efin98
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 5,063
- Reaction score
- 0
There's some truth to that, certainly. But the fact is, we all do reevaluate our initial opinions of decisions. Surely anybody who was around this board on day 1 of the draft remembers reactions like...
"BB you ******* suck as a GM, wholy hell."
"WTG Bill, you have officially lost it.....maybe you need to have a microphone in some other war rooms?"
"epic fail"
"I really don't want to admit this, but I think Belichick has lost his forking marbles!"
"Come on Bill, get your head out of your ***** and stop wasting picks!"
"Please unlock the voting so I can vote FAIL like 1200 times!"
...and then just 24 hours later, the "umm, on second thought, awesome draft!" posts? I have more respect for Curran reevaluating now, rather than watching how all the picks actually turn out before weighing in with a new "opinion."
If I thought it was sincere I'd believe in this...but then again isn't this the same writer who got slammed for claiming Brady's knee operation was botched and stood by it when everyone else proved otherwise?
This to me smells like he is trying to be ahead of the curve on this instead of behind it...using Breer and his eagerness to prove them wrong for not taking Bryant as the driving force.