday because of your talent. As we all know it doesn't work that way here given the comparatve complexity of the NFL game, particularly for youngsters. Felger says he has to figure out how to determine when it is really in his or their best interest to back off and when it is time to push through not being ideally 100% - because as Brady and BB will often tell you no NFL player is once we get to week 1.

The elevated focus on detecting and treating injuries at this level may have led him to conclude he was not expected to extend himself until he felt he was 110% ready and he has lost valuable on field time in the system in the interim. Agents too will sometimes feed that belief in the hope that they are protecting their asset from potentially looking bad in what can be a pretty unforgiving league. Better to be unavailable than appear to be performing poorly out of the gate because that next contract always looms for them. He seems to be practicing consistently in the last couple of weeks but he admits he remains behind the curve in adjusting to the speed of the game. And that is simply not going to change until he makes it his focus to get on the field as much as possible. Around here you insure you do that from Monday to Friday. Veterans learn that talent alone won't keep you in the NFL. You have to prove you can reliably get or stay on the field, and they learn to read themselves injury wise and balance the risk/reward of playing through some level of discomfort vs. being labeled not durable.
 
A huge post Mo in terms of quality and common sense.
The kid has been hurt and is struggling with the speed of the game at this level. Its pretty staright forward.
Thank you for cutting through all the crap!
 
I don't believe a word Felger says about Chad Jackson. Felger has a habit of ELABORATING on info he receives from within the Pats' organization. He takes an innocent, casual statement by a player or source and whips it up to fit his agenda. He reveals his casual disregard for the truth in his constant invention of conspiracies, and by explaining away his tolerance and tacit approval of Borges' lies by saying "It's just football! Borges' opinions are entertaining! I love it!" As far as CJ goes, Jackson revealed in the interview yesterday that in college there was MORE pressure to play everyday, and ZERO tolerance for injuries. Jackson never missed a college football game. Yesterday he revealed the Pats WANT him to go slowly, WANT him to get back to 100%, WANT him to tell the trainers if there is ANY problem. In short, I believe Chad is meeting BB's expectations in regard to work habits, intelligence, and toughness. BB has said as much this week, predicting that CJ would be a "good player for the Pats" and repeating the comment for emphasis. The only evidence to the contrary are the babbling conspiratorial rants of Borges' lapdog.
 
Last edited:
MoLewisrocks said:
I was going to post this yesterday but decided to wait for the next CJ thread instead. It's Felger's take so don't shoot the messenger but take it for what it's worth as an FYI.

Yesterday on Felger's show he talked about him again at length because he actually was allowed (or decided) to talk to the media which is not the norm for rookies at Gillette. From the snipets I heard he's not the most easily understood or articulate of the bunch. They were asking him about his progress with the injury and the playbook and basically what the hangup was.

As Felger deciphered it IHO Chad confirmed problem is two fold (and he says it jives with much of what he had been hearing). The playbook itself was never a problem - he understands the offense in theory just fine. But on the field he cannot yet put that understanding into practice because the game at this level is moving too fast for him. There is no time to think through what he knows, and until he gets past that often common hurdle and the game slows down for him and he is able to react instinctively based on that knowledge he will be noticably limited. That is why they are proceeding slowly with him and giving him just a series of plays to focus on each week per game. Unfortunately with that approach there is no guarantee as the game progresses that his number (plays) will be called.

The other problem Felger believes he is having is rooted in understanding what is expected of you in the NFL when injured. Apparently in college players are not always expected to practice unless they are 100% yet they are generally allowed to play unless just too seriously injured to contribute. This tends to feed a mentality where you don't always push yourself or practice hard but you expect to play come Saturday because of your talent. As we all know it doesn't work that way here given the comparatve complexity of the NFL game, particularly for youngsters. Felger says he has to figure out how to determine when it is really in his or their best interest to back off and when it is time to push through not being ideally 100% - because as Brady and BB will often tell you no NFL player is once we get to week 1.

