- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.McGowan was mostly on the bench the last quarter of the season, I'm not sure he's part of the solution. I'm hoping to see a lot more of Chung this year with Sanders and McGowan battling it out for 3rd safety time.
Up in pay could mean retaining the starting position in 2010,I wonder about the status of Sanders and will the team look to trade him..I think he is still a decent Safety although late at times in the tackles department.
If the team drafts a Safety before round 4,someone is going to go.
Why the OP didn't reference the source I have no clue, the way it was posted made it sound made up.
McGowan, Wright receive pay bumps - Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
"Up in pay could mean retaining the starting position", or it could also mean the players' cost is now more than their value and the Pats will be looking to see if suitable replacements can be found... incentive raises are an imperfect way to reward players as there is a limited number of allowable criteria.
Sanders may not be the TE killer that McGowen was, but he is probably our best tackler in the secondary.
McGowan didn't get beat deep for the first half of the season. Then got picked apart for 4 weeks.
Sanders came back and the passing game slowed down for the opposition.
Never said you made it up, but without knowing the source there is no way to assess whether your source made it up. "According to Reiss" would have been sufficient if the actual link was too much.Link or no link..I've been on here for 4 years,I don't make crap up...Just did not get to the link once I posted it.
I'm not your fairy tale fiction poster posting BS non existent stories..get it right
Never said you made it up, but without knowing the source there is no way to assess whether your source made it up. "According to Reiss" would have been sufficient if the actual link was too much.
And you *did* make up the "both today received pay raises" part, because incentive raises most certainly don't happen on April 7. The raises took effect at the start of the league year and were just reported today.
Receiving pay raises today and having them in your pocket is a bit nickpicking eh?
Like your boss saying today I have decided that you deserve a $1 an hour pay raise,does'nt mean hes giving you that right NOW this very moment...c'mon,man
I swear some of you guys are as sensitive as a rash in an armpit
Up in pay could mean retaining the starting position in 2010,I wonder about the status of Sanders and will the team look to trade him..I think he is still a decent Safety although late at times in the tackles department.
If the team drafts a Safety before round 4,someone is going to go.
Where does the "Sanders is a bad tackler" come from? He was laying people out last year. Didn't he throw out like two concussions? I like Sanders, he's not a game changer but he's very useful off the bench when someone is having an awful game or the young guys aren't playing well. Example: the end of last year when the secondary went to sh!t.
Where does the "Sanders is a bad tackler" come from? He was laying people out last year. Didn't he throw out like two concussions? I like Sanders, he's not a game changer but he's very useful off the bench when someone is having an awful game or the young guys aren't playing well. Example: the end of last year when the secondary went to sh!t.
Don't let DW hear you speak so highly of Sanders..
McGowan was mostly on the bench the last quarter of the season, I'm not sure he's part of the solution. I'm hoping to see a lot more of Chung this year with Sanders and McGowan battling it out for 3rd safety time.