The elevated focus on detecting and treating injuries at this level may have led him to conclude he was not expected to extend himself until he felt he was 110% ready and he has lost valuable on field time in the system in the interim. Agents too will sometimes feed that belief in the hope that they are protecting their asset from potentially looking bad in what can be a pretty unforgiving league. Better to be unavailable than appear to be performing poorly out of the gate because that next contract always looms for them. He seems to be practicing consistently in the last couple of weeks but he admits he remains behind the curve in adjusting to the speed of the game. And that is simply not going to change until he makes it his focus to get on the field as much as possible. Around here you insure you do that from Monday to Friday. Veterans learn that talent alone won't keep you in the NFL. You have to prove you can reliably get or stay on the field, and they learn to read themselves injury wise and balance the risk/reward of playing through some level of discomfort vs. being labeled not durable.
Ahhhh, some additional information. Love it. :cool:

The explanation for the injury issue sounds very plausible. I don't know enough to say more than that about it.

But I think the "speed of the game" explanation that addresses the "not knowing the playbook" issue part makes a whole lot of sense. It would be consistent with something that I recall from Holley's book: that the Pats recognize the difference between being smart (learning the playbook) and being able to think quickly on your feet and under pressure (make the reads on the field). Not to bring up a sore subject, but I think we may have been spoiled by Branch in this regard. He was far more NFL-ready than most for the Pats complex system. Sounds like Jackson is more towards the norm and is making progress, hence the positive words from Belichick. Too early to really tell, of course, and if he doesn't learn his lesson about practicing, it could sink him, but I think I'll look at the glass as half full for now. :D

Thanks for the post, MoLewisRocks. It's really helpful for a non-local like myself to have the good stuff extracted from the local non-print media, to which I have no access.
 
Great info and insight, guys, on the issue of CJ's work ethic, learning the offense and injury. However, if I may, the original topic of the thread was the young man's maturity and character, which was maliciously (and, wrongfully, according to Tomase's reporting of the event) assassinated by the Fred Kirsch Crew.

Honestly, if Kirsch and Company ever read this board, I would appreciate if they were to explain their actions to us regarding this 21 year old rookie and their whispering campaign against him.
 
Brownfan80 said:
You call for objectivity, but then yourself make the comparison to Bethel.

There's a MUCH better comparison to be made regarding CJ:

CJ = 95% of NFL Rookie WRs. Did Bethel's rookie production fit into that 95%? Sure, but just because they're in the same majority doesn't mean they're heading down the same path.

It is one of the positions that is the slowest to develop in the National Football League. It's been shown time and again that many of todays star recievers came out of the gates slow. Rookies like Moss or Glenn or Boldin are rare. They are not what Jackson should be compared to.

And neither should he be compared to our most recent bust player after one TC, 4 preseason games and 5 weeks in th NFL. He's not Bethel Johnson. He's a rookie. And a Rookie that has had an injury.

I didn't make a comparison to Bethel, I said that I understand the comparison. Same position, same team, same round, same inability to get on the field. I see it as being a knee-jerk comparison and don't believe it myself, but I can understand where it's coming from.

I don't understand all the people who have proclaimed him a Deion replacement, a #1 receiver, or have banners in their sigs promoting his greatness. The guy has done nothing in the NFL.

Talent and potential used to excite me more but the Pats have taught me that results matter much more than potential.
 
What does not worry me about Chad Jackson now - his character.

Wasn't that the question earlier in the season. All the shadowy rumors about an incident of immaturity at the charity gala? As far as I can tell from that info Chad Jackson was just trying to get some laughs. And hey he shouldn't quit his dayjob, but that is certainly NOT an incident that rises to the level where I'm going to question his character.

I am worried about his ability to get on the field and catch up with the speed of the game but unlike a Santonio Holmes, I'm not going to be worried about Chad Jackson getting in trouble with the law or being a problem in the locker room.

Whoever wrote up the "character" rumor about Chad Jackson in the first place owes the kid an apology. Journalistic integrity concerning the Pats and their players isn't exactly sterling recently. Particularly "the players hate the coach" story, etc. This is just another example of lame journalism distorting the truth. The media in this town stinks.
 
The fact that BB has actually let Chad Jackson talk to the media when you normally hear next to nothing from rookies has to tell you something. If there was any validity to the CJ rumors, BB would probably not be happy enough with CJ to even give him the chance to defend himself in the media.

My guess is, what has unfolded goes something like this:

Chad Jackson injures his hamstring. Chad Jackson comes back for 3 days and injures his hamstring again. Patriots and CJ decide to come back slow, both physically and in terms of learning the offense. This isn't fast enough for the negative nancies and old farts who for some reason or another just don't like the look of Chad Jackson and assume a lot of things about him without any basis (ie, just look how grossly blown out of proportion the fan's night incident was, is Boston like the town in Footlose or something? guy was just trying to make a joke).

Which leads us to now, when the rumors have continued to grow, again with no basis in reality, and finally, BB and the Pats are letting CJ talk so he can put out a positive message and essentially defend himself from the completely baseless and unwarranted character assault that certain members of the media have launched on him.

At least that's my take on things. I've noticed everytime I weigh in on Chad Jackson, the thread ends. So, this very well could be the last post in this thread again :confused:
 
Last edited:
TomBrady'sGoat said:
I didn't make a comparison to Bethel, I said that I understand the comparison. Same position, same team, same round, same inability to get on the field. I see it as being a knee-jerk comparison and don't believe it myself, but I can understand where it's coming from.

I don't understand all the people who have proclaimed him a Deion replacement, a #1 receiver, or have banners in their sigs promoting his greatness. The guy has done nothing in the NFL.

Talent and potential used to excite me more but the Pats have taught me that results matter much more than potential.

Ah, I've got you now. Well that's why I've got good old Troy Brown and Tom Brady in my sig. :D
 
The problem with the media in this area is that they believe everyone is guilty until proven innocent. They always assume the worst. The similar thing happened when Brady was named by Barry Bond's trainer and people started freaking out in the local media like it was some scandal when it was a complete non-story.

It wouldn't kill them to get their facts and wait and see before dragging someone's name through the mud.
 
You guys should listen to PFW in Progress. Casale address this post at the start of the show and said Thomase wasn't even there when stuff was going on. He asked Casale what happened. He responded directly to here. I have to say, he made a good point. If he made up things that happened there, he would have gotten into trouble because he actually works for the team and Fred Kirsch agreed. If you think about it, he's saying it on Patriots.com and if it was something that wasn't true, wouldn't Belichick or Kraft put a stop to it? I don't know, the way he broke it down on the radio, it doesn't sound like he made anything up. He also said, Thomase only reported one small thing and the joke wasn't what he was referring to in the first place. He also said you could e-mail Thomase and ask him whether or not what he was saying is true. Anyways, you guys should listen.
 
patriotsrule said:
You guys should listen to PFW in Progress. Casale address this post at the start of the show and said Thomase wasn't even there when stuff was going on. He asked Casale what happened. He responded directly to here. I have to say, he made a good point. If he made up things that happened there, he would have gotten into trouble because he actually works for the team and Fred Kirsch agreed. If you think about it, he's saying it on Patriots.com and if it was something that wasn't true, wouldn't Belichick or Kraft put a stop to it? I don't know, the way he broke it down on the radio, it doesn't sound like he made anything up. He also said, Thomase only reported one small thing and the joke wasn't what he was referring to in the first place. He also said you could e-mail Thomase and ask him whether or not what he was saying is true. Anyways, you guys should listen.

Casale has disliked Chad Jackson for some time (edited out harshness against Casale b/c I think patriotsrule is Tom Casale or one of his closest friends, I mean, that post read like an advertisement). The reason why we can't disprove his take on the fan night thing is b/c he won't say what happened! He just keeps being ambigious and foreboding.

Tomase might not have been there, but he probably spoke to someone who was, which frankly makes him a much more reliable source than Casale.

EDIT: Also, do you think BB and Pioli and Kraft go around "putting a stop" to anything that isn't true? You know how much garbage is reported on the Pats on a weekly basis by anyone not named Price or Reiss?? Gimme a break! They'd have to quit their day jobs if they were to "put a stop" to these things. BB's letting Chad Jackson talk is the closest thing to "putting a stop" to media and actively engaging and combatting the media BB is ever going to do.
 
Last edited:
BradyManny2344 said:
The fact that BB has actually let Chad Jackson talk to the media when you normally hear next to nothing from rookies has to tell you something. If there was any validity to the CJ rumors, BB would probably not be happy enough with CJ to even give him the chance to defend himself in the media.

My guess is, what has unfolded goes something like this:

Chad Jackson injures his hamstring. Chad Jackson comes back for 3 days and injures his hamstring again. Patriots and CJ decide to come back slow, both physically and in terms of learning the offense. This isn't fast enough for the negative nancies and old farts who for some reason or another just don't like the look of Chad Jackson and assume a lot of things about him without any basis (ie, just look how grossly blown out of proportion the fan's night incident was, is Boston like the town in Footlose or something? guy was just trying to make a joke).

Which leads us to now, when the rumors have continued to grow, again with no basis in reality, and finally, BB and the Pats are letting CJ talk so he can put out a positive message and essentially defend himself from the completely baseless and unwarranted character assault that certain members of the media have launched on him.

At least that's my take on things. I've noticed everytime I weigh in on Chad Jackson, the thread ends. So, this very well could be the last post in this thread again :confused:

He's a rookie nursing a hammie. End of story.

The rest is ALL media crap. The part about him being immature is total crap, as Shmessy mentions. 100% media fabrication. Felger's take on the situation has an element of truth ( speed of the game to a hamstrung rookie) and then some of the Felger speculation that we all are sick of ( problems with balancing the injury versus being a 'man' about it in practice). Felger thinks everybody with an injury is 'dogging it', that's part of Felger's M.O.

The fact that C.J. is being spoken highly of by BB, and is allowed a little media freedom is a good sign.

He's a few weeks behind, and we are only a few weeks into the year. For comparison's sake, how well does Caldwell seem to know the offense?
 
5 Rings for Brady!! said:
He's a few weeks behind, and we are only a few weeks into the year. For comparison's sake, how well does Caldwell seem to know the offense?

Fair point. I actually like Caldwell and think he'll end up being fine, he just doesn't belong in there every play, but you make a good point. Chad Jackson was an easy media target for the Casales and Felgers of this world, so they went after him. I guess they gotta talk about something, so sometimes they just have to invent stories.
 
BradyManny2344 said:
Casale has disliked Chad Jackson for some time (edited out harshness against Casale b/c I think patriotsrule is Tom Casale or one of his closest friends). The reason why we can't disprove his take on the fan night thing is b/c he won't say what happened! He just keeps being ambigious and foreboding.

Tomase might not have been there, but he probably spoke to someone who was, which frankly makes him a much more reliable source than Casale.

I agree, I don't understand why Casale won't just say what happened. His vagueness causes him to lose a lot of credibility.

I also don't understand why he seems to be the only one who made a big deal of the "incident." There was a lot of media at the event, and I would think that if something happened that was truly noteworthy, the other media sources in attendance would have reported it. It looks as if it really wasn't that big a deal.
 
I'm Ron Borges? said:
Maybe he can't say what happened, did you ever think of that? Those guys aren't Felger who can just say anything. They work for the team and I would imagine have more restrictions on what they can say. My guess is if Thomase saw the same thing as Casale, we would know about it in a second but because he works for the team, he was told to not be specific.

The problem is that it was a NON-STORY from the word go. They are essentially making fun of a kid for being tongue tied in front of a crowd. He was trying to be funny, not immature.

This is a tough pill even by the lowly media standards of N.E.

This story is a non-starter, and should never have been aired.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
Back
Top